REPRESENTATION.
No. 73 of 1930.
An Act relating to the Appointment of an Enumeration Day for the purposes of the Representation Act 1905.
[Assented to 16th December, 1930.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title.
1. This Act may be cited as the Representation Act 1930.
Enumeration Day not to be appointed.
2. Notwithstanding anything contained in section three of the Representation Act 1905, the Chief Electoral Officer shall not appoint an Enumeration Day at the expiration of the fifth year after the Enumeration Day last appointed prior to the commencement of this section.
Overview
The Representation Act 1930, enacted by the Australian Parliament on 16th December 1930, was designed to address a specific issue within the Representation Act 1905 concerning the appointment of an Enumeration Day. The Representation Act 1905 had established provisions for determining the date for the enumeration of the Commonwealth's population, crucial for electoral representation and distribution of seats. However, the Representation Act 1930 was introduced to ensure that the Chief Electoral Officer could not appoint a new Enumeration Day until a certain period had elapsed since the last enumeration. This legislative measure aimed to provide stability and predictability in the electoral process by preventing frequent changes in the enumeration schedule. The Act reflects a policy objective to maintain consistency in the electoral framework and ensure that the population census for electoral purposes is conducted at appropriate intervals.
Scope and Application
The Representation Act 1930 applies to the Commonwealth of Australia and pertains specifically to the procedures outlined in the Representation Act 1905 concerning the appointment of an Enumeration Day. This Act is designed to modify the timing of such appointments, ensuring that there is a minimum interval of five years between the last appointed Enumeration Day and any subsequent one. The Act does not extend to any particular person, entity, industry, or specific conduct, but rather it regulates the administrative process of setting Enumeration Days as per the Representation Act 1905. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the text of this Act itself, and its application is confined to the administrative actions of the Chief Electoral Officer in relation to Enumeration Day appointments. This Act operates within the jurisdictional scope of the Commonwealth and does not extend beyond it unless further specified through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional details or conditions regarding the implementation of this legislation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Representation Act 1930 are straightforward. Section 1 provides the Act with its short title, while Section 2 introduces a critical amendment to the Representation Act 1905. Specifically, Section 2 stipulates that the Chief Electoral Officer is prohibited from appointing an Enumeration Day at the expiration of the fifth year after the last appointed Enumeration Day before the commencement of this Act (Section 2). This amendment effectively delays the scheduling of any new Enumeration Day, impacting the timeline for electoral processes.
Under this Act, the Chief Electoral Officer is given explicit instructions on the timing of Enumeration Days, which are essential for updating the electoral roll. The Act imposes a clear obligation on the Chief Electoral Officer to adhere to the new timeline set out in Section 2, ensuring that an Enumeration Day is not appointed within the first five years after the last such day. This restriction is intended to manage the frequency and timing of the electoral roll updates, thereby maintaining the integrity and accuracy of electoral records.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance, the Act does not explicitly outline offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, the failure to adhere to the timelines and directives set out in Section 2 could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative issues. Given the critical nature of accurate electoral rolls, any deviation from the prescribed timeline might result in significant implications for electoral processes, even if specific penalties are not detailed within the Act itself.