Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

Administered by Department of Social Services

Legislation au F2006L00350 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

as amended

made under subsections 740(2A), 742(2A) and 745(1A) of the

Social Security Act 1991

This compilation was prepared on 25 August 2006
taking into account amendments up to Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Amendment Determination 2006 (No. 1)

Prepared by the Legal Services Branch,
Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Canberra

 

Contents

Page

1 Name of Determination

2 Commencement

3 Definitions

4 Matters to be taken into account in determining if a person had a reasonable excuse

Notes to the Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

 

 

1 Name of Determination

This Determination is the Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Amendment Determination 2006 (No. 1)2006.

2 Commencement

This Determination commences on 1 July 2006.

3 Definitions

In this Determination:

Act means the Social Security Act 1991.

Note   Other words and phrases used in this Determination that are defined in the Act have the meaning given by the Act.

 

4 Matters to be taken into account in determining if a person had a reasonable excuse

(1) If the Secretary has reason to believe that one or more of the matters set out in subsection (2) is relevant to the question of whether:

(a) for subsection 740 (2) of the Act, a person had a reasonable excuse for committing a special benefit participation failure; or

(b) for paragraph 742 (2) (a) of the Act, a person had a reasonable excuse for a failure of a kind referred to in paragraph 742 (1) (c) of the Act; or

(c) for paragraph 745 (1) (d) of the Act, a person had a reasonable excuse for refusing or failing to accept a suitable offer of employment;

  the Secretary must take the matter into account.

(2) The matters are:

(a) the fact that the person is living in a non-permanent location on the streets or is using emergency accommodation or refuge at the time that the failure or refusal occurred; and

(b) the literacy and language skills of the person, if the person’s lack of such skills is significant; and

Example for paragraph (b)

If the person is unable to comprehend a requirement or an instruction, despite the requirement or instruction being delivered in a form that the person is most likely to comprehend.

 

(c) any illness, impairment or condition of the person that requires frequent treatment, including any illness that is episodic or unpredictable in nature; and

(d) any cognitive or neurological impairment of the person; and

(e) any psychiatric or psychological impairment or mental illness of the person; and

(f) any drug or alcohol dependency of the person; and

(g) any unforeseen family or caring responsibilities of the person; and

(h) the death of an immediate family member; and

(i)  if:

(i) the person has been in gaol; and

(ii) the period that the person spent in gaol exceeded 14 days; and

(iii) the person has been released; and

(iv) the person was released not more than 28 days before the person’s failure to comply with the Act;

the person’s release from gaol.

(3) For subsections (1) and (2), the Secretary must be satisfied that the matter had a significant effect on the person’s capacity to comply with the requirement or the provision of the Act to which the failure or refusal relates.

 

Notes to the Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

Note 1

The Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006 (in force under subsections 740(2A), 742(2A) and 745(1A) of the Social Security Act 1991) as shown in this compilation is amended as indicated in the Tables below.

Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which came into force on 1 January 2005, it is a requirement for all non-exempt legislative instruments to be registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Table of Instruments

Title

Date of
FRLI registration

Date of
commencement

Application, saving or
transitional provisions

Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

8 February 2006 (see F2006L00350)

1 July 2006

 

Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Amendment Determination 2006 (No. 1)

27 June 2006 (see F2006L01986)

1 July 2006 immediately after the commencement of the Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006

 

Table of Amendments

ad. = added or inserted      am. = amended      rep. = repealed      rs. = repealed and substituted

Provision affected

How affected

S. 4(2)...............

am. 2006 F2006L01986

 

Overview

The Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006, enacted under the Social Security Act 1991, was introduced to address the need for a structured approach to evaluating the circumstances under which an individual might have a justifiable reason for not complying with social security obligations. This Determination, which was prepared by the Legal Services Branch of the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, was made to assist in determining whether an individual had a reasonable excuse for failing to meet certain social security requirements. The policy objective is to ensure fairness in the application of social security laws by considering the individual's circumstances that may have impeded their compliance. This Determination came into effect on 1 July 2006, and has been subsequently amended to refine its application and effectiveness.

Scope and Application

The Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006 applies to individuals who are subject to the Social Security Act 1991, specifically in circumstances where they may have a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with certain requirements or provisions of the Act. This includes situations where an individual has a special benefit participation failure, a failure related to a service provider, or a refusal or failure to accept a suitable offer of employment. The determination is made by the Secretary under subsections 740(2A), 742(2A), and 745(1A) of the Act. The Determination identifies various factors that must be taken into account, such as living conditions, literacy and language skills, health conditions, and family responsibilities, to determine whether a reasonable excuse exists. The Determination commenced on 1 July 2006, and it is applicable nationally as it is made under the Commonwealth's Social Security Act 1991. The application of this Determination can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, but no such amendments are currently in effect.

Key Provisions

The Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (FaCSIA) Determination 2006 as amended, under subsections 740(2A), 742(2A) and 745(1A) of the Social Security Act 1991, sets out the factors the Secretary must consider when determining whether a person has a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with certain social security requirements. According to section 4, if the Secretary has reason to believe that any of the specified matters are relevant to whether a person had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the Act, the Secretary must take those matters into account. These matters include the person's living situation, literacy and language skills, health conditions, family responsibilities, and recent release from prison. The Secretary must be satisfied that these matters had a significant effect on the person's capacity to comply with the relevant requirement. The determination imposes obligations on the Secretary to carefully consider these specified factors when assessing a person's compliance with social security obligations. The Secretary must ensure that all relevant circumstances are taken into account to determine whether the person had a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply. This includes evaluating the impact of factors such as homelessness, lack of literacy, health issues, or recent release from prison on the person's ability to meet their social security obligations. Breaching the provisions of this determination can lead to civil and criminal consequences. While the determination itself does not explicitly state penalties, the underlying Social Security Act 1991 provides for penalties for non-compliance. For instance, subsection 740(1) of the Act outlines penalties for special benefit participation failures, which could include fines or imprisonment. The penalties for non-compliance can be severe, with maximum fines and imprisonment terms depending on the nature and severity of the offence. The Act also allows for the recovery of any benefits paid in error, and failure to repay can result in further penalties or legal action.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Social Security Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.