STATUTORY RULES.
1932. No. 85.
REGULATION UNDER THE QUARANTINE ACT 1908-1924.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Quarantine Act 1908-1924, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-fourth day of August, 1932.
ISAAC A. ISAACS
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
C. W. C. MARR
Minister for Health.
Amendment of Quarantine Regulations 1927.
The Quarantine Regulations 1927 (Statutory Rules 1927, No. 8) as amended by Statutory Rule 1930 No. 136 are amended—
By omitting regulation 146a and substituting therefor the following regulation:—
146a. A fee of 2s. per bale shall be paid by the importer for the disinfection of raw cotton.
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
2686.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1932, No. 85, made under the Quarantine Act 1908-1924, was enacted to address specific issues arising from the importation of goods, particularly raw cotton, which needed disinfection to prevent the spread of pests and diseases. This legislative instrument, made by the Governor-General in Council, was designed to ensure that the import of such goods complied with updated health and safety standards. The regulation introduces a fee for the disinfection of raw cotton, replacing a previous regulation, thereby aligning the costs with the necessary health measures and ensuring the protection of the local agricultural industry. This change reflects the policy objective of maintaining stringent quarantine controls while adapting to evolving trade practices.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1932 No. 85 amends the Quarantine Regulations 1927, implementing a change in the fees associated with the importation and disinfection of raw cotton into Australia. This regulation applies to importers who handle raw cotton, imposing a fee of 2 shillings per bale for the disinfection process. The regulation is made under the Quarantine Act 1908-1924 and thus applies to the entire Commonwealth of Australia. It is specifically tailored to the conduct and transactions involving the importation of raw cotton, ensuring that all such activities comply with the prescribed disinfection requirements. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the regulation itself, although broader exemptions or exclusions may be found in the overarching Quarantine Act or other related legislative instruments. The application and scope of this regulation can be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments or subsequent amendments to the Quarantine Regulations.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Regulation under the Quarantine Act 1908-1924 (C1932L00085) amend the Quarantine Regulations 1927 by substituting a new regulation 146a. This new regulation mandates that a fee of 2 shillings per bale must be paid by the importer for the disinfection of raw cotton. This is a clear and specific instruction that requires importers to cover the cost of disinfecting raw cotton to ensure it meets the necessary quarantine standards (reg. 146a).
These provisions impose specific financial obligations on the parties involved. Importers of raw cotton are now required to pay a fee of 2 shillings per bale for the disinfection of their goods. This fee is intended to cover the costs associated with ensuring that the raw cotton does not pose any biosecurity risks, such as the presence of pests or diseases that could affect Australian agriculture or ecosystems (reg. 146a).
There are no explicit provisions detailing offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance in the provided excerpt. However, given the context of the Quarantine Act and the nature of the regulation, non-compliance could potentially lead to legal consequences under the broader legislative framework. This might include fines, the detention of goods, or other enforcement actions to ensure compliance with the Quarantine Act and its associated regulations. The penalties for such breaches would likely be determined in accordance with the overarching provisions of the Quarantine Act 1908-1924 and other relevant legislation.