EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULE 1983 NO. 146 ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS
As part of its Budgetary package, the Government has decided that there should be a 23% average increase in radiocommunications licence fees with effect from 1 September 1983.
Sub-regulation 2(2) of the Radiocommunications Licence Fees Regulations provides that a reference to a class of licence of a particular kind is a reference to a class of licence of that kind within the meaning of the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations. Amendments consequential to the raising of fees and alterations in classes of licences for which fees are charged are therefore necessary in the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations and the Radiocommunications Licence Fees Regulations.
Details of the Regulations are as follows:
Regulation 1 provides that the proposed Regulations shall come into effect on 1 September 1983.
Regulation 2 provides a definition of “Principal Regulations”.
Regulation 3 provides for an increase in the fees payable for the grant or renewal of a licence available under these Regulations.
Regulation 4 provides for increases in the licence fees of fixed stations Class C according to their bandwidth range and location.
Regulation 5 repeals the schedule in the existing Regulations and substitutes a new schedule which details the classes of licences available together with the increased licence fees.
Overview
The Statutory Rule 1983 No. 146, issued under the authority of the Minister for Communications, represents a legislative response to the need for a financial adjustment in the radiocommunications sector, specifically regarding licence fees. Enacted in 1983, this statutory rule was introduced as part of the Government's budgetary measures to address the financial shortfall within the sector by implementing a 23% average increase in radiocommunications licence fees effective from 1 September 1983. The increase was aimed at ensuring the sustainability of radiocommunication services and infrastructure, thereby addressing the identified gap in funding. The policy objective was to provide a stable and predictable revenue stream to support the ongoing operations and development of the radiocommunications sector.
The rule was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and outlines the necessary amendments to the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations and the Radiocommunications Licence Fees Regulations to reflect the new fee structures. The amendments include an increase in fees for the grant or renewal of licences, adjustments to licence fees for fixed stations according to their bandwidth range and location, and the substitution of a new schedule detailing the classes of licences and their corresponding fees. These measures were designed to ensure that the radiocommunications sector could continue to function efficiently and effectively.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rule 1983 No. 146, issued under the authority of the Minister for Communications, outlines amendments necessitated by a 23% average increase in radiocommunications licence fees effective from 1 September 1983. This legislation applies to entities and persons involved in the operation of radiocommunications, particularly those requiring a licence for their activities. The increased fees affect various classes of licences, with specific attention to fixed stations classified as Class C, which are subject to fee adjustments based on their bandwidth range and location. The changes are implemented through modifications to the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations and the Radiocommunications Licence Fees Regulations, ensuring that the new fee structure is reflected in the relevant schedules. The amendments are designed to bring the regulatory framework in line with the updated budgetary measures, impacting all licence holders who must comply with the new fee rates as of the specified commencement date.
Key Provisions
The statutory rule introduced by Statutory Rule 1983 No. 146, issued under the authority of the Minister for Communications, sets forth the amendments required to implement a 23% average increase in radiocommunications licence fees, effective from 1 September 1983. Regulation 1 stipulates that these proposed regulations will come into effect on the specified date, thereby providing a clear timeline for the implementation of the fee adjustments. Regulation 2 offers a definition of "Principal Regulations," which serves as a foundational term for understanding the subsequent provisions within the document. Regulation 3 explicitly provides for the increase in fees payable for the grant or renewal of licences under these regulations, establishing the financial adjustments that will be enforced.
The obligations imposed by this statutory rule on the parties and entities governed by the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations and the Radiocommunications Licence Fees Regulations are significant. Those entities must comply with the new fee structures as outlined in the regulations. Specifically, Regulation 4 details the increases in licence fees for fixed stations of Class C, categorising these increases according to the bandwidth range and location of the stations. This classification ensures that the fee adjustments are applied fairly and consistently across different types of radiocommunications operations. Regulation 5 effectively repeals the existing fee schedule and replaces it with a new one that reflects the increased fees, thereby formalising the changes in the applicable fees.
In terms of the consequences for non-compliance, the statutory rule does not explicitly outline offences, penalties, or specific civil or criminal consequences for breaching the new fee structures. However, non-compliance with the regulations could potentially lead to enforcement actions under the broader legislative framework governing radiocommunications licences. Given the mandatory nature of these regulations, failure to adhere to the new fee structures might result in the suspension or revocation of licences, thereby impacting the ability of entities to legally operate their radiocommunications services. The precise consequences would depend on the interpretation and enforcement policies of the relevant regulatory authorities.