Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations 1993 No. 328
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Statutory Rules 1993 No. 328
Issued by the authority of the Minister for Justice
Proceeds of Crime Act 1987
Commonwealth Banks Act 1959
Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations
Section 104 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act. Section 129 of the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959 gives the Governor-General the power to make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing matters required or permitted to be prescribed, or which are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act or for the conduct of business by the Development Bank.
The Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations allows restitution to the Commonwealth Bank of money of which it was defrauded, before its restructuring in April 1991. The money was recovered pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and paid into the Confiscated Assets Trust Fund in August 1992.
Regulation 2(1) declares for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and for the purposes of section 27H of the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959 the Commonwealth Bank to be incorporated for a purpose of the Commonwealth in relation to a relevant offence within the meaning of 34C of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 which was committed before 17 April 1991.
Regulation 2(2) prescribes the Commonwealth Bank of Australia as a 'GBE' (Government Business Enterprise) for the purposes of the definition of that term in subsection 4(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987.
The proposed regulations will commence on gazettal.
Overview
The Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations 1993 were introduced to address the need for restitution to the Commonwealth Bank, which had been defrauded of funds prior to its restructuring on 17 April 1991. These regulations were enacted under the authority of the Governor-General, as authorised by section 104 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and section 129 of the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959. The overarching policy objective is to ensure that the Commonwealth Bank receives compensation for losses incurred from criminal activities, facilitating the recovery of funds which had been confiscated and subsequently deposited into the Confiscated Assets Trust Fund in August 1992. The regulations specify the Commonwealth Bank as a Government Business Enterprise, thereby enabling it to benefit from the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987, and were designed to be effective from the moment they were gazetted.
Scope and Application
The Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations 1993 applies to the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in its capacity as a Government Business Enterprise (GBE) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959. This legislation specifically pertains to money that was defrauded from the Commonwealth Bank prior to its restructuring in April 1991, and which was subsequently recovered and deposited into the Confiscated Assets Trust Fund in August 1992. The regulations allow for restitution to be made to the Commonwealth Bank of Australia for these recovered funds. Regulation 2(1) of the Act designates the Commonwealth Bank as incorporated for a purpose of the Commonwealth, concerning relevant offences committed before 17 April 1991, while Regulation 2(2) classifies the Commonwealth Bank as a GBE for the purposes of the definition provided in subsection 4(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987. These regulations, which are made under the authority granted by Sections 104 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and Section 129 of the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959, provide the necessary framework for the restitution of the recovered funds. The regulations will take effect upon their gazettal.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Proceeds of Crime (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) Regulations 1993 (No. 328) are Regulation 2(1) and 2(2). Regulation 2(1) establishes the Commonwealth Bank as incorporated for a purpose of the Commonwealth in relation to certain offences under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 that were committed prior to 17 April 1991. Regulation 2(2) designates the Commonwealth Bank of Australia as a Government Business Enterprise (GBE) for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987. These provisions are critical in establishing the framework within which the Commonwealth Bank can seek restitution for money defrauded from it before its restructuring in April 1991. The money in question was recovered under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and paid into the Confiscated Assets Trust Fund in August 1992.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these regulations primarily focus on the procedural and eligibility criteria for the Commonwealth Bank to seek restitution. Regulation 2(1) mandates that any claim for restitution must pertain to offences committed before 17 April 1991. Regulation 2(2) ensures that the Commonwealth Bank qualifies as a GBE under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987, thereby enabling it to access the restitution process. The regulations are designed to ensure that the restitution process is both fair and within the legal framework established by the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 and the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches, the regulations themselves do not explicitly outline penalties. However, any failure to comply with the requirements set out in the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 or the Commonwealth Banks Act 1959 could result in legal repercussions under those Acts. For instance, if the Commonwealth Bank does not adhere to the stipulated conditions for restitution, it may face legal challenges or be denied the restitution it seeks. The Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 includes provisions for penalties and enforcement, which could be invoked if there are any breaches related to the misuse of confiscated assets or non-compliance with the Act's provisions. While the specific maximum penalties are detailed within the main Act, the regulations focus on setting the eligibility criteria and procedural steps for restitution.