EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1983 NO 98
PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
Issued with the authority of the Public Service Board
Sub-section 97(1) of the Public Service Act 1922 provides that the Public Service Board may, with the approval of the Governor-General, make regulations prescribing all matters which are required or permitted to be prescribed or which are necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
Sub-section 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provides (inter alia) that, where an Act confers a power to make regulations, the power shall, unless the contrary intention appears, be construed as including a power to amend those regulations.
The statutory rules amend regulation 100B which prescribes the conditions for approval as a student for the purposes of the fees reimbursement scheme. Sub-regulation 100B(3) currently places a restriction on these approvals that is at variance with studies assistance policy. The regulation allows Chief Officers to approve studies assistance only when the proposed course of study ‘will enhance both the capacity of the Department to carry out its functions and the efficient and economical use of staff resources in the Service as a whole.’ It is proposed that the regulation allow approval when either of these conditions is satisfied.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1983 No. 98, enacted under the Public Service Regulations (Amendment), was introduced to address inconsistencies between the existing regulations and the studies assistance policy within the Australian Public Service. This amendment was necessitated by the need to align regulation 100B with the overarching policy objectives, particularly concerning the approval process for students seeking fees reimbursement. The Public Service Board, with the approval of the Governor-General, was authorised under sub-section 97(1) of the Public Service Act 1922 to make these regulatory changes. The policy objective is to ensure that the regulation of studies assistance within the public service is consistent with the broader policy framework, thereby facilitating a more streamlined and effective implementation of the fees reimbursement scheme. This amendment represents a move towards greater coherence and practicality in the administration of staff development initiatives within the public sector.
Scope and Application
The Public Service Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1983 No. 98 amends the Public Service Regulations under the authority granted by the Public Service Act 1922. This legislation applies to the public service sector in Australia, affecting both individuals and entities involved in the public service. The amendment specifically targets regulation 100B, which pertains to the conditions for approval as a student under the fees reimbursement scheme. The changes proposed in the amendment are intended to align the regulation with the current studies assistance policy, by allowing Chief Officers to approve studies assistance when either the capacity of the Department to carry out its functions or the efficient and economical use of staff resources in the Service as a whole is enhanced. This amendment broadens the scope of approval criteria, providing more flexibility in the public service’s approach to studies assistance.
The amendment does not specify any geographic or jurisdictional limitations, thus applying nationally across all Commonwealth public service entities. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the text of the explanatory statement. The scope of application might be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments made under the authority of the Public Service Board, subject to the approval of the Governor-General.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of these statutory rules concern the amendment of regulation 100B, which outlines the conditions for approval as a student under the fees reimbursement scheme (subsection 100B(3)). Currently, this regulation restricts the approval of studies assistance to instances where the proposed course of study will both enhance the capacity of the Department to carry out its functions and promote the efficient and economical use of staff resources in the Service as a whole. The proposed amendment seeks to relax this restriction by allowing approval when either of these conditions is met.
The amendment imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties or entities it governs. Chief Officers, who are responsible for approving studies assistance, are now empowered to grant approval if the proposed course of study meets at least one of the specified conditions, rather than both. This change broadens the scope of permissible approvals, potentially increasing the number of students who can receive fees reimbursement under the scheme. The amendment aims to align the regulation more closely with current studies assistance policy, ensuring that the process for approving studies assistance is both flexible and supportive of the Department's and the Service's objectives.
In terms of consequences for breach, the statutory rules do not explicitly outline any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for non-compliance. However, it is implied that failure to adhere to the amended regulation could result in the denial of fees reimbursement to eligible students. Such a denial could have financial implications for both the students and the Department, as well as potential reputational damage if it is perceived that the amendment was not properly implemented or that approvals were granted without due consideration. Although specific penalties are not stated, adherence to the regulation remains crucial to ensure the smooth operation of the fees reimbursement scheme.
The changes introduced by these statutory rules reflect an intention to make the process for approving studies assistance more flexible and aligned with current policy. By allowing Chief Officers to approve studies assistance when either of the specified conditions is satisfied, the amendment aims to facilitate a broader range of educational opportunities for public service employees. This, in turn, could enhance the skills and capabilities of the workforce, ultimately benefiting the Department and the Service as a whole. While the rules do not specify penalties for non-compliance, the importance of adhering to the amended regulation is underscored by the potential consequences for both students and the Department.