REPATRIATION (FAR EAST STRATEGIC RESERVE.)
No. 90 of 1962.
An Act to amend section three of the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1956 in consequence of the enactment of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962, and to amend section thirteen of the first-mentioned Act.
[Assented to 14th December, 1962.]
BE it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title and citation.
1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1962.
(2.) The Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1956 is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.
(3.) The Principal Act, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1956-1962.
Commencement.
2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962 comes into operation.
Interpretation.
3. Section three of the Principal Act is amended by inserting after sub-section (3.) the following sub-section:—
“(3a.) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, the Malayan service of a member of the Forces does not include service after the commencement of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962.”.
Regulations.
4. Section thirteen of the Principal Act is amended by omitting paragraph (a) of sub-section (1.) and inserting in its stead the following paragraphs:—
“(a) the granting of assistance and benefits to—
(i) members of the Forces;
(ii) children (including step-children, adopted children and ex-nuptial children) of members of the Forces, whether under the age of sixteen years or not;
(iii) dependants (as defined by the regulations), other than children, of members of the Forces; and
(iv) persons to whom section eight of this Act applies;
“(aa) the granting of assistance by way of payment of funeral expenses in respect of any of the persons referred to in the last preceding paragraph; and”.
Overview
The Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1962 was enacted to amend the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1956, addressing the legislative gaps arising from the introduction of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962. The Act was passed by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, with the aim of ensuring that the provisions of the 1956 Act are appropriately aligned with the new 1962 Act. The policy objective of the Act is to clarify the scope of repatriation benefits and assistance, particularly in relation to the services rendered in the Far East, ensuring that the newly established framework for special overseas service is properly integrated into existing legislation.
This Act introduces amendments to specific sections of the Principal Act, primarily to refine the eligibility criteria for repatriation assistance and benefits, ensuring that the services of members of the Forces, their children, and dependants are accurately reflected in the legal provisions. By doing so, it aims to provide a more precise and effective framework for the administration of repatriation benefits.
Scope and Application
The Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1962 applies to members of the Australian Defence Force who served in Malaya and their dependants, with a specific amendment excluding service after the commencement of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962. This Act extends to the whole of Australia and is a Commonwealth law, thereby providing a uniform approach to the provision of assistance and benefits across the nation. The Act provides for the granting of assistance and benefits to members of the Forces, their children and other dependants, and certain other individuals, including the payment of funeral expenses. The Act's provisions can be further detailed and specified through subordinate regulations, which may define terms such as "dependants" and set out other criteria for the provision of assistance and benefits.
Key Provisions
The Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1962 primarily amends the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1956, as referenced in section 1, by incorporating changes in light of the enactment of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962. Section 3(3a) introduces a critical amendment that excludes service after the commencement of the Repatriation (Special Overseas Service) Act 1962 from the definition of Malayan service for members of the Forces. This means that any service rendered by members of the Forces after the new Act comes into effect will not be considered part of their Malayan service under the previous legislation.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act are primarily directed at ensuring that the definitions and scope of assistance and benefits provided to members of the Forces and their dependants are updated and aligned with the changes brought by the new Act. Section 4 amends section thirteen of the Principal Act by expanding the categories of individuals eligible for assistance and benefits. This includes members of the Forces, their children, other dependants, and persons covered by section eight of the Act. Additionally, it mandates the provision of funeral assistance for these eligible persons, as stated in section 4(aa). These amendments ensure that the legislation reflects the current scope and intent of repatriation benefits for those affected by the service in the Far East.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches of its provisions. However, breaches of the Repatriation Act generally can lead to legal consequences. For instance, under the Repatriation Act 1949, which the Repatriation (Far East Strategic Reserve) Act 1962 operates under, there are provisions for penalties such as fines for false claims or fraudulent activities related to the benefits provided. The maximum penalties can vary, but they often include substantial fines that reflect the seriousness of the offence, as well as potential imprisonment in severe cases. These provisions underscore the importance of compliance with the legislative requirements governing repatriation benefits.