Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2021L00014 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 5 OF 2021)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 25 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L00470) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning angle-closure glaucoma.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that angle-closure glaucoma and death from angle-closure glaucoma can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting angle-closure glaucoma or death from angle-closure glaucoma, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019 concerning angle-closure glaucoma in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'angle-closure glaucoma' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'angle-closure glaucoma' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning taking a drug from the specified list of drugs, for clinical onset;
  • new factors in subsections 9(2) and 9(13) concerning taking a drug which causes mydriasis or miosis in the affected eye or an allergic or inflammatory reaction involving structures of the anterior segment of the affected eye;
  • new factors in subsections 9(3) and 9(14) concerning having uveitis, scleritis or episcleritis;
  • new factors in subsections 9(4) and 9(15) concerning having a benign or malignant neoplasm or a non-neoplastic lesion which involves the anterior segment of the affected eye;
  • new factors in subsections 9(5) and 9(16) concerning having a disorder of the lens of the affected eye;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(6) and 9(17) concerning having growth of new blood vessels (neovascularisation) of the iridocorneal angle due to a condition or procedure involving the affected eye from the specified list of conditions or procedures;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(7) and 9(18) concerning having trauma to the affected eye;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(8) and 9(19) concerning having sympathetic ophthalmia, by the inclusion of a note;
  • new factors in subsections 9(9) and 9(20) concerning having surgery to the affected eye, or eyelid of the affected eye;
  • new factors in subsections 9(10) and 9(21) concerning having surgery requiring a general anaesthetic, or surgery in the prone position;
  • new factor in subsection 9(12) concerning taking a drug from the specified list of drugs, for clinical worsening;
  • deleting the factors concerning having occlusion of the iridocorneal angle due to a specified disorder of the affected eye or orbit, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections:
  • 9(3) and 9(14) concerning having uveitis, scleritis or episcleritis;
  • 9(4) and 9(15) concerning having a benign or malignant neoplasm or a non-neoplastic lesion which involves the anterior segment of the affected eye;
  • 9(5) and 9(16) concerning having a disorder of the lens of the affected eye;
  • deleting the factors concerning having intraocular surgery to the affected eye, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(9) and 9(20) concerning having surgery to the affected eye, or eyelid of the affected eye;
  • deleting the factors concerning having non-intraocular surgery to the affected eye or surgery to an eyelid of the affected eye, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(9) and 9(20) concerning having surgery to the affected eye, or eyelid of the affected eye;
  • deleting the factors concerning having received ionising radiation to the affected eye, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(11) and 9(22) concerning undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for cancer, where the affected eye was in the field of radiation;
  • new definitions of 'episcleritis', 'MRCA', 'scleritis', 'specified list of conditions or procedures', 'specified list of drugs', 'trauma', 'uveitis' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'relevant service' and 'sympathetic ophthalmia' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'acute angle-closure glaucoma', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs in the specified list', 'a specified condition or procedure', 'a specified disorder', 'cumulative equivalent dose' and 'trauma as specified'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to angle-closure glaucoma in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to angle-closure glaucoma as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

  Email:    info@rma.gov.au

  Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 5 of 2021

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Angle-closure glaucoma

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have angle-closure glaucoma;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting angle-closure glaucoma with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 25 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning angle-closure glaucoma which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Angle-Closure Glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021), issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to address the medical-scientific evidence linking angle-closure glaucoma and death from angle-closure glaucoma with specific types of military service. This Statement of Principles outlines the necessary factors that must be present and related to particular service circumstances for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting angle-closure glaucoma with the service. The determination was made following an investigation initiated by the Authority and advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 7 May 2019, aiming to update the existing medical-scientific evidence. The primary objective of this Statement of Principles is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation for veterans and Defence Force members who have developed angle-closure glaucoma as a result of their service. This legislative instrument ensures that the conditions for benefit eligibility are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting various human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021) applies to individuals making claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislative instrument sets out the minimum factors that must exist to reasonably connect angle-closure glaucoma or death from angle-closure glaucoma to certain types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service, as well as warlike and non-warlike service. The instrument is determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority and is intended to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, respectively. It also supports the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The instrument applies on a national level across Australia, and while it is primarily focused on veterans and current or former Defence Force members, it also extends to their dependants. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds in the instrument itself, but its application may be subject to the specific provisions of the VEA and MRCA. The instrument may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, but this is not specified in the text.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation focus on the Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021) and its purpose, application, and factors that must exist to connect the condition with service rendered by a person (sections 5, 9, and 10). This Statement of Principles replaces the repealed Instrument No. 25 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L00470). The legislation sets out the factors that must exist as a minimum, and which of those factors must be related to particular kinds of service, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting angle-closure glaucoma or death from angle-closure glaucoma with the circumstances of that service. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act include the determination of the Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence (section 3). The Authority must consider this evidence when determining the Statement of Principles and must ensure that it facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It also outlines the factors that must exist before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting angle-closure glaucoma with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person (section 5). Additionally, the Authority must facilitate the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach are not explicitly stated in the legislation. However, the legislation is compatible with human rights and does not derogate from any human rights, promoting the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and other persons such as their dependents (section 4). The Statement of Principles facilitates the assessment and determination of social security benefits, compensation, and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members, ensuring that these rights are exercised without discrimination of any kind. In conclusion, the Statement of Principles concerning angle-closure glaucoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2021) sets out the factors that must exist to connect the condition with service rendered by a person, replacing the repealed Instrument No. 25 of 2012. The legislation facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA. It also outlines the factors that must exist before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting angle-closure glaucoma with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person. The legislation is compatible with human rights and does not derogate from any human rights, promoting the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and other persons such as their dependents.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.