Revocation of Authority to carry on banking business
Banking Act 1959
SINCE
- on 4 September 2017 My Credit Union Limited ABN 59 087 650 584 (the ADI) applied in writing to APRA under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia (the Authority); and
B. I am satisfied that revocation of the Authority:
(i) would not be contrary to the national interest; and
(ii) would not be contrary to the interests of the depositors of the ADI;
I, Mark Adams, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, REVOKE the Authority with effect from 1 March 2018.
Dated: 14 February 2018
[Signed]
Mark Adams
Executive General Manager Specialised Institutions Division
Interpretation Document ID: 227922
In this Notice
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
ADI is short for authorised deposit-taking institution and has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
banking business has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Note 1 Under subsection 9A(6) of the Act, APRA must publish a copy of this Notice in the Gazette and
may cause notice of the revocation to be published in any other way it considers appropriate.
Note 2 Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, a body corporate is guilty of an offence if the body corporate
carries on banking business in Australia and the body corporate is not the Reserve Bank and the body corporate is not an ADI and there is no order in force under section 11 of the Act determining that subsection 8
(1) does not apply to the body corporate. A maximum penalty of 200 penalty units applies or by virtue of subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 in the case of a body corporate, a maximum penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. By virtue of subsection 8(2) of the Act, an offence against subsection 8(1) is an indictable offence. Under subsection 8(3) of the Act, if a body corporate commits an offence against subsection 8(1), the body corporate is guilty of an offence against that subsection in respect of the first day on which the offence is committed and each subsequent day (if any) on which the circumstances that gave rise to the body corporate committing the offence continue (including the day of conviction for any such offence or any later day).
Overview
The Banking Act 1959 was enacted to regulate and supervise the banking sector in Australia, ensuring stability and integrity within the financial system. This legislation addresses the need for a robust framework to manage banking activities, protect depositors, and maintain confidence in the financial system. The Act empowers the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to oversee authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and enforce compliance with regulatory standards. The problem it addresses includes the prevention of unauthorised entities from engaging in banking activities, thus protecting the interests of consumers and maintaining the stability of the financial system. The enactment of this Act by the Australian Parliament aims to safeguard the financial sector by providing clear guidelines and regulatory oversight, thereby promoting a stable and trustworthy banking environment.
Scope and Application
The Banking Act 1959 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and any other body corporate engaged in banking business in Australia, with specific exceptions for the Reserve Bank of Australia and entities exempted under section 11 of the Act. The Act imposes strict requirements on who can carry on banking business, with significant penalties for non-compliance, including fines of up to 200 penalty units or 1,000 penalty units in the case of a body corporate, as stipulated in the Crimes Act 1914. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act’s provisions are enforced by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which has the authority to revoke an ADI’s licence under subsection 9A(1) if it is satisfied that such action is not contrary to the national interest or the interests of depositors. APRA’s decision to revoke the Authority, as demonstrated in the revocation of My Credit Union Limited’s banking licence, must be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and informing the public of changes in authorised banking entities.
Key Provisions
The Banking Act 1959, specifically section 9A(1), enables a delegate of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to revoke an authorised deposit-taking institution's (ADI) authority to carry on banking business in Australia. In this case, Mark Adams, a delegate of APRA, revoked My Credit Union Limited’s (the ADI) authority to carry on banking business in Australia, effective from 1 March 2018. This revocation was made under the condition that it would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of the ADI’s depositors. This revocation is documented and published in the Gazette as required by subsection 9A(6) of the Act.
The obligations imposed by the Banking Act 1959 on the ADI include adherence to the terms of its authority to carry on banking business and ensuring that its operations do not contravene the national interest or depositors' interests. Additionally, the ADI must ensure it remains compliant with all other relevant provisions of the Act and any other regulatory requirements set forth by APRA. The Act also mandates that APRA must verify that the revocation does not adversely affect the national interest or the depositors before proceeding with the revocation.
In terms of legal consequences, the Banking Act 1959, under subsection 8(1), imposes an indictable offence on any body corporate that carries on banking business in Australia without the requisite authorisation. The maximum penalty for this offence is 200 penalty units, or in the case of a body corporate, up to 1,000 penalty units as stipulated in subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914. This offence continues for each day the unauthorised activity persists, including the day of conviction and any subsequent days. The Act further stipulates under subsection 8(3) that if a body corporate commits such an offence, it is guilty of an offence for each day the unauthorised activity continues.