STATUTORY RULES.
1923. No. 140.
REGULATION UNDER THE SHALE OIL BOUNTY ACT 1917‑1923.
I, THE DEPUTY OF THE GOVERNOR‑GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, do hereby make the following Regulation under the Shale Oil Bounty Act 1917‑1923 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty‑eighth day of September, 1923.
W. H. IRVINE,
Deputy of the Governor‑General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
AUSTIN CHAPMAN,
Minister of State for Trade and Customs.
Amendment of Shale Oil Bounty Regulations 1917.
(Statutory Rules 1917, No. 277.)
Regulation 7 of the Shale Oil Bounty Regulations 1917 is repealed, and the following Regulation inserted in its stead:—
“Minimum Quantity.
7. The minimum quantity of oil in respect of which any claim for bounty may be made or recognised shall be 40,000 gallons.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.14423.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Shale Oil Bounty Act 1917-1923 was enacted to address the issue of incentivising the production and refinement of shale oil in Australia, aiming to promote domestic production and reduce reliance on imported oil. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to support the fledgling industry by providing financial incentives, known as bounties, for those engaged in the extraction and refinement of shale oil. The accompanying regulation, Statutory Rules 1923 No. 140, further defined the terms and conditions of these bounties, including adjustments to the minimum quantity of oil eligible for bounty claims. The policy objective of the Act, as stated in the regulation, is to encourage and sustain the shale oil industry through fiscal support, thereby fostering self-sufficiency and economic growth within the sector.
Scope and Application
The Shale Oil Bounty Regulations 1923, made under the authority of the Shale Oil Bounty Act 1917-1923, pertain to entities involved in the production and processing of shale oil within the Commonwealth of Australia. These regulations specifically address the minimum quantity of shale oil required for a claim to be recognised for a bounty. Any entity or individual claiming a bounty must have produced and processed a minimum of 40,000 gallons of shale oil to be eligible. The regulations apply nationally across Australia, affecting industries engaged in shale oil extraction and processing. This legislative instrument amends the previous regulation, increasing the threshold for bounty claims from a lower quantity to 40,000 gallons, thereby impacting the eligibility criteria for such claims. No exclusions or exemptions are specified within the text, and the scope of the regulation is limited to the specified bounty claim threshold.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the regulation revolve around the amendment of the Shale Oil Bounty Regulations 1917. Specifically, Regulation 7 has been repealed and replaced with a new stipulation (Regulation 7). According to this regulation, the minimum quantity of oil required for any claim for bounty to be made or recognised is now set at 40,000 gallons (Reg. 7). This means that any claim for a bounty must be based on oil quantities of at least this amount, which is a significant increase from the previous threshold.
The obligations imposed by this regulation are straightforward but crucial for entities or individuals making claims under the Shale Oil Bounty Act 1917-1923. They must now ensure that their oil quantities meet or exceed the new minimum requirement of 40,000 gallons before submitting any claims for bounty. This change ensures that only significant oil production is eligible for the bounty, potentially impacting how claims are prepared and submitted.
There are no explicit offences or penalties mentioned within the regulation itself. However, the implications of not meeting the minimum oil quantity requirement could result in a claim being ineligible or rejected. Although not detailed in this particular regulation, it is reasonable to infer that repeated or intentional non-compliance with the requirements of the Shale Oil Bounty Act 1917-1923 could lead to more severe penalties as outlined in the main Act or other related legislation. These could include fines, legal action, or other administrative consequences depending on the severity and intent of the breach.