Royal Military College of Australia Regulations 1916 (Amendment)

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1920 No. 250, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, were introduced to address specific administrative and financial adjustments related to the Royal Military College of Australia for the financial year 1920-21. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, the regulations aim to enhance the operational efficiency and financial management of the college, ensuring that cadet transportation costs are appropriately allocated and that the college’s financial commitments are met. The policy objective is to provide the necessary provisions for the smooth running of the college while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules of 1920, No. 250, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, pertain specifically to the operations and financial arrangements of the Royal Military College in Australia. These regulations apply directly to the institution and its cadets, governing matters such as the maintenance allowance for cadets and the issuance of travel warrants for cadets on duty or on leave. The financial adjustments, such as the increase in the maintenance allowance for the financial year 1920-21, are intended to address the operational costs associated with running the college. Furthermore, these regulations detail the circumstances under which travel warrants can be issued and charged to the public, highlighting the distinction in treatment for cadets who are dismissed or expelled. These provisions are applicable within the Commonwealth of Australia, reflecting the federal oversight and jurisdiction over military institutions as stipulated by the Defence Act. The regulations also include specific exemptions, such as the waiver of public charges for warrants issued to cadets who have been expelled or dismissed.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of this regulation pertain to the Royal Military College of Australia and include amendments to financial provisions and travel arrangements for cadets. Regulation 35(c) specifies an increase in the maintenance allowance for cadets, raising it from five shillings and sixpence (5s. 6d.) to seven shillings and sixpence (7s. 6d.) per diem for the financial year 1920-21. Additionally, Regulation 74 replaces the previous regulation concerning travel warrants for cadets, allowing them to receive first class coastal steamer fares and second class railway fares when travelling on duty or on leave between terms. The Commandant has the authority to issue warrants for sleeping berths and first class rail fares at night when necessary. Importantly, warrants issued to cadets who are expelled, dismissed, removed, or rusticated will not be charged to the public but may be charged against their accounts. The obligations imposed by these regulations primarily focus on the financial management and logistical support for cadets at the Royal Military College. The increased maintenance allowance detailed in Regulation 35(c) ensures that cadets receive adequate financial support for their daily needs during the specified financial year. Regulation 74 requires the Commandant to manage and authorise travel warrants, ensuring that cadets have appropriate travel arrangements while on duty or leave. Furthermore, it mandates that warrants for cadets who are expelled, dismissed, removed, or rusticated should not be charged to the public, although they may be charged against the cadets’ accounts. In terms of consequences for non-compliance with these regulations, the document does not explicitly detail offences, penalties, or specific consequences for breaches. However, given the regulatory nature of the document and the context of its application, any failure to adhere to the stipulated allowances or travel warrant procedures could potentially lead to financial discrepancies or logistical issues for the cadets. The regulations are likely to be enforced within the administrative framework of the Royal Military College, with any breaches addressed through internal disciplinary measures or financial audits. While the document does not provide maximum penalties, breaches could result in administrative or financial repercussions for the involved parties.