EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the Australian Communications and Media Authority
Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2015
Radiocommunications Act 1992
Purpose
The purpose of the Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2015 (the Determination) is to allow the trial of public mobile telecommunications service jamming devices (PMTS jamming devices) by Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW) at the Lithgow Correctional Centre to continue for a further three-year period.
The operation or supply of a PMTS jamming device, and the possession of a PMTS jamming device for the purposes of its operation or supply, are prohibited under Part 4.1 of the Radiocommunications Act 1992 (the Act). The Determination, which is made, in part, under subsection 27(2) of the Act, exempts acts or omissions relating to the use, operation, possession or supply of certain PMTS jamming devices by certain persons who perform functions or duties in relation to CSNSW from Parts 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Act, which deal respectively with offences relating to unlicensed radiocommunications, use of non-compliant equipment that uses or affects radio emissions, and offences related to radio emissions.
Legislative Provisions
Subsection 27(2) of the Act allows the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) to determine that acts or omissions by members of a class of persons to whom section 27 applies are exempt from any or all of Parts 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Act, or from specified provisions of those Parts.
Under paragraph 27(1)(be) of the Act, the ACMA may, by written determination, determine that a body that performs functions related to the investigation, prevention or prosecution of serious crime, or of corruption (whether or not the body also performs other functions), is a body to which subsection 27(1) applies.
Determinations made under paragraph 27(1)(be) and subsection 27(2) of the Act are legislative instruments for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth) (the LIA).
This Determination includes a self-ceasing provision. Subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (AIA) provides that where an Act confers a power to make a legislative instrument, the power shall be construed to include a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend or vary any such instrument.
Background
The operation or supply, or possession for the purposes of operation or supply, of a public mobile telecommunications service (PMTS) jamming device is prohibited under section 189 of the Act (see the Radiocommunications (Prohibition of PMTS Jamming Devices) Declaration 2011 (the Declaration) made under subsection 190(1) of the Act).
In 2009, CSNSW sought an exemption from the ACMA under section 27 of the Act to enable CSNSW to lawfully conduct a trial of PMTS jamming devices at the Lithgow Correctional Centre. This trial was intended to inform decision-making on whether it would be in the public interest to allow deployment of PMTS jamming devices in New South Wales correctional facilities. The use of mobile phones by inmates is considered to be a serious problem by CSNSW. While it is an offence in NSW for an inmate to use or possess a mobile phone without reasonable excuse, detection of possession and use of mobile phones can be difficult.
In September 2010, the ACMA made the Radiocommunications (Bench Testing by Corrective Services NSW of Mobile Telephone Jamming Device) Exemption Determination 2010 (the Bench Testing Determination). The Bench Testing Determination allowed CSNSW to conduct bench testing of possible jamming devices in a shielded environment, prior to the testing of a jamming device in a correctional centre. This resulted in the recommendation of a preferred jamming technology for testing in a field trial.
To enable the field trial of PMTS jamming devices at the Lithgow Correctional Centre, the ACMA made the Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2012 (the 2012 Determination) on 17 December 2012. The 2012 Determination expired on 30 September 2014.
On 20 October 2014, following a request from CSNSW for the ACMA to allow the continued operation of the jammer system, the ACMA made the Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2014 (the 2014 Determination). The 2014 Determination allowed the trial to recommence for a further 12-month period, while a report was prepared by CSNSW for the ACMA on performance indicators relating to the jammer system.
Following receipt and consideration of the report, and a request from CSNSW for the ACMA to allow the trial to continue, the ACMA agreed to make another exemption determination for a further three years. The extension of the trial is to allow thorough testing of mobile phone jamming on the 700 MHz frequency band, which had not been permitted by the 2012 or 2014 Determinations.
Operation
An exemption under subsection 27(2) may only be made in respect of a class of persons to whom section 27 applies. Section 27 applies to a person performing a function or duty in relation to a body, or kind of body, listed in subsection 27(1). CSNSW is not one of the bodies listed in subsection 27(1) of the Act. CSNSW is, however, a body that ‘performs functions related to the … prosecution of serious crime’ (paragraph 27(1)(be)) and may, therefore, fall within the scope of section 27 if the ACMA makes a determination covering CSNSW, in writing, for the purposes of that paragraph.
