STATUTORY RULES.
1927. No. 98.
REGULATION UNDER THE POST AND TELEGRAPH ACT 1901-1923.
I, THE DEPUTY OF THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the undermentioned amended Regulation under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this seventeenth day of August, 1927.
SOMERS,
Deputy of the Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
W. G. GIBSON,
Postmaster-General.
_________
Amendment of the Post and Telegraph Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1913, No. 348, as amended to this date.)
Regulation 71d is amended by inserting in sub-regulation, (2) (c) after the word “sureties” the words “or alternatively with an approved guarantee company as surety”.
________________
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.11035—Price 3d.
Overview
The Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a legal framework for the administration and regulation of postal and telegraph services within the country. This Act aimed to ensure efficient and reliable communication services, and was instrumental in laying the groundwork for modern telecommunications infrastructure in Australia. The 1927 Statutory Rules, specifically Statutory Rules 1927, No. 98, made under this Act, introduce amendments to the Post and Telegraph Regulations, particularly focusing on enhancing the surety mechanisms for service providers. By allowing approved guarantee companies as an alternative to traditional sureties, the regulations seek to streamline the process and potentially reduce administrative burdens for postal and telegraph service operators. The policy objective behind these amendments is to maintain and improve the reliability and efficiency of postal and telegraph services, ensuring they continue to meet the needs of the public and businesses.
Scope and Application
This legislative instrument pertains to the amendment of the Post and Telegraph Regulations, specifically altering Regulation 71d under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923. It applies to entities or individuals engaged in postal or telegraphic services within the Commonwealth of Australia. The amendment allows for an alternative form of surety, specifically with an approved guarantee company, to be used in addition to traditional sureties. The regulation impacts service providers, businesses, and possibly individuals involved in activities governed by the Act, ensuring they adhere to the updated surety requirements. The changes are effective immediately upon the publication of the amended regulation. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within this specific amendment, and the reach of the regulation is confined to the Commonwealth jurisdiction. This legislative instrument does not explicitly mention the use of subordinate instruments to extend or restrict the application, but the amendment itself signifies a direct modification to the existing regulatory framework.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically Regulation 71d, involve an amendment to the Post and Telegraph Regulations. Regulation 71d(2)(c) now permits the use of an approved guarantee company as an alternative to sureties. This means that instead of requiring sureties to guarantee certain obligations, parties involved in postal and telegraph services can now opt to engage an approved guarantee company to provide the same level of assurance. This change is aimed at providing flexibility in how guarantees are managed within the framework of the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this regulation on parties or entities governed by the Act include ensuring that any guarantee provided by an approved guarantee company is in line with the standards and criteria set forth by the Act. This means that the guarantee company must be approved and must meet certain standards to be considered valid. Parties must also adhere to the notification requirements specified in the Act for using a guarantee company instead of traditional sureties. This includes providing the necessary documentation and information to the relevant authorities to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the legislation does not explicitly state any specific penalties within the text provided. However, it is reasonable to infer that any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act, including the use of an approved guarantee company, could result in legal action. This could potentially include fines, penalties, or other enforcement measures as prescribed by the Act. The severity of these consequences would depend on the specific breach and the discretion of the relevant authorities. It is essential for parties involved to ensure strict adherence to the regulatory requirements to avoid any legal repercussions.