COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Public Lending Right Act 1985
Public Lending Right Scheme 1997 (Modification No. 1 of 2003)
I, CHARLES RODERICK KEMP, Minister for the Arts and Sport, issue the following Notice under paragraph 5(1)(b) of the Public Lending Right Act 1985 (the Act).
Dated 7 April 2003
ROD KEMP
Minister for the Arts and Sport
_______________________________
1. Modification
1.1 The Public Lending Right Scheme 1997 is modified as set out in this Notice.
2. Subsection 14(2)
2.1 Omit “$1.30”, substitute “$1.34”.
3. Subsection 15(2)
3.1 Omit “32.5 cents”, substitute “33.5 cents”.
_______________________________
Overview
The Public Lending Right Act 1985 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for a fair compensation system for authors whose works are borrowed from libraries. The Act establishes the Public Lending Right (PLR) scheme, which provides payments to authors and translators for the use of their works in public libraries. The policy objective of the Act is to ensure that authors and creators receive appropriate compensation for the use of their works in libraries, thereby recognising their contribution and encouraging the creation and dissemination of literature.
The Public Lending Right Scheme 1997 (Modification No. 1 of 2003) was issued by Charles Roderick Kemp, the Minister for the Arts and Sport, under the authority of the Public Lending Right Act 1985. This modification adjusts the rates of payment under the scheme, reflecting changes in the economic environment and ensuring that authors continue to receive fair compensation for the use of their works in libraries. The modification increases the rate of payment to authors from $1.30 to $1.34 per loan and from 32.5 cents to 33.5 cents per loan for translators, ensuring that the scheme remains viable and effective in compensating authors and creators.
Scope and Application
The Public Lending Right Act 1985 applies to authors of eligible published works in Australia, entitling them to receive compensation for the use of their works in public libraries and similar institutions. This legislation operates at the Commonwealth level, affecting authors across Australia regardless of state or territory lines. The scope includes published literary works such as books, which are lent or made available in public libraries, educational institutions, and certain other authorised bodies. The Act's application extends to both individual authors and entities representing authors, but it does not include unpublished works, audio-visual materials, or digital content not in a traditional book format. The compensation rates are periodically reviewed and adjusted as per the legislative instrument, which in this instance, is the Public Lending Right Scheme 1997 (Modification No. 1 of 2003). This modification, issued by the Minister for the Arts and Sport, specifically adjusts the compensation rate for authors from $1.30 to $1.34 per loan and from 32.5 cents to 33.5 cents per loan for secondary school students.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Public Lending Right Scheme 1997 (Modification No. 1 of 2003) are primarily focused on modifying the monetary amounts specified in the original legislation. Section 1 indicates the overall modification of the Scheme, while subsection 14(2) increases the specified amount from $1.30 to $1.34. Similarly, subsection 15(2) modifies the rate from 32.5 cents to 33.5 cents. These changes are intended to reflect adjustments in the remuneration paid under the Public Lending Right (PLR) scheme.
The modifications imposed by this legislative instrument place specific obligations on the parties involved, particularly on the entities responsible for administering the PLR payments. The amendment requires these entities to adjust their calculations and payments in line with the new rates specified in the modified sections. This includes updating their systems and processes to ensure that authors and publishers are compensated correctly under the revised rates.
The Act does not explicitly state any new offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of the modified provisions. However, failure to comply with the updated payment rates could potentially lead to disputes between the administrators and the rights holders. While there are no maximum penalties specified in the text, any non-compliance issues would likely be addressed through existing legal frameworks governing contractual obligations and administrative processes. This might involve litigation or arbitration to resolve any discrepancies in payments.