Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4)

Administered by Department of Agriculture

Legislation au F2008L04345 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

 

 

Quarantine Act 1908

 

Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4)

 

The Quarantine Proclamation 1998 (‘the Quarantine Proclamation’) provides the legislative basis for controlling the entry of animals, plants and other goods of quarantine concern into Australia, and for controlling the movement of animals, plants or other goods of quarantine interest between different parts of the Australian mainland.

 

Section 13 of the Quarantine Act 1908 (‘the Act’) provides, in part, that the

Governor-General may, by proclamation, appoint places on land or sea to be quarantine stations for the performance of quarantine by vessels, persons, goods, animals, or plants.

 

Subsection 14(1) of the Quarantine Proclamation sets out those places, which have been proclaimed to be quarantine stations for the performance of quarantine by animals and goods. Schedule 1, Part 1 to the Quarantine Proclamation provides details regarding the location of these quarantine stations.

 

The purpose of the amending Proclamation is to amend the Quarantine Proclamation to remove the Taronga Zoo, the Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, the Adelaide Zoo and the Perth Zoological Gardens from the list of proclaimed quarantine stations. Arrangements will be put in place to recognise these zoos as ‘Quarantine Approved Places’ (QAPs) under section 46A of the Act.

 

The Taronga Zoo, the Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, the Adelaide Zoo and the Perth Zoological Gardens are listed as quarantine stations, however there are no relevant guidelines for quarantine stations set out in the Quarantine Regulations 2000. It is proposed that it will be more appropriate for these zoos to become QAPs under section 46A of the Act. This would ensure that all zoos importing animals are managed and operated under one system as QAPs for post-arrival quarantine.

 

Consultation has occurred with each of the zoos involved and they are supportive of the move to one system and with the delayed commencement date.

 

The amending Proclamation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The amending Proclamation commences on 1 January 2009. This allows each of the four zoos adequate time to apply, meet required conditions of approval and become approved and operate as QAPs under section 46A of the Act before they cease to be quarantine stations.

 

Section 46A of the Act provides a comprehensive legislative framework for the use of commercial and other premises for quarantine activities. The statutory scheme established under section 46A of the Act allows for the Director of Quarantine to approve a place as a QAP if satisfied about a range of matters, including whether the arrangements for the management and control of the place are adequate, having regard to the nature of the animals and the level of quarantine risk.

 

Details of the amending Proclamation are set out below:

 

Section 1 provides the name of the amending Proclamation is the Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4).

 

Section 2 provides that the amending Proclamation commences on 1 January 2009. This delayed commencement is to give the zoos sufficient time to comply with the requirements to become a Quarantine Approved Places (QAPs) under section 46A of the Act before they cease to quarantine stations.

 

Section 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Quarantine Proclamation 1998 (‘the Quarantine Proclamation’)

 

Schedule 1 Amendments

 

Items [1] and [3] omit paragraphs (c), (d), (h) and (j) from subsection 14(1) of the Act. This removes references to the Taronga Zoo, the Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, the Adelaide Zoo and Perth Zoological Gardens. The effect of these amendments is to move to the operation of one system for the post-arrival quarantine of imported animals for all zoos.

 

Historically, parameters for regulation of zoos were detailed in Part V of the Quarantine (Animals) Regulations. Part V was not retained when these Regulations were remade in 2000 by the Quarantine Regulations 2000 (‘2000 Regulations). As a result the Taronga Zoo, the Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, the Adelaide Zoo and the Perth Zoological Gardens are listed as quarantine stations, however there are now no relevant guidelines for quarantine stations set out in the 2000 Regulations.

 

Instead of being proclaimed quarantine stations, it is more appropriate for these four zoos to apply and upon approval become QAPs under section 46A of the Act. Section 46A provides a comprehensive legislative framework for the use of commercial and other premises for quarantine activities. It sets out the parameters within which premises may be approved, the period of approval and the criteria for suspending or revoking approvals. Section 46A was inserted to help address the recommendations of the Nairn Report, entitled Australian Quarantine: a shared responsibility (1996). This report recognised and endorsed an increasing role for industry in the performance of some quarantine activities.

