Â
Â
Â
Revocation of Authority to carry on banking business
Â
Banking Act 1959
Â
Â
Â
SINCE
Â
A. on 22 February 2013 Societe Generale ABN 71 092 516 286 (the ADI) applied in writing to APRA under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia (the Authority); and
Â
B. I am satisfied that revocation of the Authority:
(i)Â would not be contrary to the national interest; and
(ii)Â would not be contrary to the interests of the depositors of the ADI,
Â
I, Keith Chapman, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, REVOKE the
Authority with effect from 26 March 2013.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Dated: 26 March 2013Â Â Â Â
Â
Â
[Signed]
Â
Â
Keith Chapman
Executive General Manager
Diversified Institutions Division
Interpretation Document ID: 207500
Â
In this Notice
Â
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
Â
ADI is short for authorised deposit-taking institution and has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Â
banking business has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Â
Note 1
Under subsection 9A(5A) of the Act, the notice of revocation of the authority may state that the
authority continues in effect in relation to a specified matter or specified period, as though the revocation had not happened, for the purposes of a specified provision of the Act or the regulations, or a specified provision of another law of the Commonwealth that is administered by APRA, or a specified provision of the prudential standards, and the statement has effect accordingly.
Â
Note 2
Under subsection 9A(6) of the Act, APRA must publish a copy of this Notice in the Gazette and
may cause notice of the revocation to be published in any other way it considers appropriate.
Â
Note 3
Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, a body corporate is guilty of an offence if the body corporate
carries on banking business in Australia and the body corporate is not the Reserve Bank and the body
corporate is not an ADI and there is no order in force under section 11 of the Act determining that subsection 8 (1) does not apply to the body corporate. A penalty of 200 penalty units applies or by virtue of subsection 4B (3) of the Crimes Act 1914 in the case of a body corporate, a penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. By virtue of subsection 8(2) of the Act, an offence against subsection 8(1) is an indictable offence. Under subsection 8(3) of the Act, if a body corporate commits an offence against subsection 8(1), the body corporate is guilty of an offence against that subsection in respect of the first day on which the offence is committed and each subsequent day (if any) on which the circumstances that gave rise to the body corporate committing the offence continue (including the day of conviction for any such offence or any later day).
Overview
The Banking Act 1959 was enacted to establish a framework for the regulation of banking institutions in Australia, ensuring financial stability and protecting the interests of depositors. The Act, administered by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), provides a mechanism for the revocation of an authorised deposit-taking institution's (ADI) authority to carry on banking business if deemed necessary. This legislative framework was introduced to address the need for a structured approach to managing banking activities, safeguarding depositor interests, and maintaining the integrity of the financial system. The revocation of Societe Generale's authority under this Act, as seen in the revocation notice dated 26 March 2013, demonstrates the Act's role in enforcing compliance and mitigating risks within the banking sector.
Scope and Application
The Banking Act 1959 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), which are entities authorised to carry on banking business in Australia. The Act outlines the conditions under which a bank can operate and mandates that only ADIs can legally conduct banking business in the country. The Act has a national reach and is administered by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). The revocation of an ADI's authority to carry on banking business is explicitly detailed in the Act, which allows APRA to revoke an institution's authority if it is not in the national interest or the interests of depositors. The revocation process involves a written application by the institution followed by APRA's assessment and subsequent decision. The Act allows for the revocation to be subject to conditions, such as continuing certain provisions for specified periods or matters. Offences related to unauthorised banking business are also defined within the Act, with penalties for non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the document concern the revocation of the Authority of Societe Generale to carry on banking business in Australia. This revocation, effective from 26 March 2013, was authorised by Keith Chapman, a delegate of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act). The authority is revoked based on an application made by Societe Generale and the delegate's satisfaction that such revocation would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of depositors (subsection 9A(1)).
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For example, under subsection 9A(5A) of the Act, the notice of revocation may specify that the authority continues for certain purposes or periods, notwithstanding the revocation. This allows for certain operations to continue under specific conditions. Furthermore, under subsection 8(1) of the Act, it is an offence for a body corporate to carry on banking business in Australia without being an authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI) or the Reserve Bank, unless exempted by an order under section 11 of the Act.
Offences and penalties are outlined in the Act, with particular attention to subsection 8(1). A body corporate found guilty of carrying on banking business without the required authorisation faces a penalty of up to 200 penalty units or 1,000 penalty units under the Crimes Act 1914, depending on the nature of the offence. This offence is classified as an indictable offence, and if the unlawful activity continues, the body corporate can be charged for each day the offence persists, including the day of conviction and any subsequent days. Under subsection 8(3), the body corporate is liable for the offence from the first day it is committed until the circumstances that led to the offence are resolved.