EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 2004 No. 382
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Foreign Affairs
Subject: International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963
Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1)
Section 13 of the International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
The purpose of the Regulations is to extend arrangements for the repayment of indirect tax to the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (the PrepCom) so that purchases made between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002 are covered also.
The PrepCom was established in 1996 to prepare for the operation of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, and of its verification regime, when the Treaty enters into force. A particular task of the PrepCom is to manage the establishment and provisional operation of the International Monitoring System which will comprise 337 facilities worldwide for seismic, radionuclide, infrasound and Hydroacoustic monitoring. At 2 December 2004, the CTBT has been signed by 174 States and ratified by 120. Of the 44 States listed in Annex 2 to the Treaty, 33 have ratified. Australia’s instrument of ratification was deposited on 9 July 1998.
To facilitate the hosting of 21 IMS facilities in Australia, Australia and the PrepCom signed a bilateral arrangement in March 2000. This came into effect on 17 August 2000. The provisions of the arrangement require inter-alia that Australia will make arrangements for repayment of indirect tax on significant purchases for official use. The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2002 were made to address this obligation, but commenced only on 28 March 2002. The Regulations make it possible to deal with claims made by the PrepCom for refund of indirect tax on activities between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002.
Details of the proposed Regulations are attached.
The Act specifies no conditions that need to be met before the power to make the Regulations may be exercised.
The Regulations commence on the date of their notification in the Gazette.
The Regulations might be regarded as retrospective in effect. The Attorney General’s Department is satisfied however that they are consistent with section 48 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 in that they do not disadvantage any person other that the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth agency.
Authority: Section 13 of the International Organisations
(Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963
Attachment
Details of the proposed Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1)
Regulation 1 cites the Regulations as the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1).
Regulation 2 provides that the Regulations commence on gazettal.
Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 2000.
Item 1 of Schedule 1 amends subregulation 15(1) by omitting “acquisitions by PrepCom” and substituting “acquisitions by PrepCom made on or after 17 August 2000”. This makes it possible to deal with claims for the refund of Goods and Service Tax paid by the PrepCom on acquisitions made between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002.
Overview
The International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the privileges and immunities of international organisations operating within Australia. The Act was introduced to address the need for legal clarity and protection in the operation of international bodies on Australian soil, ensuring that these entities can function without undue interference from the host country’s legal system. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations necessary for implementing the Act's provisions. In 2004, the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1) were introduced under this Act to extend the arrangements for the repayment of indirect tax to the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, covering purchases made between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002. The policy objective was to facilitate the smooth operation of the Preparatory Commission and to ensure compliance with the bilateral arrangement signed in 2000 for the establishment and provisional operation of the International Monitoring System in Australia.
Scope and Application
The International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 applies to entities and officials of international organisations designated by the Governor-General through regulations, extending to them certain privileges and immunities from legal processes and taxes. The Act encompasses the conduct and transactions of these entities within Australia, providing a framework that allows international organisations to operate without undue interference from domestic laws. The Act’s application is primarily facilitated through subordinate instruments, such as the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1), which was designed to amend earlier regulations to include specific indirect tax refund arrangements for purchases made between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002. This amendment ensures that the PrepCom can be reimbursed for goods and services tax paid during that period, aligning with the bilateral arrangement signed between Australia and the PrepCom to facilitate the establishment of monitoring facilities within Australia. The Regulations do not specify any preconditions for their enactment and are considered consistent with the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, as they do not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth agency.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1) focus on extending the arrangements for the repayment of indirect tax to the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (PrepCom). Regulation 1 identifies the Regulations as the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 1). Regulation 2 states that the Regulations commence on the date of their notification in the Gazette. Regulation 3, through Schedule 1, amends the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 2000. Specifically, item 1 of Schedule 1 modifies subregulation 15(1) to allow the PrepCom to claim the refund of Goods and Services Tax (GST) for acquisitions made between 17 August 2000 and 27 March 2002.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Regulations on the parties involved are primarily centred around the processing of GST refund claims by the PrepCom. Under the amended subregulation 15(1), the PrepCom can now claim refunds for indirect taxes paid on acquisitions made during the specified period. This amendment is designed to ensure that the PrepCom can fully benefit from the tax exemptions agreed upon in the bilateral arrangement between Australia and the PrepCom, which was established to facilitate the hosting of International Monitoring System facilities in Australia. The PrepCom must provide appropriate documentation and evidence to substantiate the claims for GST refunds. The Australian government, through relevant authorities, is required to process these claims in accordance with the amended regulations.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the Explanatory Statement for non-compliance with the Regulations. However, any failure by the PrepCom or the Australian government to adhere to the terms of the bilateral arrangement or the amended regulations could potentially lead to disputes or legal challenges. Given that the regulations do not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth agency, as confirmed by the Attorney General’s Department, the main consequence of non-compliance would likely be financial, in terms of unrecovered GST. The Regulations, while retrospective in effect, are deemed consistent with section 48 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, ensuring that no undue disadvantage is caused to any party other than the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth agency.