EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Health and Ageing
Private Health Insurance Act 2007
Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3)
Authority
Section 333-20 of the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 (the Act) provides that the Minister may make the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules providing for matters required or permitted by Part 3-3 of the Act or necessary or convenient in order to carry out or give effect to that part of the Act.
Purpose
The Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3) (the Amendment Rules) amend the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2) (the Prostheses Rules), which commenced on 22 August 2011. The Amendment Rules make a consequential amendment to the definition of an accredited podiatrist to align it with the required standard of treatment provided by a podiatric surgeon as described in the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2011 (the Accreditation Rules).
Background
The Accreditation Rules were made to replace the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2008 to align the standard of treatment provided by podiatric surgeons for the payment of private health insurance benefits, with the national standard for practice in the specialty of podiatric surgery under the National Law. The Accreditation Rules define the National Law to mean the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld), as it applies to the States and Territories other than Western Australia, and to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (WA) Act 2010.
Rule 8 of the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2008 previously required podiatric surgeons to be accredited under section 3AAA of the Health Insurance Act 1973, to allow the payment of private health insurance benefits for their services. Rule 8 of the Accreditation Rules now require podiatric surgeons to hold specialist registration in the specialty of podiatric surgery under the National Law.
To reflect rule 8 of the Accreditation Rules, a consequential amendment is required to change the definition of an accredited podiatrist in the Prostheses Rules.
Details
The Amendment Rules change the definition of an accredited podiatrist in rule 4 of the Prostheses Rules to align it with the required standard of treatment provided by a podiatric surgeon under the Accreditation Rules.
Details of the Amendment Rules are set out in the Attachment.
Consultation
In accordance with section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, consultation was unnecessary for this instrument as it is of a minor nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements. The Department of Health and Ageing conducted appropriate consultation with the Podiatry Board of Australia and the Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons before the Accreditation Rules were made.
The Amendment Rules are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
The Amendment Rules commence on the day after registration.
Authority: Section 333-20 of the Private Health Insurance Act 2007
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AGEING
OCTOBER 2011
ATTACHMENT
DETAILS OF THE PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE (PROSTHESES) AMENDMENT RULES 2011 (No.3)
1. Name of Rules
Rule 1 provides that the title of the Rules is the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3) (the Amendment Rules).
2. Commencement
Rule 2 provides that the Amendment Rules are to commence on the day after registration.
3. Amendment of the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2)
Rule 3 provides that the Schedule to the Amendment Rules amends the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2) (the Rules), which commenced on 22 August 2011.
Schedule – Amendments
Item 1 – Part 1 Preliminary, Rule 4 Definitions
The Amendment Rules change the definition of an accredited podiatrist in rule 4 of the Rules to mean a podiatric surgeon who holds specialist registration in the specialty of podiatric surgery under the National Law. A definition for the term National Law has also been inserted in rule 4 which is consistent with the Accreditation Rules.
This change enables private health insurers to pay benefits for the provision of a listed prosthesis which is associated with podiatric treatment provided by a podiatric surgeon who holds specialist registration in the specialty of podiatric surgery under the National Law.
Overview
The Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3), made under section 333-20 of the Private Health Insurance Act 2007, address a specific gap in the definition of an accredited podiatrist in the context of private health insurance benefits for prostheses. These Amendment Rules were enacted to align the definition of an accredited podiatrist in the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2) with the updated standards for specialist registration in podiatric surgery, as outlined in the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2011. The objective of these amendments is to ensure consistency in the standards of treatment and accreditation for podiatric surgeons, thereby facilitating appropriate payment of benefits by private health insurers for prostheses associated with podiatric treatment. The rules were developed following consultation with relevant boards and colleges, and they commenced on the day after their registration.
Scope and Application
The Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3) are a legislative instrument designed to amend the Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2), which came into effect on 22 August 2011. These Amendment Rules are made under section 333-20 of the Private Health Insurance Act 2007, allowing the Minister for Health and Ageing to address matters required or permitted by Part 3-3 of the Act. They are intended to align the definition of an accredited podiatrist with the required standard of treatment provided by a podiatric surgeon, as stipulated in the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2011. This alignment is necessary to ensure that the payment of private health insurance benefits for prostheses associated with podiatric treatment is consistent with the national standard for the practice of podiatric surgery under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. The Amendment Rules do not substantially alter existing arrangements and were deemed not to require further consultation as per section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Amendment Rules 2011 (No.3) primarily amend the existing Private Health Insurance (Prostheses) Rules 2011 (No.2) (Prostheses Rules) (Rule 3). These amendments were necessitated by changes in the Private Health Insurance (Accreditation) Rules 2011 (Accreditation Rules) which updated the standard of treatment provided by podiatric surgeons. Specifically, Rule 4 of the Prostheses Rules is altered to redefine "accredited podiatrist" to mean a podiatric surgeon who holds specialist registration in the specialty of podiatric surgery under the National Law (Item 1, Schedule). This amendment ensures that the definition of an accredited podiatrist aligns with the new standards set out in the Accreditation Rules.
Under these Amendment Rules, private health insurers are required to pay benefits for the provision of a listed prosthesis if the treatment is associated with a podiatric surgeon who holds the requisite specialist registration under the National Law. This obligation is crucial for ensuring that the benefits provided by private health insurers are consistent with the updated standards of podiatric surgery as defined by the Accreditation Rules. Furthermore, podiatric surgeons seeking to provide treatments that qualify for private health insurance benefits must ensure they meet the specialist registration requirements outlined in the National Law.
Breach of these provisions can lead to significant consequences. Although the Explanatory Statement does not detail specific penalties for non-compliance, it is implied that failure to adhere to the updated standards and definitions could result in financial penalties for private health insurers who do not comply with the new requirements. Additionally, podiatric surgeons who do not meet the specialist registration criteria may be ineligible to receive benefits payments from private health insurers, impacting their ability to provide certain treatments to insured patients.
In summary, the Amendment Rules serve to update the Prostheses Rules to align with the new standards for podiatric surgery as defined by the Accreditation Rules. These changes impose obligations on private health insurers to pay benefits according to the updated definitions and on podiatric surgeons to meet the specialist registration criteria. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to financial penalties for insurers and ineligibility for surgeons to receive benefits payments.