STATUTORY RULES.
1923. No. 172.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this fourteenth day of November, 1923.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. K. BOWDEN,
Minister of State for Defence.
Regulations for the Royal Military College of Australia 1921.
Amendments.
A. Regulation 68 is amended by inserting after the words “The Entrance Examinations” the following words “for candidates under 19 years of age”.
B. Appendix V paragraph 4 is amended by inserting the following sentence “Questions will be set and answers marked by the Board of Studies.” after the sentence which reads —“Arrangements will be made by the Commandant of the Royal Military College for setting questions and marking answers.”
C. Regulation 8 sub-paragraph (iii) is amended by inserting after the word “persons” in line 4 the words “who served in the South African War 1899-1902 in an Australian Force or”.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of AUSTRALIA by Albert J. mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.17560.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1923 No. 172, enacted by the Governor-General in accordance with the Defence Act 1903-1918, introduces specific regulations concerning the Royal Military College of Australia. These regulations aim to update and refine the operational guidelines of the college, addressing particular administrative and educational requirements. The enacting body for these regulations is the Federal Executive Council, with the Minister of State for Defence overseeing the implementation of these changes. The underlying policy objective is to ensure that the Royal Military College adheres to the highest standards of military education and training, thereby enhancing the preparedness and capability of future military leaders.
These amendments seek to clarify the entrance examination process for younger candidates, ensure the Board of Studies is responsible for setting and marking examination questions, and extend eligibility criteria to include individuals who served in the South African War of 1899-1902. By implementing these changes, the regulations aim to maintain and improve the quality of education and leadership development within the institution, aligning it with the evolving needs of the Defence Force.
Scope and Application
The Regulations for the Royal Military College of Australia 1921, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, apply specifically to the governance and administration of the Royal Military College, including its entrance examinations, the marking of examination answers, and the eligibility criteria for candidates. These regulations pertain to individuals under the age of 19 who are applying for entrance into the college, as well as to those who have served in the South African War of 1899-1902 in an Australian Force. The jurisdictional reach of these regulations is limited to the Commonwealth of Australia, indicating their applicability across federal lines within the nation. The amendments introduced by these statutory rules focus on procedural changes, including the involvement of the Board of Studies in setting and marking examination questions and altering the eligibility conditions for entrance examinations. There are no exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds specified within the text of these regulations, and their application is not extended or restricted through subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Regulations for the Royal Military College of Australia 1921, as amended, introduce specific changes to the existing rules governing the college. Firstly, Regulation 68 is amended to include a condition that the entrance examinations apply to candidates under 19 years of age (Reg. 68). This ensures that only candidates meeting the age requirement can participate in the entrance examinations. Secondly, Appendix V paragraph 4 is revised to clarify that questions for the entrance examinations will be set and answers marked by the Board of Studies, rather than by the Commandant of the Royal Military College (Appendix V, para. 4). This change in responsibility ensures a more structured and potentially impartial approach to the examination process. Thirdly, Regulation 8 sub-paragraph (iii) is amended to extend the eligibility criteria for certain positions by including individuals who served in the South African War 1899-1902 in an Australian Force (Reg. 8(iii)). This amendment broadens the pool of potential candidates for specific roles within the college.
The Regulations impose several obligations on the parties involved. For instance, the Board of Studies is now responsible for setting and marking the entrance examination questions (Appendix V, para. 4), requiring them to adhere to established standards and procedures. The Commandant, on the other hand, must ensure that the amended eligibility criteria for positions are properly communicated and implemented (Reg. 8(iii)). Additionally, candidates under 19 years of age must meet the new entrance examination requirements (Reg. 68), which could involve additional preparation or support to meet the college's standards. These obligations ensure that the changes are smoothly integrated into the college's operations.
The Regulations do not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches. However, failure to comply with the amended provisions could potentially lead to administrative consequences, such as disqualification from the entrance examinations or ineligibility for certain positions. While the exact penalties are not detailed in the text, breaches of similar regulations in educational institutions often result in the affected parties being barred from participating in the examination or being removed from the candidate list for positions. The precise consequences would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and the discretion of the college authorities.