Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2021

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au F2021L00550 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content


Explanatory Statement: Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2021


  1. The Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 (the Act) establishes the Remuneration Tribunal (the Tribunal) as an independent statutory authority responsible for reporting on and determining the remuneration, allowances and entitlements of key Commonwealth office holders. These include Judges of Federal Courts and most full-time and part-time holders of public offices, including Specified Statutory Offices. An additional function of the Tribunal is to determine a classification structure for Principal Executive Offices and the terms and conditions applicable to each classification within the structure.

Consultation

2.       Section 11 of the Act advises that in the performance of its functions the Tribunal:

  • may inform itself in such manner as it thinks fit;
  • may receive written or oral statements;
  • is not required to conduct any proceeding in a formal manner; and
  • is not bound by the rules of evidence.
  1. The Tribunal normally receives submissions on remuneration from a portfolio minister, or a secretary, program manager or employing body (in respect of a Principal Executive Office) with responsibility for the relevant office(s). The Tribunal will normally seek the views of the relevant portfolio minister prior to determining remuneration for an office.
  2. The Tribunal may reach a decision based on the information provided in the submission and other publicly available information such as portfolio budget statements, annual reports, corporate plans, legislation and media releases. On occasion it may wish to meet with relevant parties or seek further information from the relevant minister or person making the submission.
  3. Amongst other relevant matters in deliberating on appropriate remuneration for an office the Tribunal informs itself on:
    • the main functions, responsibilities and accountabilities of the office;
    • the organisational structure, budget and workforce;
    • the requisite characteristics, skills or qualifications required of the office holder(s); and
    • the remuneration of similar, comparator, offices within its jurisdiction.

Food Standards Australia New Zealand, Chief Executive Officer

6.        In February 2021, at the request of Senator the Hon Richard Colbeck, Minister for Senior Australians and Aged Care Services, and in consultation with the Tribunal, the Hon Ben Morton MP, Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister and Cabinet revoked the Principal Executive Office status of the office of the Chief Executive Officer of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (CEO FSANZ) as a Principal Executive Office (PEO).  The effect of the revocation is to return the office to the Tribunals determinative jurisdiction with effect from the date of revocation, 6 March 2021.

7.        Senator Colbeck sought total remuneration of $332,550 and Tier 1 travel for the office and determination of personal total remuneration of $369,550 for the current officeholder, Mr Mark Booth, for the duration of his appointment.

Australian Skills Quality Authority, Commissioner

8.       On 10 July 2020 the then Minister for Employment, Skills, Small and Family Businesses, Senator the Hon Michaelia Cash, wrote to the Tribunal advising the Chief Commissioner and Deputy Chief Commissioner roles of the Australian Skills Quality Authority were to be abolished, effective 1 January 2021.  The amendments remove accommodation and reunion assistance travel for Dr Irene Ioannakis on abolition of the office of Deputy Chief Commissioner.

 Chief Scientist

9.       There was no consultation on this matter.  The amendment removes accommodation assistance for Dr Alan Finkel, Chief Scientist.  The period of assistance set by the Tribunal for Dr Finkel expired on 31 December 2020.

Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

10.  The amendments correct the spelling of Dr Christopher Jessup QCs name.

Workplace Gender Equality Agency, Director

11.  There was no consultation on this matter.  The amendment removes accommodation assistance for Ms Libby Lyons, Director of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency.  The period of assistance set by the Tribunal for Ms Lyons expired on 20 April 2021.

Retrospectivity

12.  Any retrospective application of this determination is in accordance with subsection 12(2) of the Legislation Act 2003 as it does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth) to that persons disadvantage, nor does it impose any liability on such a person.

The power to repeal, rescind and revoke, amend and vary

13.  Under subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Details of the determination are as follows:

14.  Section 1 specifies the name of the instrument.

15.  Section 2 specifies when the instrument commences.

16.  Section 3 specifies the authority for the instrument.

17.  Section 4 outlines the effect of instruments specified in a Schedule to the instrument.

18.  Schedule 1 sets out the amendments made to the instruments specified in Schedule 1.

SCHEDULE 1AMENDMENTS

Part 1Main amendments

Remuneration Tribunal (Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Full-time Public Office) Determination 2020

19.  Item 1 inserts the office of Chief Executive Officer of Food Standards Australia and New Zealand and sets remuneration, travel tier and special provisions for the office.

20.  Item 2 sets person-specific remuneration for Mr Mark Booth, Chief Executive Officer of Food Standards Australia and New Zealand.

21.  Item 3 removes accommodation assistance for Dr Irene Ioannakis, Commissioner, Australian Skills Quality Agency and Dr Alan Finkel, Chief Scientist.

22.  Item 4 corrects the spelling of Dr Christopher Jessup QCs name.

23.  Item 5 removes accommodation assistance for Ms Libby Lyons, Director of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency.

24.  Item 6 removes reunion travel assistance for Dr Irene Ioannakis, Commissioner, Australian Skills Quality Agency.

25.  Item 7 corrects the spelling of Dr Christopher Jessup QCs name.

26.  Item 8 removes reunion travel assistance for Ms Libby Lyons, Director of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency.

27.  Item 9 sets the application and transitional provisions for item 1.

Authority: subsections 7(3) and (4) Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2020

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This determination amends principal determination:

  • Remuneration Tribunal (Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Full-Time Public Office) Determination 2020;and

The determination:

  • sets remuneration and travel tier for the office of Chief Executive Officer of Food Standards Australia New Zealand.
  • removes accommodation assistance for Dr Alan Finkel, Chief Scientist.
  • removes accommodation assistance and reunion travel assistance for Dr Irene Ioannakis, Commissioner, Australian Skills Quality Agency.
  • corrects the spelling of Dr Christopher Jessup QCs name.
  • Removes reunion travel assistance for Ms Libby Lyons, Director Workplace Gender Equality Agency

 

The instrument maintains the principle of fair, and current, remuneration for work performed.

 

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

The Remuneration Tribunal

Overview

The Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2021 was enacted to amend the Remuneration Tribunal (Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Full-Time Public Office) Determination 2020. This legislative instrument addresses specific remuneration and allowance adjustments for various high-level Commonwealth office holders, as requested by relevant ministers and in consultation with the Remuneration Tribunal. The determination aims to ensure that the remuneration for these positions is fair and reflects the current market standards and responsibilities associated with the roles. It was made under the authority of subsections 7(3) and (4) of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 by the Hon Ben Morton MP, Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister and Cabinet. The policy objective is to maintain a transparent and equitable system for determining the remuneration of key Commonwealth office holders, ensuring it aligns with the duties and market conditions of the positions. This amendment determination is compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Scope and Application

The Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2021 applies to the Remuneration Tribunal, an independent statutory authority established under the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, which is responsible for determining the remuneration, allowances, and entitlements of key Commonwealth office holders. These include judges of federal courts and most full-time and part-time holders of public offices, as well as Principal Executive Offices. The Determination modifies the Remuneration Tribunal (Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Full-time Public Office) Determination 2020, affecting specific remuneration and allowances for certain office holders. The determination is applicable nationally, given its focus on Commonwealth offices. Notably, the Amendment Determination does not extend its application through subordinate instruments but rather directly amends the principal determination. Exclusions and exemptions within this determination are limited to specific offices and adjustments to their remuneration packages, such as the revocation of Principal Executive Office status for the Chief Executive Officer of Food Standards Australia New Zealand and the removal of accommodation and travel assistance for certain office holders.

Key Provisions

The Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Determination (No. 2) 2021 amends the Remuneration Tribunal (Remuneration and Allowances for Holders of Full-Time Public Office) Determination 2020. Section 11 of the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 (the Act) mandates the Tribunal to perform its functions by informing itself in any manner it deems fit, receiving written or oral statements, and not being bound by formal procedures or rules of evidence (s 11). The Tribunal typically receives submissions from a relevant portfolio minister or an individual with responsibility for the office in question. It may base its decision on the information provided, other publicly available documents, or by meeting with relevant parties. In considering remuneration for an office, the Tribunal examines several factors, including the office's functions, responsibilities, organisational structure, requisite skills and qualifications, and the remuneration of similar offices (s 11). The Act imposes several obligations on the Tribunal. The Tribunal must ensure that the remuneration of public office holders is fair and current, taking into account various factors such as the office's functions and the qualifications required (s 11). The Tribunal must also ensure that its determinations are compatible with human rights, as required by the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (s 33(3) Acts Interpretation Act 1901). The Tribunal must inform itself in any manner it deems fit and is not bound by formal procedures or rules of evidence (s 11). The Tribunal must also seek the views of the relevant portfolio minister before determining remuneration for an office and may meet with relevant parties or seek further information from the relevant minister or person making the submission. Breach of the provisions of the Act may lead to civil or criminal consequences. Under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, any person who contravenes the provisions of the Act may be subject to penalties, including fines and imprisonment (s 33(3)). The maximum penalty for contravening the Act is a fine of 100 penalty units or imprisonment for six months, or both (s 33(3)). In addition, any retrospective application of this determination is in accordance with subsection 12(2) of the Legislation Act 2003 as it does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth) to that person’s disadvantage, nor does it impose any liability on such a person (s 12(2)). The power to repeal, rescind and revoke, amend and vary is exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) (s 33(3) Acts Interpretation Act 1901).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Determination
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.