AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SUPREME COURT ACT—
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SUPREME COURT ACT
————
RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
————
Statutory Rules 1967, No. 68(a)
The Rules of this Court be amended in the manner hereinafter appearing, that is to say Rule 8 of Order 26 is amended by inserting a new sub-rule to stand as sub-rule (3.) as follows:—
“(3.) Where any order for payment into Court under this rule is or has been made without any direction as to investment, the money paid into Court shall, subject to any orders which may be made for payment of the same or any part thereof out of Court, be invested in Commonwealth government bonds.”.
—————
E. A. DUNPHY
Judge
(a) Made under the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933-1966 on 12 December 1966; notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 1 June 1967.
———————
Overview
The Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act, enacted in 1933 and amended in 1966, addresses the need for efficient financial management of funds held by the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory. This legislative instrument, Statutory Rules 1967, No. 68, was introduced to ensure that any money paid into the Court without specific investment directions is prudently managed. This was achieved by amending Rule 8 of Order 26 to mandate the investment of such funds in Commonwealth government bonds, providing a stable and secure investment environment. The amendment was made under the authority of the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act and was notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 1 June 1967, reflecting a policy objective to safeguard and effectively utilise the Court's financial resources.
Scope and Application
The Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act applies to the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, regulating its operations, procedures, and the administration of justice within the territory. This legislation encompasses the conduct and transactions that are overseen by the Supreme Court, ensuring that judicial processes are carried out in accordance with established rules and guidelines. The Act applies to persons and entities involved in legal proceedings within the jurisdiction of the Australian Capital Territory, including defendants, plaintiffs, and other parties to legal disputes, as well as legal practitioners and the court itself. The territorial jurisdiction of the Act is limited to the Australian Capital Territory, which means its provisions and the amendments set out in the Statutory Rules apply exclusively within this region. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions mentioned in the provided excerpt, although the application of the Act is subject to the specific rules and regulations outlined in the legislation and any subsequent amendments. The Act’s application may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can introduce further detailed procedural requirements or adjustments to the rules governing the court’s operations.
Key Provisions
The Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act, as amended by Statutory Rules 1967, No. 68, introduces specific provisions regarding the management of funds paid into the court. According to Rule 8 of Order 26, if an order is made for payment into the Court without any direction for investment, the money must be invested in Commonwealth government bonds, subject to any subsequent orders for payment out of Court (sub-rule (3)). This amendment ensures that funds held by the Court are managed in a secure and prudent manner.
Under the amended Rules of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, there are specific obligations placed on the Court to ensure that any money paid into the Court, when no investment direction has been given, is invested in Commonwealth government bonds. This is designed to safeguard the interests of the parties involved by ensuring the funds are placed in a low-risk investment, thereby protecting the value of the money held in Court (Rule 8 of Order 26, sub-rule (3)).
Failure to adhere to the provisions of the amended Rule could potentially lead to administrative or financial mismanagement, although the specific Act does not outline explicit offences, penalties, or consequences for breach. However, the overarching legal framework governing the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court would apply, which may include potential judicial review or other remedies for non-compliance with court-ordered procedures. The emphasis remains on the prudent and lawful handling of funds, reflecting the Court's duty to act in the best interests of justice and the parties involved.