Statement of Principles concerning Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis No. 37 of 2007

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2007L01162 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 37 of 2007

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority ('the Authority'), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 ('the VEA') revokes Instrument No. 53 of 1996, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning Achilles tendonitis or bursitis and death from Achilles tendonitis or bursitis.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis and death from Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 37 of 2007 concerning Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 ('the MRCA') relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis or death from Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 November 2003 concerning Achilles tendonitis or bursitis in accordance with section 196G of the Act.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • new definition of 'Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis' in clause 3;
  • rewording factors 6(a) & 6(f) concerning 'weight bearing exercise';
  • new factors 6(c) & 6(h) concerning 'biomechanical abnormality';
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(j) concerning 'fluoroquinolone antibiotics';
  • revising the definitions of 'a systemic arthritic disease' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • new definitions of 'a specified biomechanical abnormality'; 'crystal-induced arthropathy'; 'death from Achilles tendinopathy or bursitis'; 'ICD-10-AM code'; 'MET'; 'reactive arthropathy' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • deleting the definitions of 'ICD code' and 'vigorous physical activity' in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to Achilles tendonitis or bursitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 November 2003, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

9.             Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field. One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the course of the investigation process.

 

10.         On 20 December 2006, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to renal transplan from the 'Balance of Probability' Statement of Principles only. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

11.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to Achilles tendonitis or bursitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 November 2003.

 

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 37 of 2007, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was enacted to address the medical-scientific evidence linking Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis to certain types of service. This legislative instrument revokes an earlier statement of principles concerning Achilles tendonitis or bursitis, replacing it with updated evidence that better identifies the connection between these conditions and service. The Authority, which has the power to determine such statements, conducted an investigation and solicited submissions from relevant stakeholders before finalising the instrument. The policy objective is to ensure that veterans who develop Achilles tendinopathy or bursitis, or who die from these conditions, can make informed compensation claims by clearly establishing the relationship between these medical conditions and their service.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 37 of 2007, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, pertains to claims concerning Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis. This Instrument replaces the previous Instrument No. 53 of 1996, which dealt with similar conditions but was revoked due to new medical-scientific evidence indicating a relationship between Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis and specific types of service. The new Instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist and be connected to operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, or non-warlike service before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised linking these conditions to the service rendered. The application of this Instrument is governed by the determinations of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission for claims filed on or after 1 July 2004. The Instrument applies to veterans and service personnel who have served in the specified categories of service and who may be claiming compensation for Achilles tendinopathy or bursitis related to their service. The scope of this legislation is national, as it pertains to veterans and service personnel across Australia. The Instrument does not include specific exclusions but focuses on establishing criteria for claims related to the specified conditions. Any further clarification or extension of the application of this Instrument may be provided through subordinate instruments or guidelines issued by the Repatriation Medical Authority.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) has revoked Instrument No. 53 of 1996, which pertained to Achilles tendonitis or bursitis and death from Achilles tendonitis or bursitis. In its place, the Authority has determined a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 37 of 2007, concerning Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis. This new instrument effectively replaces the revoked one and is based on sound medical-scientific evidence linking Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis and death from Achilles tendinopathy to specific kinds of service, as detailed in subsection 196B(2) of the VEA. The Statement of Principles sets out the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the service rendered by a person, which include operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting Achilles tendinopathy and bursitis or death from Achilles tendinopathy with the circumstances of the service. These factors are outlined in detail to assist claimants and the Authority in determining eligibility for compensation. The Authority has adopted the latest revised Instrument format, which includes new definitions and reworded factors to reflect current medical understanding and terminology. The obligations imposed on parties by the Act include the requirement for claimants to provide sufficient evidence linking their condition to their service, and for the Authority to review and determine claims in accordance with the Statement of Principles. The Authority must also ensure that the investigation process is transparent and that stakeholders, including veterans, service personnel, and relevant organisations, are informed and have the opportunity to submit relevant information. Any breach of the provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, such as making false claims or providing false evidence, may result in civil or criminal penalties. The maximum penalties for such offences can include fines and imprisonment, as stipulated in the respective Acts. The Authority is also responsible for ensuring compliance with the legislative requirements and may take appropriate action against any party found to be in breach of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.