Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2019L01089 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

ANAL FISSURE

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 87 OF 2019)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 73 of 2010 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2010L02312) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning anal fissure.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that anal fissure and death from anal fissure can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting anal fissure or death from anal fissure, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 November 2017 concerning anal fissure in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'anal fissure' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'anal fissure' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to ICD-10-AM code in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning trauma to the anal area;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning infection with human immunodeficiency virus;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning straining at stool due to constipation;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being treated with isotretinoin, by removing nicorandil;
  • deleting the factor concerning inflammatory bowel disease;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA', 'trauma to the anal area' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definition of 'trauma to the perianal area'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to anal fissure in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 November 2017, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

9.             On 12 April 2019, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of a factor relating to inflammatory bowel disease.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to anal fissure as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 November 2017.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 87 of 2019

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Anal fissure

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have anal fissure;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting anal fissure with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 73 of 2010; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning anal fissure which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019) is an instrument determined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Statement of Principles was introduced to address the need for a clear and updated set of criteria that links anal fissure to specific types of military service, ensuring that veterans and their dependents can make informed claims for medical treatment and compensation. The Repatriation Medical Authority, which operates under the VEA, determined this Statement of Principles to replace the outdated Instrument No. 73 of 2010. This legislative instrument was developed following an investigation and consultation process aimed at incorporating the latest medical-scientific evidence regarding anal fissure. Its primary policy objective is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by specifying the necessary factors that must be present to establish a connection between anal fissure and military service. The Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must be related to particular kinds of military service to raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting anal fissure with that service. This includes operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence services under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike services under the MRCA. The instrument ensures that claimants and the Repatriation Commission have a clear framework for assessing and processing claims. It also facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The instrument is designed to be compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019) applies to veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents who are seeking medical treatment and compensation for anal fissure under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This instrument outlines the circumstances in which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting anal fissure with the service rendered by a person, which includes operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence services under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike services under the MRCA. The instrument aims to facilitate claimants in making claims and the Repatriation Commission in assessing such claims, as well as the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure, and reflects the latest sound medical-scientific evidence available. It is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from and promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument is applicable nationally, and its application may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concerning anal fissure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 87 of 2019) are sections 2 and 5. Section 2 repeals the previous Instrument No. 73 of 2010 and establishes the new principles concerning anal fissure. Section 5 outlines the factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis that anal fissure is related to particular kinds of service, such as operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service. These sections provide the framework for determining claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) must determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, as required under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA. The Authority must also consult with relevant organisations and individuals during the investigation and determination process. Claimants must provide evidence that meets the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles to support their claims for medical treatment and compensation. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must assess claims based on the principles outlined in the Statement of Principles. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach outlined in the Statement of Principles. However, any breaches of the VEA or MRCA related to the claims process may result in civil or criminal consequences under those Acts. The maximum penalties for offences under the VEA and MRCA can vary depending on the specific offence and jurisdiction. This Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights as it promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Statement of Principles ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination, in accordance with international human rights instruments.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.