Statement of Principles concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency No. 29 of 2015

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2014L01837 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 29 of 2015

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 1 of 2007, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.
  2. The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and death from alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 29 of 2015 concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.
  3. The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.
  4. The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency or death from alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, with the circumstances of that service.

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2012 concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

  • revising the definition of 'alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency' in clause 3;
  • new factor 6(a) concerning 'smoking', for clinical worsening only;
  • new definition of 'pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' in clause 9;
  • revising the definition of 'relevant service' in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2012, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2012.

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 29 of 2015

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 4 of the Explanatory Notes;
  • replaces Instrument No. 1 of 2007; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 29 of 2015 was enacted to address the medical-scientific evidence linking alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency to specific types of service, as required under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 1 of 2007, reflecting new evidence and revisions to the definitions of key terms such as "alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency" and "relevant service." It facilitates claims for compensation and medical treatment by outlining the minimum factors that must exist to establish a connection between the deficiency and service rendered. The Authority conducted an investigation, advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 2 May 2012, and determined that the instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting veterans' and service members' rights to social security, adequate living standards, and health. This legislative instrument enhances the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA by improving the criteria for assessing claims.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 29 of 2015 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 addresses the recognition of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency as a service-related condition. This instrument facilitates claims for medical treatment and compensation by specifying the circumstances under which such benefits can be extended to eligible persons with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. It applies to veterans, service personnel, and their dependants who have contracted this condition as a result of specified types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 1 of 2007 and reflects updated medical-scientific evidence. The Authority determines these Statements of Principles to ensure that claims are assessed and reviewed fairly, promoting human rights such as the right to social security, adequate living standards, and health, as well as the rights of persons with disabilities. The instrument is compatible with human rights and does not derogate from any human rights, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the authority conferred by subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has determined Instrument No. 29 of 2015, replacing the previous Instrument No. 1 of 2007 concerning alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. This new instrument outlines the Statement of Principles that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency with specific types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike or non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Claims for compensation or benefits related to this condition, if the service commenced on or after 1 July 2004, must be assessed in accordance with this Statement of Principles (section 4). The Act imposes several obligations on claimants and the Repatriation Commission. Claimants must provide evidence that links their alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency to their service, meeting the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. The Repatriation Commission, in turn, must assess these claims in accordance with the guidelines established in the instrument. Additionally, the Authority must ensure that the instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms as recognised in international instruments, as evidenced by the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights included in the instrument. Breach of the provisions outlined in the instrument can lead to various consequences. For instance, if a claimant provides false information or evidence, they may face penalties under the VEA or the MRCA, which can include fines or other legal actions. The Repatriation Commission has the authority to reject claims that do not meet the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. Additionally, failure to adhere to the requirements of the instrument may result in the denial of benefits or compensation, impacting the claimant's eligibility for medical treatment and financial support. The exact penalties for such breaches are not specified in the instrument but can include financial penalties, legal action, or other sanctions as determined by the relevant authorities.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.