Revocation of Authority to carry on banking business
Banking Act 1959
SINCE
- on 23 June 2016 Banco Santander, S.A. ARBN 081 746 170 (the ADI) applied in writing to APRA under subsection 9A(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), to revoke its authority to carry on banking business in Australia (the Authority); and
B. I am satisfied that revocation of the Authority:
(i) would not be contrary to the national interest; and
(ii) would not be contrary to the interests of the depositors of the ADI,
I, Keith Chapman, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, REVOKE the Authority.
Dated: 23 February 2017
[Signed]
Keith Chapman
Executive General Manager Specialised Institutions Division
Interpretation Document ID: 226339
In this Notice
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
ADI is short for authorised deposit-taking institution and has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
banking business has the meaning given in subsection 5(1) of the Act.
Note 1
Under subsection 9A(5A) of the Act, the notice of revocation of the authority may state that the
authority continues in effect in relation to a specified matter or specified period, as though the revocation had not happened, for the purposes of a specified provision of the Act or the regulations, or a specified provision of another law of the Commonwealth that is administered by APRA, or a specified provision of the prudential standards, and the statement has effect accordingly.
Note 2
Under subsection 9A(6) of the Act, APRA must publish a copy of this Notice in the Gazette and
may cause notice of the revocation to be published in any other way it considers appropriate.
Note 3
Under subsection 8(1) of the Act, a body corporate is guilty of an offence if the body corporate
carries on banking business in Australia and the body corporate is not the Reserve Bank and the body corporate is not an ADI and there is no order in force under section 11 of the Act determining that subsection 8
(1) does not apply to the body corporate. A penalty of 200 penalty units applies or by virtue of subsection 4B
(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 in the case of a body corporate, a penalty not exceeding 1,000 penalty units. By virtue of subsection 8(2) of the Act, an offence against subsection 8(1) is an indictable offence. Under subsection 8(3) of the Act, if a body corporate commits an offence against subsection 8(1), the body corporate is guilty of an offence against that subsection in respect of the first day on which the offence is committed and each subsequent day (if any) on which the circumstances that gave rise to the body corporate committing the offence continue (including the day of conviction for any such offence or any later day).
Overview
The Banking Act 1959 was enacted to regulate the banking industry in Australia, ensuring financial stability and protecting depositors. One of the key provisions of this Act is the ability for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to revoke an authorised deposit-taking institution's (ADI) authority to carry on banking business in Australia if certain conditions are met. This mechanism was introduced to address the need for effective regulatory oversight and to safeguard the interests of depositors in case an ADI no longer meets the necessary regulatory standards. APRA, as the relevant regulatory body, has the authority to revoke an ADI's banking authority under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, ensuring that only institutions capable of maintaining financial stability and protecting depositors are permitted to operate in the Australian market.
Scope and Application
The Banking Act 1959 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), which are defined in the Act, and to any person or entity carrying on banking business in Australia. The Act governs the revocation of a banking authority, ensuring that only authorised institutions may conduct banking activities in the country. The Act's reach is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act. Keith Chapman, as a delegate of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), has the authority to revoke a banking institution's licence under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, subject to certain conditions such as the revocation not being contrary to the national interest or the interests of depositors. The revocation may continue in effect for certain specified matters or periods under subsection 9A(5A) of the Act. Any corporate body found to be conducting banking business without proper authorisation commits an offence under subsection 8(1), which carries a penalty as stipulated in the Act or the Crimes Act 1914.
Key Provisions
The Banking Act 1959 provides for the revocation of the authority of an authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI) to carry on banking business in Australia. Section 9A(1) allows an ADI to apply to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to revoke its authority, which APRA can do if it is satisfied that such revocation would not be contrary to the national interest or the interests of the ADI's depositors. In the case of Banco Santander, S.A., APRA received such an application on 23 June 2016 and, being satisfied of the conditions, revoked the institution's authority on 23 February 2017. This revocation was published in the Gazette as required by subsection 9A(6) of the Act.
The Banking Act 1959 imposes specific obligations on ADIs and APRA. For ADIs, the primary obligation is to comply with the conditions set out in the Act, including the requirement to maintain sufficient capital and liquidity, and to conduct their business in a safe and sound manner. APRA, on the other hand, is tasked with the responsibility of supervising ADIs to ensure they comply with these obligations. APRA also has the authority to revoke an ADI's authority under certain circumstances, as outlined in the Act. The revocation of Banco Santander, S.A.'s authority was carried out by Keith Chapman, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 9A(1) of the Act, and was published in the Gazette in accordance with the legislative requirements.
Breaching the provisions of the Banking Act 1959 can result in both civil and criminal consequences. Section 8(1) of the Act states that a body corporate is guilty of an offence if it carries on banking business in Australia without the necessary authority, with the penalty for such an offence being 200 penalty units, or up to 1,000 penalty units in the case of a body corporate. This offence is considered indictable, meaning it can be prosecuted in a higher court. If a body corporate commits such an offence, it is liable for the offence on the first day it is committed and each subsequent day the conditions persist. This includes the day of conviction and any later day. The revocation of Banco Santander, S.A.'s authority was carried out under the conditions specified in the Act to avoid such penalties and consequences.