Revocation of authorisation to carry on insurance business
Insurance Act 1973
TO: Sunderland Marine Insurance Company Limited ABN 89 007 508 401 (the insurer) 19 Agnes Street, East Melbourne VIC 3002
SINCE
- the insurer is authorised under subsection 12(2) of the Insurance Act 1973 (the Act), to carry on insurance business in Australia (the Authorisation); and
- the insurer has asked APRA to revoke the Authorisation; and
- I am satisfied that:
(i) the insurer has no liabilities in respect of insurance business carried on by it in Australia; and
(ii) revoking the Authorisation would not be contrary to the national interest.
I, Mark Adams, a delegate of APRA, under subsection 16(1) of the Act, REVOKE the Authorisation.
This Revocation takes effect on the date it is signed. Dated 25 January 2019
[Signed]
...............................................................................
Mark Adams
Executive General Manager Specialised Institutions Division
Interpretation Document ID: 232639
In this Notice
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
insurance business has the meaning given in section 3 of the Act.
Note 1 Under subsection 16(2) of the Act, if APRA revokes a general insurer’s authorisation, APRA must give
written notice to the insurer and ensure that notice of the revocation is published in the Gazette. By virtue of subsection 16(3) of the Act, a revocation is not invalid merely because of a failure to comply with subsection 16(2) of the Act.
Overview
The Insurance Act 1973, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was introduced to address the need for regulation and oversight of the insurance industry to protect policyholders and ensure financial stability. The Act provides the framework for authorising insurance companies to operate in Australia, and includes provisions for the supervision and regulation of these entities by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). One of the key functions of APRA under the Act is the ability to revoke an insurer's authorisation to carry on insurance business if certain conditions are met. In this instance, the revocation of Sunderland Marine Insurance Company Limited's authorisation is in accordance with subsection 12(2) and 16(1) of the Act, following a request from the insurer and confirmation that no liabilities exist and that revocation does not contravene the national interest. This revocation, dated 25 January 2019, was carried out by a delegate of APRA, and the decision was published in the Gazette as required by the Act.
Scope and Application
The Insurance Act 1973 applies to entities authorised to carry on insurance business in Australia, including Sunderland Marine Insurance Company Limited. The Act covers the conduct and transactions of these entities, ensuring they adhere to regulatory standards. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, including all states and territories. The Act’s provisions can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for adjustments in regulatory requirements. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but the revocation of an insurer’s authorisation can occur if certain conditions, such as the absence of liabilities and the absence of any contrary national interest, are met. This revocation process is detailed in the Act, ensuring transparency and compliance with statutory obligations.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the document include subsection 12(2) of the Insurance Act 1973, which initially authorised the insurer to carry on insurance business in Australia, and subsection 16(1) of the same Act, which empowers APRA to revoke such authorisation. The revocation notice states that the authorisation to carry on insurance business is revoked because the insurer has requested it and there are no outstanding liabilities, and the revocation is not contrary to the national interest. This revocation takes immediate effect upon signing.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the insurer primarily involve ensuring that there are no outstanding liabilities related to the insurance business carried out in Australia. Additionally, APRA, as the regulatory authority, has the obligation to provide written notice of the revocation to the insurer and ensure that the revocation is published in the Gazette. Despite the requirement for notice and publication, the Act specifies that failure to comply with these requirements does not invalidate the revocation.
The document outlines potential consequences for breaches of the Insurance Act 1973. While the specific penalties for breaches are not detailed within this revocation notice, the Act generally provides for both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines, and in more severe cases, criminal penalties can apply, leading to imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in other sections of the Act.