The Determination:
- provides, for the purposes of paragraph 27(1)(be) of the Act, that CSNSW is a body to which section 27 of the Act applies; and
- exempts, from Parts 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Act, any act or omission by certain staff or contractors of CSNSW relating to the use, operation, possession or supply of certain PMTS jamming devices provided that the act or omission occurs in the circumstances set out in the Determination.
The Determination commences on 31 October 2015 and expires on 1 November 2018.
Further details about the Determination, including the circumstances in which the exemption will apply, are set out in the Notes on Sections in Attachment A.
Consultation
From 24 August to 17 September 2015, in accordance with section 17 of the LIA, the ACMA consulted directly with three licensed mobile telecommunications carriers (the carriers), the Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (AMTA) and Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW). Given the effect of the Determination is to enable the continuation of a well-established trial, the Determination is considered machinery in nature and it was not considered necessary to undertake wider consultation. It was considered sufficient to consult only with CSNSW, the carriers and AMTA as these were judged to be the stakeholders most likely to be affected by the operation of the jammer.
Regulatory Impact
The Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) was consulted and advised that the proposed regulatory change is minor or machinery in nature and that no further regulatory impact analysis is required. The OBPR reference number is ID 17056.
Documents Incorporated in the Determination by Reference
The following documents are incorporated by reference or otherwise mentioned in this Determination:
- the Act;
- the Acts Interpretation Act 1901;
- the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW);
- the Declaration;
- the Legislative Instrument Act 2003;
- a map of the Lithgow Correctional Centre, agreed in writing by the ACMA and Corrective Services NSW;
- the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Apparatus Licence) Determination 2015; and
- the Telecommunications Act 1997.
The Commonwealth Acts and the legislative instruments referenced in the Determination can be found on the Australian Government’s ComLaw website at http://www.comlaw.gov.au. The Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) is a New South Wales Act of Parliament and can be found at http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au.
References to Acts and legislative instruments are to the Act or legislative instrument as in force from time to time in accordance with section 10 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, section 13(1) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and section 314A of the Act.
The map of the Lithgow Correctional Centre sets the field trial zone and is available from the ACMA upon request.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A statement of compatibility with human rights for the purpose of Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 is set out in Attachment B.
ATTACHMENT A
NOTES ON SECTIONS
Section 1 Name of instrument
Section 1 provides for the citation of the Determination as the Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2015.
Section 2 Commencement
The Determination will commence on 31 October 2015.
Section 3 Definitions
Section 3 defines important terms used in the Determination including ‘designated frequencies’, ‘field trial participant’, ‘field trial zone’ and ‘nominated PMTS jamming device’.
Designated frequencies means any of the frequency bands used for the supply of a public mobile telecommunications service. Field trial participant is defined in subsection 6(2) of the Determination to include CSNSW staff members and any field trial contractors and their employees.
Field trial zone defines the area of the field trial within the Lithgow Correctional Centre and as depicted on a map agreed in writing by the ACMA and CSNSW.
Nominated PMTS jamming device defines the PMTS jamming device that will be used in the field trial as that which has been agreed in writing between CSNSW and the ACMA.
Section 4 Corrective Services NSW is a body for the purpose of paragraph 27(1)(be) of the Act
By virtue of section 4, CSNSW is a body covered by a written determination made by the ACMA for the purposes of paragraph 27(1)(be) of the Act. This enables the ACMA to make an exemption under subsection 27(2) in relation to persons performing functions or duties in relation to CSNSW, including the staff and contractors described in subsection 6(2) of the Determination.
Section 5 Determination expires
The Determination will expire on 1 November 2018, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.
Section 6 Exemption in relation to the field trial
Subsection 6(1) provides that any act or omission by a field trial participant in relation to the use, operation, supply or possession of a nominated PMTS jamming device is exempt from Parts 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Act in the circumstances specified in subsection 6(3).
Subsection 6(2) defines a field trial participant for the purposes of subsection 6(1) as a person performing a function or duty in relation to CSNSW and who is either a CSNSW staff member, a person who has a contract with CSNSW in relation to the field trial, or a person who is employed or engaged by a person who has a contract with CSNSW in relation to the conduct of the field trial.
