Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L01440 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

ANXIETY DISORDER

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (No. 100 of 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 102 of 2014 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L01389) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning anxiety disorder.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that anxiety disorder and death from anxiety disorder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting anxiety disorder or death from anxiety disorder, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning anxiety disorder in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'anxiety disorder' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the factors in Section 9 that must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting anxiety disorder or death from anxiety disorder with the circumstances of a veteran's relevant service. The revision is required to reflect advances in sound medical scientific evidence that have occurred since the repealed Statement of Principles was made;
  • new factor in subsection 9(5) concerning experiencing a potentially morally injurious event, for clinical onset of generalised anxiety disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(35) concerning experiencing a potentially morally injurious event, for clinical worsening of anxiety disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(8) concerning experiencing miscarriage, fetal death in utero or stillbirth as a parent, for clinical onset of generalised anxiety disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(38) concerning experiencing miscarriage, fetal death in utero or stillbirth as a parent, for clinical worsening of anxiety disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(18) concerning inability to undertake physical activity greater than 3 METs, for clinical onset of generalised anxiety disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(48) concerning inability to undertake physical activity greater than 3 METs, for clinical worsening of anxiety disorder;
  • new definitions of 'BMI', 'DSM-5-TR', 'intoxicant dose', 'MET', 'MRCA', 'one pack-year', 'potentially morally injurious event', 'severe and permanent tinnitus', specified list of psychoactive substances' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'category 2 stressor', 'clinically significant disorder of mental health', periodic, heavy alcohol consumption', 'persistent pain' and 'witness' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a medical condition as specified', 'a significant other', 'alcohol', 'an endocrinological disorder as specified'. 'cigarettes per day, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', 'DSM-5', 'intoxication', 'organic solvents', 'specified list of drugs', 'specified list of substances' and 'the medical condition is a direct physiological cause of the anxiety'.

Incorporation

8.             This Instrument incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2022.  A copy of this document is available from the offices of the Repatriation Medical Authority, Level 8, 480 Queen St, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, by contacting the Registrar on telephone (07) 3815 9404.

Consultation

9.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to anxiety disorder in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

10.         On 10 July 2023, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to Category 2 stressor definition revision, deleting: – "being a full-time caregiver to a family member or significant other with a severe physical, mental or developmental disability".  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

11.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

12.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to anxiety disorder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

13.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 100 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Anxiety disorder

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have anxiety disorder;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting anxiety disorder with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 102 of 2014; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning anxiety disorder which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023) was enacted to address gaps in the recognition and understanding of the connection between anxiety disorders and military service. This legislative instrument was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The primary purpose of this legislation is to facilitate the assessment of claims for veterans and Defence Force members suffering from anxiety disorders by establishing factors that must exist to connect such disorders with specific military services. The policy objective is to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and their dependents, including the right to social security, adequate living standards, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. This Statement of Principles replaces the previous Instrument No. 102 of 2014, reflecting advances in medical-scientific evidence.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023) applies to veterans and current or former members of the Defence Force who may be eligible for benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The legislation sets out the specific factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting anxiety disorder or death from anxiety disorder with particular kinds of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The application of the Statement of Principles assists claimants in making claims and the relevant Commissions in assessing eligibility for benefits. It also facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Instrument has a national jurisdictional reach and incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). The Instrument replaces a previous Statement of Principles (No. 102 of 2014) and reflects recent advances in medical-scientific evidence. The Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans and Defence Force members, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning anxiety disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 100 of 2023) is determined under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and applies to claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Statement of Principles outlines the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to particular kinds of service, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting anxiety disorder or death from anxiety disorder with the circumstances of that service. The specified service types include operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service. This Statement of Principles imposes specific obligations on the parties involved in claims related to anxiety disorder. Claimants must provide evidence that the anxiety disorder is connected to their relevant service. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) is responsible for determining whether the evidence provided supports the connection required by the Statement of Principles. Additionally, the Authority must ensure that the factors and definitions outlined in the Statement of Principles are applied correctly when assessing claims. Breaches or non-compliance with the requirements set forth in the Statement of Principles may not result in direct civil or criminal penalties as per the text provided. However, incorrect application of the principles in the assessment of claims could lead to appeals and reviews by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. These bodies have the authority to overturn decisions made by the Authority if they find that the principles were not properly applied. The Statement of Principles incorporates the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) by reference. This incorporation ensures that the clinical criteria for diagnosing anxiety disorders are based on the latest and most reliable medical-scientific evidence. The Authority also consulted with various organisations and individuals before determining the Statement of Principles, although no submissions resulted in changes to the final document. This process helps ensure that the principles reflect the most current understanding of the connection between anxiety disorder and relevant service. The Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any human rights and, in fact, promotes several human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. By facilitating the assessment and determination of claims related to anxiety disorder, the Statement of Principles supports the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Consultation Requirements
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.