REMUNERATION TRIBUNAL
Explanatory Statement: Determination 2010/20
Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Public Office
1. The Remuneration Tribunal has inquired into and determined the remuneration and significantly related matters for office holders, as it is empowered to do by the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
2. In making this determination the Tribunal has informed itself through consultation in accordance with established practice.
3. Any retrospective application of this determination is in accordance with subsection 12(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 as it does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth) to that person’s disadvantage, nor does it impose any liability on such a person.
PART 1 – FULL-TIME OFFICES
4. Clause 1.1 specifies the Principal Determination (Number 10 of 2010 as amended) for the purposes of Part 1 of the Determination.
5. Clauses 1.2 to 1.3 set an increased salary for superannuation purposes for the Freedom of Information Commissioner, Dr James Popple, while he occupies the office.
PART 2 – PART-TIME OFFICES
6. Clause 2.1 specifies the Principal Determination (Number 11 of 2010) for the purposes of Part 2 of the Determination.
7. Clause 2.2 corrects all references to the Anti-Doping Research Program Panel. The associated fees and entitlements have not been changed.
8. Clause 2.3 sets a person specific Audit and Risk Committee rate for the Hon Michael Knight to take into account his personal circumstances.
Authority: Sub-sections 7(3) and 7(4) of
the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
Overview
The Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 established the Remuneration Tribunal, which has the authority to determine the remuneration and allowances for office holders. The legislation was enacted to ensure that public office holders are compensated in a manner that is fair and reflective of their responsibilities. This is achieved through a structured process that includes consultation and consideration of various factors relevant to the office held. The 2010 determination made under this Act, F2010L03035, addresses remuneration for both full-time and part-time office holders, ensuring that the determinations are both timely and equitable. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and independence of public office holders by providing them with appropriate remuneration, thus preventing undue influence or conflicts of interest. The determinations made by the Tribunal aim to uphold these principles by setting specific remuneration rates and allowances based on individual circumstances and the nature of the office held.
Scope and Application
The Remuneration Tribunal Determination 2010/20 applies to remuneration and allowances for holders of public office as authorised by the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973. The scope of this legislation is broad, targeting office holders, including both full-time and part-time positions, within the public sector. This includes various public office holders whose remuneration is regulated and reviewed by the Remuneration Tribunal. The application of this determination is both national and jurisdictional, with the Remuneration Tribunal operating under Commonwealth authority. However, the specific implementation and application might vary across different states and territories within Australia, depending on the individual circumstances and roles of the office holders in question. The determination includes retrospective application under specific conditions as outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, ensuring that no adverse rights or liabilities are imposed on individuals other than the Commonwealth or its authorities. The legislation does not explicitly state exclusions or thresholds but adjusts remuneration based on specific roles and personal circumstances, such as the Freedom of Information Commissioner and members of the Anti-Doping Research Program Panel. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict the application of this determination, aligning with the evolving needs of public office remuneration.
Key Provisions
The Determination 2010/20 by the Remuneration Tribunal outlines specific remuneration and allowances for holders of public office, with references to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973. The Tribunal has determined the remuneration for various office holders through consultation, ensuring the process adheres to established practices. Importantly, any retrospective application of this determination is governed by subsection 12(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, ensuring it does not adversely affect individuals or impose new liabilities on them.
Regarding full-time offices, Clause 1.1 specifies the Principal Determination (Number 10 of 2010 as amended) for this section. Clauses 1.2 to 1.3 establish an increased salary for superannuation purposes for the Freedom of Information Commissioner, Dr James Popple, reflecting his tenure in the office. For part-time offices, Clause 2.1 refers to the Principal Determination (Number 11 of 2010) in Part 2 of the Determination. Clause 2.2 ensures that references to the Anti-Doping Research Program Panel are correctly updated, although the fees and entitlements remain unchanged. Clause 2.3 establishes a specific Audit and Risk Committee rate for the Hon Michael Knight, taking into account his personal circumstances.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Office holders and their representatives must ensure that any claims for remuneration and entitlements are accurate and justified. The Remuneration Tribunal is mandated to consult widely and consider all relevant factors in determining remuneration. The Tribunal must also ensure that any retrospective application of its determinations does not adversely affect individuals' rights or impose new liabilities, in line with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
The legislation also outlines the consequences for non-compliance. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed within the Determination itself, breaches of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 or related legislation could result in legal action. This might include civil penalties for incorrect claims or payments, or criminal penalties if the breach is deemed to be of a more serious nature. The exact penalties would depend on the specific breach and any applicable laws at the time of the offence.