Revocation of approval to hold a stake in a financial sector company of more than 15%
Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998
To: Southern Cross Health Trust and the persons named in the attached Schedule (the applicants)
SINCE
- The applicants hold approvals dated 31 March 2009 and 24 August 2009 (the Approvals) under subsection 14(1) of the Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 (the Act), to hold a stake of 100% in Southern Cross Benefits Limited ABN 99 133 401 939, a financial sector company under the Act; and
B. the applicants have requested that the Approvals be revoked,
I, Nigel Boik, a delegate of the Treasurer, under subsection 18(3) of the Act, REVOKE the Approvals.
This revocation comes into force on the date it is signed.
Dated: 10 October 2013
[Signed]
Nigel Boik
General Manager
Specialised Institutions Division
Interpretation
In this Notice:
financial sector company has the meaning given in section 3 of the Act.
stake in relation to a company, has the meaning given in clause 10 of Schedule 1 to the Act.
Schedule – the persons who applied for revocation
Jeffrey Garfield Todd
Carole Durbin
David May
Graeme Scott Hawkins
Douglas Donald Baird
Phillip James Meyer
Mark John Verbiest
Donald Harley Gray
Activa Health Limited
Southern Cross Health Services Limited
Southern Cross Hospitals Services Limited
Southern Cross Medical Care Society
Overview
The Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 was enacted to address the need for regulatory oversight over significant shareholdings in financial sector companies. This legislation was introduced by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of ensuring the stability and integrity of the financial sector by preventing undue influence and potential conflicts of interest arising from substantial shareholdings. The Act empowers the Treasurer to approve or revoke shareholdings exceeding 15% in financial sector companies. In this context, the Act aims to maintain public confidence in financial institutions by managing the concentration of ownership and control within the sector. The revocation of shareholding approvals, as demonstrated in the revocation of the Southern Cross Health Trust's 100% stake in Southern Cross Benefits Limited, reflects the Act's role in dynamically responding to changes in the ownership structure of financial sector entities.
Scope and Application
The Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 applies to entities and individuals holding a stake of more than 15% in a financial sector company, as defined in section 3 of the Act. This legislation is designed to regulate and monitor significant shareholdings within the financial sector to ensure stability and compliance with financial sector regulations. The Act applies to the applicants mentioned in the attached schedule, who collectively hold a 100% stake in Southern Cross Benefits Limited, a financial sector company. The revocation of their approval to hold this stake is effective from the date of signing by the delegate of the Treasurer, Nigel Boik. This revocation pertains to the Commonwealth jurisdiction, governing the shareholding structures within the financial sector across Australia. Notably, the Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but its application may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, ensuring that significant shareholdings remain within the bounds of regulatory oversight.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the revocation notice revolve around the cancellation of specific approvals held by the applicants under the Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998. The notice revokes the approvals, dated 31 March 2009 and 24 August 2009, which permitted the applicants to hold a 100% stake in Southern Cross Benefits Limited, a financial sector company (sections 14(1), 18(3)). The revocation was enacted due to the applicants' request, which is clearly stated in the document. This revocation signifies the end of the applicants' authority to maintain the specified shareholding in the financial sector company, effective immediately upon signing.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties involved are primarily centred around the conditions under which shareholdings in financial sector companies can be held. Under section 14(1) of the Act, the initial approvals granted to the applicants allowed them to hold a significant stake in Southern Cross Benefits Limited. These approvals came with specific conditions and were subject to the Act’s oversight. The applicants, in this case, have now fulfilled their request to revoke these approvals, thereby relinquishing their rights and responsibilities related to the shareholding. This action aligns with the regulatory framework intended to manage and monitor significant holdings in the financial sector to ensure stability and compliance with legislative standards.
The Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 also outlines the consequences of non-compliance or breaches of its provisions. Although the revocation notice itself does not detail specific penalties for non-compliance, the Act generally provides for enforcement mechanisms, including the potential for legal action. Failure to adhere to the Act’s requirements could result in civil or criminal liabilities, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The maximum penalties for breaches of such financial sector regulations can include substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment, reflecting the critical nature of maintaining financial stability and regulatory compliance within the sector.
Additionally, the revocation notice includes a list of the individuals and entities involved in the application process, which ensures transparency and clarity regarding who is affected by the revocation. This includes individuals such as Jeffrey Garfield Todd, Carole Durbin, David May, Graeme Scott Hawkins, Douglas Donald Baird, Phillip James Meyer, Mark John Verbiest, and Donald Harley Gray, as well as corporate entities like Activa Health Limited, Southern Cross Health Services Limited, Southern Cross Hospitals Services Limited, and Southern Cross Medical Care Society. This comprehensive list confirms that the revocation applies to all named parties, effectively terminating their previous authorisations under the Act.