Revocation of Authority to carry on banking business
Banking Act 1959
SINCE
- on 21 December 2018, Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd ABN 64 087 650 164 (the ADI) applied in writing to APRA under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia (the Authority); and
B. I am satisfied that revocation of the Authority:
(i) would not be contrary to the national interest; and
(ii) would not be contrary to the interests of the depositors of the ADI;
I, Wayne Byres, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, REVOKE the Authority with effect from 1 July 2019.
Dated 28 June 2019
[Signed]
...............................................................................
Wayne Byres Chairman
Interpretation Document ID: 234867
In this Notice
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
ADI is short for authorised deposit-taking institution and has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
banking business has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Note 1 Under subsection 9A(6) of the Act, APRA must publish a copy of this Notice in the Gazette and
may cause notice of the revocation to be published in any other way it considers appropriate.
Note 2 Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, a body corporate is guilty of an offence if the body corporate
carries on banking business in Australia and the body corporate is not the Reserve Bank and the body corporate is not an ADI and there is no order in force under section 11 of the Act determining that subsection 8
(1) does not apply to the body corporate. A maximum penalty of 200 penalty units applies or by virtue of subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 in the case of a body corporate, a maximum penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. By virtue of subsection 8(2) of the Act, an offence against subsection 8(1) is an indictable offence. Under subsection 8(3) of the Act, if a body corporate commits an offence against subsection 8(1), the body corporate is guilty of an offence against that subsection in respect of the first day on which the offence is committed and each subsequent day (if any) on which the circumstances that gave rise to the body corporate committing the offence continue (including the day of conviction for any such offence or any later day).
Overview
The Banking Act 1959 was enacted to regulate the banking sector in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of depositors and maintain the stability of the financial system. On 21 December 2018, Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd applied to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia. The revocation was approved on 28 June 2019 by a delegate of APRA, Wayne Byres, who was satisfied that the revocation would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of the depositors of the ADI. The revocation was published in the Gazette and through other appropriate means, in accordance with the Act. This revocation serves as a measure to ensure compliance with the Act and to prevent unauthorised entities from engaging in banking activities within Australia.
Scope and Application
The Banking Act 1959 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADI) and other entities carrying on banking business in Australia. Specifically, it regulates the revocation of the authority of an ADI to carry on such business, as demonstrated in the revocation of Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd’s authority. The Act extends its reach to any body corporate conducting banking business without proper authorisation, with severe penalties for non-compliance. The revocation process, as outlined in the Act, involves a written application to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), followed by APRA's satisfaction that the revocation would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of the depositors. Once satisfied, APRA may revoke the authority, as evidenced by the revocation of Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd's authority with effect from 1 July 2019. APRA is mandated to publish such revocation notices in the Gazette and may choose other appropriate means of publication. Any body corporate found to be carrying on banking business without authorisation faces an indictable offence with significant penalties, underscoring the strict enforcement of the Act's provisions.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of this legislation concern the revocation of the authority of Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd to carry on banking business in Australia, as provided under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959. This revocation was made on the basis that it would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of the depositors, and it took effect from 1 July 2019. This revocation was published in the Gazette as required by subsection 9A(6) of the Act. The document, signed by Wayne Byres, a delegate of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), details the reasons and the date of the revocation.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the ADI, which in this case is Holiday Coast Credit Union Ltd. The ADI must comply with the conditions set out by APRA and adhere to the statutory framework provided by the Banking Act 1959. The Act mandates that an authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI) must not carry on banking business in Australia unless it is the Reserve Bank or has been granted a specific order under section 11 of the Act. The revocation notice ensures that the ADI ceases its operations as per the stipulated date, and any further banking activities would be unlawful without appropriate authorisation.
In terms of legal consequences, the Banking Act 1959 stipulates that any body corporate carrying on banking business without the necessary authorisation commits an offence. Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, such an offence is considered indictable, and the penalties are severe. A body corporate can face a maximum penalty of 200 penalty units, which can escalate to 1,000 penalty units according to subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914. Furthermore, the Act specifies that the offence is ongoing for each day the unauthorised activity continues, starting from the first day of the offence and including the day of conviction or any subsequent days. This rigorous enforcement underscores the importance of compliance with the Act's provisions regarding banking business authorisation.