Statement of Principles concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder No. 7 of 2012

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00014 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 7 of 2012

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 17 of 1999, as amended by Instrument No. 28 of 2002, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and death from adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 7 of 2012 concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder or death from adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 24 June 2009 concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(m) concerning 'an injury';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(n) concerning 'paralysis of the affected shoulder, including cerebrovascular accident with shoulder paralysis';
  • revising factors 6(c) & 6(o) concerning 'diabetes mellitus';
  • new factors 6(d) & 6(p) concerning 'a musculoskeletal disorder';
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(q) concerning 'a malignant neoplasm involving the region of the affected shoulder, including ipsilateral breast cancer and ipsilateral chest wall tumour';
  • new factors 6(f) & 6(r) concerning 'a malignant neoplasm of the lung';
  • new factors 6(g) & 6(s) concerning 'hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism';
  • new factors 6(h) & 6(t) concerning 'Parkinson's disease';
  • new factors 6(i) & 6(u) concerning 'highly active antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency infection';
  • new factors 6(j) & 6(v) concerning 'immobilisation of the affected shoulder';
  • new factors 6(k) & 6(w) concerning 'myocardial infarction';
  • new factors 6(l) & 6(x) concerning 'pulmonary tuberculosis, chronic bronchitis or emphysema';
  • new definitions of 'a musculoskeletal disorder as specified', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'immobilisation of the affected shoulder' and 'injury involving the affected shoulder' in clause 9;
  • revising definition of 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'hemiplegia', 'ICD-9-CM code', 'monoplegia', 'quadriplegia' and 'trauma to the affected shoulder'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder in the Government Notices Gazette of 24 June 2009, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny Act 2011).

 

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 24 June 2009.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 7 of 2012, an instrument under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was enacted to address the issue of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder in Australian veterans and service personnel. This instrument revokes previous regulations concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and establishes a new Statement of Principles that sets out the minimum factors necessary to establish a connection between adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder or death from adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and various kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service. The new instrument clarifies the format and terminology used, incorporates the latest medical-scientific evidence, and is compatible with international human rights standards. The instrument was determined following an investigation initiated by the Authority, with no submissions received during the investigation process.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 7 of 2012, concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, applies to veterans and service personnel who have served in various capacities, including operational, peacekeeping, and hazardous service, as well as British nuclear test defence service. Additionally, it applies to those who have rendered warlike or non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The Instrument serves to replace previous revoked instruments and aims to establish the connection between adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder or death from adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and specific service conditions. It is important to note that the Statement of Principles outlined in this Instrument applies to claims for compensation that commenced on or after 1 July 2004, with the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission determining such claims by reference to the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. The Instrument is applicable across Australia and is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. This Instrument, in its current form, takes into account the commencement of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 and is determined for the purposes of both the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically Instrument No. 7 of 2012, detail the revocation of previous statements of principles concerning adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (section 2) and the establishment of a new Statement of Principles (section 3). This new instrument, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), outlines the specific factors that must exist for a connection to be established between adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and certain kinds of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service (section 4). The new instrument also applies to warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (section 4). The obligations imposed by this legislation require the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to consider sound medical-scientific evidence when determining the connection between adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and military service (section 2). The Authority must ensure that the new Statement of Principles accurately reflects the latest evidence and that it is compatible with human rights standards (section 9). Furthermore, the Authority is mandated to advertise its intention to investigate and to solicit submissions from relevant organisations and individuals (section 8). This process ensures that the determinations are informed by a broad range of expertise and perspectives. Breach of the obligations or non-compliance with the requirements of this Act may lead to various civil and criminal consequences. For instance, failure to provide necessary evidence or submit required information may result in the denial of compensation claims. Additionally, any misleading or false information provided during the investigation or in the determination of the Statement of Principles may be considered an offence. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory notes, breaches of related provisions in the VEA and MRCA can result in penalties including fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in the relevant sections of the VEA and MRCA.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Health Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.