Statement of Principles concerning analgesic nephropathy No. 29 of 2008

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2008L01116 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 29 of 2008

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 56 of 1994, as amended by Instrument No. 277 of 1995, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning analgesic nephropathy and death from analgesic nephropathy.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that analgesic nephropathy and death from analgesic nephropathy can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 29 of 2008 concerning analgesic nephropathy.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting analgesic nephropathy or death from analgesic nephropathy, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006 concerning analgesic nephropathy in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'analgesic nephropathy' in clause 3;
  • deleting factor concerning 'analgesic abuse';
  • new factors 6(a) & (b) concerning 'phenacetin';
  • new definitions of 'death from analgesic nephropathy', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'relevant service' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • deleting definition of 'ICD code'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to analgesic nephropathy in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             On 10 December 2007, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to analgesic abuse. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to analgesic nephropathy as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 29 of 2008 was enacted to address the issue of analgesic nephropathy and death from analgesic nephropathy, particularly in relation to specific kinds of military service. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, replacing the previous Instrument No. 56 of 1994 and its amendments. The Authority sought to update and clarify the Statement of Principles concerning analgesic nephropathy, taking into account the latest medical-scientific evidence, and ensuring that the instrument adheres to the provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The primary objective of this legislation is to establish a definitive link between analgesic nephropathy, death from analgesic nephropathy, and certain types of military service, thereby facilitating the processing of compensation claims for affected veterans and service personnel.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 29 of 2008, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), establishes a Statement of Principles regarding analgesic nephropathy. This Statement of Principles applies to veterans who have rendered operational, peacekeeping, or hazardous service under the VEA, as well as those who have served in warlike or non-warlike circumstances under the MRCA. The Instrument identifies the minimum factors that must exist to establish a connection between analgesic nephropathy or death from analgesic nephropathy and service circumstances, thereby governing the acceptance of related compensation claims. The Authority's determination, effective as of the date specified in the Instrument, revokes previous Statements of Principles concerning analgesic nephropathy, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence and a revised format aligned with the MRCA's commencement. The Instrument applies nationally, as it pertains to veterans across Australia, and its scope is further defined through the Repatriation Medical Authority, which issues and manages Statements of Principles under the VEA and MRCA.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined a new Statement of Principles (Instrument No. 29 of 2008) under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), replacing the previous Instrument No. 56 of 1994. This new instrument addresses the relationship between analgesic nephropathy and specific types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike services. The new instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist and be connected to these service types to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking analgesic nephropathy or death from analgesic nephropathy with the circumstances of the service. The obligations imposed by this Act require the Authority to review and revise the medical-scientific evidence related to analgesic nephropathy, taking into account the latest available evidence. The Authority is mandated to determine Statements of Principles that accurately reflect the connection between service and the condition, ensuring that these principles are applied consistently to claims under both the VEA and MRCA. Furthermore, the Authority must consult relevant stakeholders, including veterans’ organisations and experts in the field, and provide them with opportunities to submit relevant information or representations before finalizing the instrument. Breaching the requirements outlined in this instrument can lead to significant legal consequences. Under the VEA and MRCA, any person or entity failing to comply with the specified factors and criteria for claims related to analgesic nephropathy may face penalties. These penalties can include the denial of compensation claims, financial penalties, or other civil consequences as determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. In severe cases, wilful misrepresentation or fraud in claims could result in criminal charges, with potential penalties including fines and imprisonment, as outlined in the relevant sections of the VEA and MRCA.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.