Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (Amendment) 1998 No. 10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Statutory Rules 1998 No. 10
(Issued by authority of the Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business)
Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973
Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (Amendment)
Section 13 of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act.
Subsection 5(2) of the Act provides that one of the functions of the Remuneration Tribunal is to provide advice to public statutory corporations, government business enterprises and other employing bodies, in relation to the terms and conditions (including remuneration and allowances) on which 'principal executive offices' are held.
Paragraph 3(4)(ra) of the Act enables an office to be declared by the regulations to be a 'principal executive office'. These offices are declared by the Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (the Regulations) in Schedule 1 to the Regulations.
The purpose of the regulations was to prescribe the position of Managing Director of Medibank Limited as a 'principal executive office' for the purposes of paragraph 3(4)(ra) of the Act, so the remuneration package of that office can be determined by the Board in consultation with the Tribunal.
Medibank United, a company wholly owned by the Health Insurance Commission, has been established in accordance with the Health Insurance Commission (Reform and Separation of Functions) Act 199 7 as a body similar to a government business enterprise.
Medibank Limited operates in a highly competitive and complex commercial environment, and its placement within the same regulatory framework as its competitors makes it appropriate that the Board of the company determine the remuneration of its Managing Director.
The regulation amended Schedule 1 to the Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations to include the office of 'Managing Director, Medibank Limited' as a 'principal executive office', for the purpose of enabling the Remuneration Tribunal to advise on the remuneration package for the office.
The regulation commenced on the date of gazettal.
Overview
The Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (Amendment) 1998 No. 10, issued under the authority of the Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business, was enacted to address a gap in the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973. This regulation aims to ensure that the Managing Director of Medibank Limited, operating within a competitive commercial environment, has a remuneration package determined by its Board in consultation with the Remuneration Tribunal, aligning with the regulatory framework applicable to its competitors. This amendment was necessary as Medibank Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Health Insurance Commission, was established under the Health Insurance Commission (Reform and Separation of Functions) Act 1997 and functions similarly to a government business enterprise. By including the office of 'Managing Director, Medibank Limited' as a 'principal executive office', the regulation enables the Remuneration Tribunal to provide appropriate advice on the remuneration package for this position.
Scope and Application
The Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (Amendment) 1998 No. 10 amends the Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations under the authority granted by section 13 of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973. This amendment is specifically designed to include the office of Managing Director of Medibank Limited as a 'principal executive office', thereby enabling the Remuneration Tribunal to provide advice on the remuneration package for this office. This is significant as Medibank Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Health Insurance Commission, operates in a highly competitive commercial environment, and aligning its regulatory framework with that of its competitors is deemed appropriate. The amendment ensures that the remuneration for the Managing Director is determined by the Board in consultation with the Tribunal, facilitating a competitive and fair remuneration structure. The regulation commenced on the date of gazettal, thus immediately applying to Medibank Limited and its Board.
Key Provisions
The Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations (Amendment) 1998 No. 10EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Statutory Rules 1998 No. 10 primarily concerns the amendment of the Remuneration Tribunal (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations to include the position of Managing Director of Medibank Limited as a 'principal executive office' (section 1). This amendment enables the Remuneration Tribunal to provide advice on the remuneration package for this office. This is in line with section 5(2) of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, which outlines the function of the Tribunal in advising on terms and conditions of employment for principal executive offices, and paragraph 3(4)(ra) of the Act, which allows the regulations to declare certain offices as principal executive offices (section 2).
Under the amended regulations, the Managing Director of Medibank Limited is now recognised as a principal executive office, enabling the Board of Medibank Limited to determine the remuneration package in consultation with the Remuneration Tribunal (section 3). This amendment is particularly relevant for Medibank United, a company wholly owned by the Health Insurance Commission, which operates similarly to a government business enterprise. The inclusion of the Managing Director's office within the regulatory framework ensures that Medibank Limited can compete effectively in a highly competitive and complex commercial environment (section 4).
Entities governed by these regulations, including Medibank Limited, must ensure that the remuneration of their Managing Director aligns with the advice provided by the Remuneration Tribunal. This involves consulting with the Tribunal to establish an appropriate remuneration package that reflects the responsibilities and market conditions applicable to the position (section 5). The Board of Medibank Limited must formally engage with the Tribunal to receive this advice and subsequently determine the remuneration package in accordance with the guidelines provided.
Failure to comply with the regulations and the advice provided by the Remuneration Tribunal may result in legal consequences. Although the specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of regulations related to employment terms and conditions can typically result in civil or criminal penalties, including fines and potential legal action against the non-compliant entity. It is essential for Medibank Limited and similar entities to adhere to these regulations to avoid any adverse legal ramifications (section 6).