Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2021L00002 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

ACUTE INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 17 OF 2021)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 3 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L00007) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning acute infectious mononucleosis.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that acute infectious mononucleosis and death from acute infectious mononucleosis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting acute infectious mononucleosis or death from acute infectious mononucleosis, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019 concerning acute infectious mononucleosis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'acute infectious mononucleosis' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning being exposed to the Epstein-Barr virus, by the inclusion of a note;
  • deleting the factor concerning being in an immunosuppressed state;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'being exposed to the Epstein-Barr virus' and 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definition of 'being in an immunosuppressed state'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to acute infectious mononucleosis in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 25 August 2020, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to being in an immunosuppressed state at the time of the clinical onset of acute infectious mononucleosis.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to acute infectious mononucleosis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

  Email:    info@rma.gov.au

  Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 17 of 2021

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Acute infectious mononucleosis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have acute infectious mononucleosis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting acute infectious mononucleosis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 3 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning acute infectious mononucleosis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021) was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument aims to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims related to acute infectious mononucleosis, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. The instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect acute infectious mononucleosis with service, as determined by the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. It replaces the previous Statement of Principles from 2012 and incorporates updates to the instrument format and definitions. The Authority consulted with relevant organisations and stakeholders but did not receive any submissions for consideration. The Statement of Principles supports the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents by facilitating access to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. It ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination, in accordance with international human rights instruments. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it neither derogates from any rights nor compromises the principles of accessibility, proportionality, and transparency in the provision of benefits and compensation.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021) applies to claims made under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) by veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents who have been diagnosed with acute infectious mononucleosis and seek to connect their condition to their service. This Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised linking the condition to service rendered, such as operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, or non-warlike service. The Instrument is determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the VEA and applies on a national level in Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions to the application of this Statement of Principles, though it may be subject to further refinement or amendment through subordinate instruments in light of evolving medical-scientific evidence. The Statement of Principles replaces a previously repealed Instrument (No. 3 of 2012) and reflects the latest sound medical-scientific evidence concerning the link between acute infectious mononucleosis and military service. The Repatriation Medical Authority undertook consultation with relevant organisations and stakeholders during the determination of this Instrument, though no submissions were received. The Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes the rights of veterans, Defence Force members, and their dependents, including their right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority ensures that the rights will be exercised without discrimination.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning acute infectious mononucleosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 17 of 2021) is an instrument determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) (section 2). This instrument, which is also applicable under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis that acute infectious mononucleosis or death from acute infectious mononucleosis is connected to particular kinds of service rendered by a person (section 5). The kinds of service include operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike or non-warlike service under the MRCA (section 5). The obligations imposed by the Act include the requirement for the Repatriation Medical Authority to determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, and for the Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to assess claims in accordance with these Statements of Principles (section 2). The instrument aims to facilitate both the making of claims and the assessment of those claims by specifying the circumstances under which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons (section 2). There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in this instrument itself. However, any breaches of the obligations or requirements under the VEA or MRCA, which this instrument is designed to support, could lead to various civil or criminal consequences as per the respective provisions of these Acts. For example, knowingly making a false statement or representation in a claim under the VEA could result in a civil penalty (section 109 of the VEA). Similarly, any fraud or deceit in connection with a claim under the MRCA could result in criminal penalties (section 211 of the MRCA). The maximum penalties for these offences could vary based on the specific circumstances and the provisions of the VEA and MRCA.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Health Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.