STATUTORY RULES.
1926. No. 121.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1918.
I, THE DEPUTY OF THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations, under the Defence Act 1903-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this ninth day of September, 1926.
W. H. IRVINE,
Deputy of the Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
NEVILLE HOWSE.
Minister of State for Defence.
Regulations for the Royal Military College of Australia, 1921.
(Statutory Rules 1921, No. 129, as amended to this date.)
Amendment.
Regulation 44 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following sentence:—
“A cadet should not be expelled, removed or rusticated under this regulation except with the approval of the Military Board.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia
by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.10013.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1926, No. 121, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, introduce amendments to the existing regulations concerning the Royal Military College of Australia, specifically targeting the disciplinary measures for cadets. Enacted by the Deputy of the Governor-General, with advice from the Federal Executive Council, these regulations were intended to address procedural concerns regarding the expulsion, removal, or rustication of cadets. The policy objective underpinning these amendments is to ensure that disciplinary actions against cadets are subject to higher-level oversight, requiring the approval of the Military Board before any such severe measures are implemented. This legislative instrument underscores a commitment to maintaining a structured and accountable approach to cadet discipline within the military college framework.
Scope and Application
The Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918 pertain specifically to the governance and disciplinary measures at the Royal Military College of Australia, with the primary amendment concerning Regulation 44. This regulation, as amended, stipulates that any expulsion, removal, or rustication of a cadet must now require the approval of the Military Board. This ensures a higher level of oversight and formal accountability in disciplinary actions taken against cadets. The Regulations apply to all cadets enrolled at the Royal Military College of Australia and are enforced within the Commonwealth jurisdiction. The Regulations are comprehensive in their application, covering the conduct and management of cadets in the military college setting, thereby affecting the operations and administration of the institution. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within these Regulations, and they extend the disciplinary procedures to include a mandatory review by the Military Board for certain actions. The scope of these Regulations is limited to the internal affairs of the Royal Military College of Australia and does not extend to other military or civilian institutions outside the college.
Key Provisions
The Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918, particularly as amended in Statutory Rules 1926, No. 121, introduce specific provisions concerning the governance and discipline within the Royal Military College of Australia. A notable amendment to Regulation 44 states that a cadet should not be expelled, removed, or rusticated except with the approval of the Military Board (Reg. 44, as amended). This requirement introduces a layer of oversight to ensure that disciplinary actions are not taken lightly and are subject to review by a higher authority.
The obligations imposed by these regulations on the parties involved, particularly the Military Board and the College administration, include a duty to follow due process when considering disciplinary actions against cadets. This entails ensuring that any decision to expel, remove, or rusticate a cadet is made in accordance with established procedures and is subject to the approval of the Military Board. Such oversight is intended to maintain fairness and accountability within the disciplinary process.
Breach of these regulations, particularly if disciplinary actions are taken without the requisite approval of the Military Board, can result in serious consequences. Although the specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in the text, the regulations imply that non-compliance with the stipulated processes could lead to civil or administrative penalties. These may include the requirement to reinstate a cadet who has been improperly expelled, removed, or rusticated, as well as potential disciplinary action against the responsible officials.
The maximum penalties for breaches of these regulations are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, given the context and the importance of the Military Board's oversight, it can be inferred that severe breaches might result in significant consequences for those found to have acted outside the prescribed legal framework. The overarching aim is to ensure that disciplinary measures are applied fairly and with the necessary checks and balances to protect the rights of cadets and uphold the standards of the Royal Military College of Australia.