Revocation of Authority to carry on banking business
Banking Act 1959
SINCE
- on 26 November 2015 Shell Employees' Credit Union Limited ABN 74 087 650 646 (the ADI) applied in writing to APRA under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia (the Authority); and
B. I am satisfied that revocation of the Authority:
(i) would not be contrary to the national interest; and
(ii) would not be contrary to the interests of the depositors of the ADI,
I, Keith Chapman, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, REVOKE the Authority.
Dated 11 April 2016
[Signed]
Keith Chapman
Executive General Manager Specialised Institutions Division
Interpretation Document ID: 221700
In this Notice
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
ADI is short for authorised deposit-taking institution and has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
banking business has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Note 1
Under subsection 9A(5A) of the Act, the notice of revocation of the authority may state that the
authority continues in effect in relation to a specified matter or specified period, as though the revocation had not happened, for the purposes of a specified provision of the Act or the regulations, or a specified provision of another law of the Commonwealth that is administered by APRA, or a specified provision of the prudential standards, and the statement has effect accordingly.
Note 2
Under subsection 9A(6) of the Act, APRA must publish a copy of this Notice in the Gazette and
may cause notice of the revocation to be published in any other way it considers appropriate.
Note 3
Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, a body corporate is guilty of an offence if the body corporate
carries on banking business in Australia and the body corporate is not the Reserve Bank and the body corporate is not an ADI and there is no order in force under section 11 of the Act determining that subsection 8
(1) does not apply to the body corporate. A penalty of 200 penalty units applies or by virtue of subsection 4B
(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 in the case of a body corporate, a penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. By virtue of subsection 8(2) of the Act, an offence against subsection 8(1) is an indictable offence. Under subsection 8(3) of the Act, if a body corporate commits an offence against subsection 8(1), the body corporate is guilty of an offence against that subsection in respect of the first day on which the offence is committed and each subsequent day (if any) on which the circumstances that gave rise to the body corporate committing the offence continue (including the day of conviction for any such offence or any later day).
Overview
The Banking Act 1959, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, was introduced to regulate the banking industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of depositors and maintaining financial stability. The Act provides the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) with the authority to regulate authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and to revoke their authority to carry on banking business under certain circumstances. The revocation of a Shell Employees' Credit Union Limited's authority to carry on banking business, as outlined in the gazetted notice, serves to maintain the integrity of the banking system and protect the interests of depositors, while also upholding the national interest. The policy objective of the Banking Act 1959 is to safeguard the stability and efficiency of the Australian financial system by regulating and supervising authorised deposit-taking institutions.
Scope and Application
The Banking Act 1959 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and any entity carrying on banking business in Australia, including Shell Employees' Credit Union Limited, as demonstrated in the revocation of its banking authority by APRA. The Act governs the scope of banking activities that ADIs can undertake, with a specific focus on maintaining financial stability and protecting depositors. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, extending across all states and territories of Australia. Notably, the Act does not apply to the Reserve Bank of Australia or to any entity that is specifically exempted by an order under section 11 of the Act. The revocation of banking authority can occur under specific conditions set out in the Act, as exemplified by Shell Employees' Credit Union Limited's application and APRA's subsequent decision, ensuring that the revocation does not adversely affect the national interest or depositors. The Act also imposes penalties on body corporates that engage in banking business without the requisite authority, highlighting the importance of compliance with its provisions.
Key Provisions
The key operative section of the legislation, subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959, allows for the revocation of the authority of an authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI) to carry on banking business in Australia. This is achieved when an ADI applies in writing to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to revoke its authority. Keith Chapman, a delegate of APRA, has exercised this power by revoking the authority of Shell Employees' Credit Union Limited (the ADI), effective from 26 November 2015. The revocation was made on 11 April 2016 and is subject to certain conditions, such as ensuring that the revocation does not compromise the national interest or the interests of the ADI's depositors.
The Banking Act 1959 imposes specific obligations on ADIs, including the requirement to maintain a certain standard of financial health and to comply with all regulatory requirements set forth by APRA. These obligations are designed to protect the interests of depositors and to maintain the stability of the financial system. When an ADI applies to revoke its authority, APRA is required to assess whether the revocation would be in the best interests of the public and the depositors. This involves a thorough review to ensure that the revocation does not pose any risks to the national interest or financial stability.
Breaching the provisions of the Banking Act 1959 can lead to significant penalties and consequences. Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, any body corporate that carries on banking business in Australia without the requisite authorisation commits an offence. This offence is considered indictable, and the penalties can be substantial. A body corporate can face a fine of up to 200 penalty units, or alternatively, under the Crimes Act 1914, a penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that if the unauthorised banking activity continues, the body corporate is guilty of an offence for each day that the activity persists, including the day of conviction and any subsequent days. This stringent approach underscores the importance of adhering to the regulatory framework governing banking activities in Australia.