 

Currently, other zoos in Australia that import animals do so by becoming registered as QAPs under section 46A of the Act. This amendment ensures that all zoos importing animals are managed and operate under one system as QAPs for post-arrival quarantine.

 

Item [2] makes a minor grammatical change required due to the omission of paragraph 14(1) (j) (see item [3]).

 

Items [4 to 7] amends Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Proclamation by omitting clauses 3, 4, 8 and 10 which detail the location of the quarantine stations that will be removed by items [1] and [3].

Overview

The Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4) was enacted to address the need for a unified system in managing the post-arrival quarantine of imported animals in Australia. This legislative instrument amends the Quarantine Proclamation 1998, removing the Taronga Zoo, Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, Adelaide Zoo, and Perth Zoological Gardens from the list of proclaimed quarantine stations, thereby transitioning them into "Quarantine Approved Places" (QAPs) under section 46A of the Quarantine Act 1908. The primary objective of this amendment is to streamline the regulatory framework and ensure that all zoos involved in the import of animals operate under the same system. This change was recommended by the Nairn Report, which emphasised an increasing role for industry in the performance of quarantine activities. The delayed commencement of the Proclamation on 1 January 2009 provides the zoos involved with sufficient time to meet the conditions required to become QAPs, thus maintaining continuity in their operations while transitioning to the new regulatory framework.

Scope and Application

The Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4) amends the Quarantine Proclamation 1998 to facilitate the transition of four major Australian zoos—Taronga Zoo, Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, Adelaide Zoo, and Perth Zoological Gardens—from being designated quarantine stations to becoming Quarantine Approved Places (QAPs) under the Quarantine Act 1908. This amendment applies to the zoos themselves, which are involved in the importation of animals, and ensures they operate under a consistent regulatory framework. The amendment removes these zoos from the list of proclaimed quarantine stations, thereby aligning their regulatory status with other zoos that import animals and are already operating as QAPs under section 46A of the Act. The change is intended to standardise the management and operation of all zoos engaged in animal imports, ensuring they meet the criteria for approval as QAPs, which include adequate management and control arrangements. This shift is supported by the zoos involved, who have been consulted and have agreed to the transition, which will take effect from 1 January 2009 to allow sufficient time for compliance with the new requirements. The amendment does not alter the jurisdictional reach of the Quarantine Proclamation, which remains applicable across Australia, and no exclusions or exemptions are introduced by this specific proclamation. The changes are made through the amending proclamation itself, with no further extension or restriction of application through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The Quarantine Amendment Proclamation 2008 (No. 4) brings several key changes to the existing legislative framework concerning quarantine stations for animals and goods in Australia. Section 2 of the Proclamation (s. 2) specifies that it will commence on 1 January 2009, providing a transitional period for the zoos involved to adjust to the new regulatory requirements. Section 3 (s. 3) amends the Quarantine Proclamation 1998, removing the Taronga Zoo, the Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens, the Adelaide Zoo, and the Perth Zoological Gardens from the list of proclaimed quarantine stations. This change is detailed in Schedule 1 of the Proclamation (Schedule 1, Item [1], [3]), which removes specific references to these zoos from subsection 14(1) of the Quarantine Proclamation. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include ensuring that any premises used for quarantine activities comply with the requirements set out in section 46A. This section (s. 46A) provides a comprehensive legislative framework for approving places as Quarantine Approved Places (QAPs). Zoos that wish to import animals must apply for and obtain approval as a QAP, meeting the criteria for management and control of the premises, among other requirements. The Director of Quarantine has the authority to approve a place as a QAP if satisfied that the arrangements for managing and controlling the place are adequate, considering the nature of the animals and the level of quarantine risk (s. 46A). Breaching the obligations set out in the Act can lead to various consequences, both civil and criminal. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is clear that failure to comply with the requirements for becoming a QAP or operating under the approved system could result in legal action. The potential consequences may include fines, revocation of approval, and other regulatory penalties. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as the specific provisions of the Quarantine Act 1908 and associated regulations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Proclamation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Transitional Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.