AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA AUTHORITY
Telecommunications Act 1997
Paragraph 83(2)(b)
REVOCATION OF NOMINATED CARRIER DECLARATION – Opticomm Pty Ltd
I, Dominic Byrne, delegate of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (‘the ACMA’), acting under paragraph 83(2)(b) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 and being satisfied that:
(a) Opticomm Pty Ltd (ACN 117 414 776) was granted a nominated carrier declaration under subsection 81(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 on 2 May 2019 in relation to network units owned by Sanctuary Cove Communication Services Unit Trust (the ‘Nominated Carrier Declaration’); and
(b) Opticomm Pty Ltd has provided the ACMA with a written notice stating that it does not accept responsibility for the network units for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997;
hereby revoke the Nominated Carrier Declaration under paragraph 83(2)(b) of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
Dated 26 October 2022
Dominic Byrne
Delegate of the Australian Communications and Media Authority
Overview
The Telecommunications Act 1997 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for telecommunications in Australia, addressing the need for a coordinated and efficient system that could keep pace with technological advancements and meet consumer demands. This legislation was introduced to fill a significant gap in the regulation of telecommunications services, ensuring that the industry could operate in a manner that was both competitive and responsive to the needs of all stakeholders. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to facilitate the provision of telecommunications services and infrastructure in a manner that promotes competition, innovation, and consumer choice while safeguarding public interest and ensuring efficient use of the radio spectrum.
The revocation of the nominated carrier declaration for Opticomm Pty Ltd, as detailed in the gazette, illustrates the regulatory oversight exercised by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) under the Act. This action taken on 26 October 2022 by Dominic Byrne, a delegate of the ACMA, underscores the importance of compliance with the Act's provisions and the authority's role in enforcing these regulations to maintain the integrity of the telecommunications network. The revocation was made in response to Opticomm Pty Ltd's notification that it no longer accepts responsibility for the network units, which aligns with the statutory framework designed to ensure accountability and reliability within the telecommunications sector.
Scope and Application
The Telecommunications Act 1997, as applied in the context of the revocation of a nominated carrier declaration for Opticomm Pty Ltd, applies to entities such as Opticomm that have been granted a declaration as a nominated carrier, in this instance concerning network units owned by Sanctuary Cove Communication Services Unit Trust. The Act provides the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with the authority to regulate telecommunications services and infrastructure within Australia, impacting various entities and industries reliant on telecommunications networks. The revocation of the nominated carrier declaration under section 83(2)(b) of the Act underscores the ACMA's oversight role in ensuring entities maintain their responsibilities and compliance with telecommunications regulations. The jurisdictional reach of this Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby governing the operations and responsibilities of telecommunications entities uniformly. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions detailed within the scope of this revocation, although the Act does provide for various exclusions and exemptions in other contexts, often delineated through subordinate instruments or specific provisions within the Act itself.
Key Provisions
The Telecommunications Act 1997 contains provisions that allow the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to revoke a nominated carrier declaration under certain circumstances. In this instance, section 83(2)(b) of the Act (paragraph 83(2)(b)) permits the ACMA to revoke such a declaration if a nominated carrier, in this case Opticomm Pty Ltd, provides written notice that it no longer accepts responsibility for the network units covered by the declaration. This power was exercised by Dominic Byrne, a delegate of the ACMA, in relation to the Nominated Carrier Declaration granted to Opticomm Pty Ltd on 2 May 2019 for network units owned by Sanctuary Cove Communication Services Unit Trust. This revocation followed Opticomm Pty Ltd's written notice to the ACMA stating its decision not to accept responsibility for the network units under the Telecommunications Act 1997.
The Act imposes certain obligations on parties like Opticomm Pty Ltd, who are granted a nominated carrier declaration. The primary obligation is to maintain the responsibility for the network units specified in the declaration. By accepting such a declaration, Opticomm Pty Ltd agreed to ensure that the network units comply with the relevant telecommunications laws and regulations. This includes fulfilling any technical and operational standards set forth by the ACMA. However, if Opticomm Pty Ltd no longer wishes to uphold these obligations, it must notify the ACMA in writing, leading to the potential revocation of the declaration as occurred in this instance.
Breaching the terms of the nominated carrier declaration can lead to significant consequences. Under the Telecommunications Act 1997, the ACMA has the authority to revoke the declaration if Opticomm Pty Ltd fails to maintain its responsibilities or provides written notice of relinquishing its duties. This revocation can result in Opticomm Pty Ltd losing its status as a nominated carrier, potentially affecting its operations and any contractual agreements tied to this status. While the specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in the revocation notice, they could include fines or other legal actions under the broader provisions of the Act. The precise penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach.