EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULE NO. 61
ISSUED BY THE
AUTHORITY OF THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS
Section 93 of the Radiocommunications Act 1983 (‘the Act’) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
The Regulations amend sub-regulation 9(5) of the Radiocommunications (Licensing and General) Regulations (‘the Regulations’) to provide that an inspector when requesting a licensee to produce a licence for inspection must produce either the identity card issued to departmental inspectors under sub-section 68(1) of the Act or evidence of his or her authority as a police officer. Formerly sub-regulation 9(5) provided only that in such circumstances an inspector must produce evidence of his or her authority.
The Regulations also repeals regulation 20 of the Regulations. Regulation 20 prescribed the offices of clerk and deputy clerk of a court of summary jurisdiction that exercises criminal jurisdiction for the purposes of sub-section 71(9) of the Act. The effect of that prescription was to enable a justice of the peace who holds such an office to issue a search warrant over the telephone.
Both amendments have been requested by the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances. The Committee has requested the repeal of Regulation 20 because it considers that the power to issue a search warrant over the telephone should ideally be vested only in judges of superior courts.
Overview
The Statutory Rule 2004 No. 59, issued under the authority of the Minister for Communications, amends the Radiocommunications (Licensing and General) Regulations 1992. These amendments were made in response to recommendations from the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances, aiming to refine the regulatory framework concerning inspectors' authority and the issuance of search warrants. Specifically, the amendments require inspectors to present either an identity card issued to departmental inspectors or evidence of their authority as a police officer when requesting a licensee to produce a licence for inspection. Additionally, the amendments repeal Regulation 20, which allowed justices of the peace who hold the offices of clerk or deputy clerk of a court of summary jurisdiction to issue search warrants over the telephone. The repeal of this regulation aligns with the Committee's view that the power to issue such warrants should be limited to judges of superior courts.
The overarching objective of these amendments is to ensure that the regulatory processes are aligned with the appropriate authorities and to enhance the clarity and specificity of inspectors' authority, while also addressing the Committee's concerns regarding the appropriate vesting of powers to issue search warrants.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rule 2004 No. 61, issued under the authority of the Minister for Communications, amends the Radiocommunications (Licensing and General) Regulations by modifying sub-regulation 9(5) to specify that an inspector, when requesting a licensee to produce a licence for inspection, must now present either the identity card issued to departmental inspectors as per section 68(1) of the Radiocommunications Act 1992 or evidence of their authority as a police officer. This alteration was made in response to a recommendation by the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances, which aimed to clarify the inspector's credentials during the inspection process. Additionally, the Regulations repeal regulation 20, which previously allowed a justice of the peace holding the office of clerk or deputy clerk of a court of summary jurisdiction to issue a search warrant over the telephone. This repeal was also recommended by the Senate Standing Committee, which advocated for limiting the authority to issue such warrants to judges of superior courts. These changes are confined to the Commonwealth of Australia and are made in accordance with section 93 of the Radiocommunications Act 1992, ensuring consistency with the overarching legislative framework.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Statutory Rule concern the Radiocommunications (Licensing and General) Regulations and their amendment. Specifically, sub-regulation 9(5) has been updated to require inspectors to produce either an identity card issued to departmental inspectors under sub-section 68(1) of the Act or evidence of their authority as a police officer when requesting a licensee to produce a licence for inspection (sub-regulation 9(5)). This replaces the previous requirement that simply required the inspector to produce evidence of their authority. Furthermore, regulation 20, which previously prescribed the offices of clerk and deputy clerk of a court of summary jurisdiction that exercises criminal jurisdiction for the purposes of sub-section 71(9) of the Act, has been repealed. This repeal was in response to the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances, which suggested that the power to issue a search warrant over the telephone should ideally be vested only in judges of superior courts.
These amendments impose specific obligations and requirements on inspectors and those in the positions of clerk and deputy clerk of a court of summary jurisdiction. Inspectors must now provide the appropriate identification when requesting a licensee to produce a licence for inspection, ensuring transparency and accountability in their actions. This requirement aims to prevent misuse of authority and ensure that inspectors are duly authorised to perform their duties. The repeal of regulation 20 means that clerks and deputy clerks of a court of summary jurisdiction no longer have the authority to issue a search warrant over the telephone. This change is intended to align with the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances' recommendation that such powers should be reserved for judges of superior courts.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the Statutory Rule itself. However, any breach of the requirements set out in the amended sub-regulation 9(5) could potentially result in legal consequences under the Radiocommunications Act 1992, depending on the circumstances of the breach. Similarly, any actions taken in violation of the repealed regulation 20 could be subject to legal action, as the power to issue a search warrant over the telephone has been removed from the relevant positions. It is important to note that the maximum penalties for breaches of the Radiocommunications Act 1992 can vary depending on the specific offence and the circumstances of the case.