Subsection 6(3) specifies all the circumstances that must exist for acts or omissions of field trial participants relating to the use, operation, possession or supply of a PMTS jamming device to be exempt from Parts 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Act.
One of the circumstances that must exist is that the ACMA has not notified CSNSW in writing that all field trial participants are excluded from relying on the Determination, or if the ACMA has so notified CSNSW, that the period specified or any extension has expired or the notice has been withdrawn (see paragraph 6(3)(a)). The ACMA may decide to notify CSNSW that field trial participants are excluded from relying on the Determination for a variety of reasons, including where the ACMA has concerns about safety or potential interference issues or is unable to obtain or verify sufficient details about the operation of the PMTS jamming devices to alleviate these concerns. Examples of the kinds of situations that might raise such concerns include:
- a failure to observe arrangements established in the carrier liaison agreement;
- threats to public safety resulting from the operation of the PMTS jamming devices;
- monitoring and reporting arrangements regarding the impact of the field trial on the operation of mobile telecommunications networks are deficient;
- harmful emissions occur outside the field trial zone;
- public complaints are received about the operation of the field trial that require further investigation before the trial can continue;
- requests from the ACMA for information and data relating to the trial are not met; or
- requests from the ACMA for particular testing to be conducted on the operation of the jammer or emission levels are not met.
Paragraph 6(3)(b) specifies that any act or omission must be done for the purposes of the field trial. Paragraph 6(3)(c) specifies that a carrier liaison agreement must be in place with each of the relevant carriers. Paragraph 6(3)(d) specifies safeguard requirements for the prevention of harmful interference during the field trial. Paragraph 6(3)(d) specifies that the act or omission must occur for the purpose of causing harmful interference to radiocommunications on designated frequencies within the field trial zone; must cause harmful interference only to radiocommunications on base transmit frequencies; must not cause radio emissions above -128.5 dBm/kHz on non-designated frequencies outside the field trial zone; and must occur in accordance with Parts 3 of the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Apparatus Licence) Determination 2015 as if the PMTS jamming device is a transmitter operated under a licence to which that Part applies . Paragraph 6(3)(e) specifies that, if the PMTS jamming device is a transmitter mentioned in section 10 of the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Apparatus Licence) Determination 2015, records of the use and operation of the PMTS jamming device must be kept in accordance with the record-keeping requirements at Part 4 of the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Apparatus Licence) Determination 2015 as if the PMTS jamming device is a transmitter operated under a licence to which that Part applies.
ATTACHMENT B
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2015
This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
The ACMA has made the Radiocommunications (Field Trial by Corrective Services NSW of PMTS Jamming Devices at Lithgow Correctional Centre) Exemption Determination 2015 to enable the continuation of the trial of public mobile telecommunications service jamming devices by Corrective Services NSW at the Lithgow Correctional Centre for a further three years.
Human Rights Implications
This Legislative Instrument engages an applicable right or freedom, namely the right to freedom of opinion and expression. The use of these jamming devices is intended to prevent inmates at the Lithgow Correctional Centre from being able to use mobile telecommunications and therefore impacts upon their freedom of expression. However, the legislative instrument is not incompatible with the right engaged as the limitation is reasonable, necessary and proportionate to the achievement of the legitimate objective of preventing inmates from using mobile phones in an unsupervised manner in a correctional facility.
It is an offence under subsection 27DA(1) of the Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) for an inmate to use or possess a mobile phone without reasonable excuse as the use of mobile phones may allow inmates to continue to be involved in criminal activity outside the confines of the correctional facility. This is a threat to the proper administration of correctional facilities and is contrary to the objectives of imprisonment. It can be difficult to detect the use and possession of mobile phones in correctional facilities. It is considered that a trial of mobile phone jamming devices to prevent inmates using mobile phones while in correctional facilities assists in ensuring that inmates are not able to contravene the law.
Conclusion
This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights because to the extent that it may limit human rights those limitations are reasonable, necessary and proportionate.
Australian Communications and Media Authority