AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC TERRITORY
__________
Poisons Ordinance 1985
No. 4 of 1985
I, The ADMINISTRATOR of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Ordinance under the Australian Antarctic Territory Act 1954.
Dated 22 August 1985.
J. A. ROWLAND
Administrator
By His Excellency’s Command,
BARRY O. jONES
Minister of State for Science
for and on behalf of the
Minister of State for Health
__________
An Ordinance to amend the Poisons Regulations of the Australian Capital
Territory, as in force in the Australian Antarctic Territory
Short title
1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Poisons Ordinance 1985.
Dispensing prescriptions
2. Regulation 13 of the Poisons Regulations2 of the Australian Capital Territory, as in force in the Australian Antarctic Territory, is amended by omitting sub-regulation (1) and substituting the following sub-regulation:
“(1) A person shall not dispense a substance to which Part VII of the Ordinance applies or a narcotic drug unless the person is-
(a) a registered medical practitioner;
(b) a registered pharmacist;
(c) a registered veterinary surgeon;
(d) an assistant under the direct personal supervision and control of a registered medical practitioner or registered pharmacist; or
(e) a person authorised under section 10A of the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs Ordinance 1978 of the Australian Capital Territory, as in force in the Australian Antarctic Territory, to be a surgeon’s assistant.”.
NOTES
1. Notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 29 August 1985.
2. Regulations 1963 No. 2 as amended by 1976 No. 22; 1977 No. 4; 1979 Nos. 3 and 26; and 1980 No. 3; all of the Australian Capital Territory, in force in the Australian Antarctic Territory under section 6 of the Australian Antarctic Territory Act 1954.
Overview
The Poisons Ordinance 1985 was enacted to address the need for stricter control over the dispensation of substances that are classified as poisons or narcotics in the Australian Antarctic Territory. This legislative instrument was made by the Administrator, acting on advice from the Federal Executive Council, under the authority of the Australian Antarctic Territory Act 1954. The primary policy objective of this Ordinance is to ensure that only authorised individuals, such as registered medical practitioners, pharmacists, veterinary surgeons, and authorised assistants, are permitted to dispense substances that fall under the purview of the Poisons Ordinance. This measure aims to prevent the misuse of these substances and maintain public safety within the Antarctic region. The Ordinance amends the existing Poisons Regulations of the Australian Capital Territory, making them applicable in the Australian Antarctic Territory, thereby enforcing a uniform standard of control over dangerous substances across these jurisdictions.
Scope and Application
The Poisons Ordinance 1985 applies to individuals and entities operating within the Australian Antarctic Territory, regulating the dispensing of substances classified under Part VII of the Ordinance, as well as narcotic drugs. Specifically, it mandates that only registered medical practitioners, registered pharmacists, registered veterinary surgeons, assistants under the direct supervision of the aforementioned professionals, or persons authorised under section 10A of the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs Ordinance 1978 of the Australian Capital Territory are permitted to dispense these substances. This legislation extends to the regulation of prescriptions as amended by the Poisons Regulations of the Australian Capital Territory, ensuring uniformity in the administration and dispensing of controlled substances across the Australian Antarctic Territory. The Ordinance’s jurisdictional reach is confined to the Australian Antarctic Territory, and it does not explicitly mention any exclusions or exemptions. Any further specifications or modifications to the application of this Ordinance are likely to be addressed through subordinate instruments or regulations, which may provide additional details on enforcement and compliance.
Key Provisions
The Poisons Ordinance 1985, which amends the Poisons Regulations of the Australian Capital Territory, as in force in the Australian Antarctic Territory, introduces significant changes to the regulation of the dispensation of substances and narcotic drugs within the Australian Antarctic Territory (section 1). Specifically, it modifies Regulation 13 of the Poisons Regulations by replacing the existing sub-regulation (1) with a new one (section 2). This amendment specifies that a person is only allowed to dispense substances covered by Part VII of the Ordinance or narcotic drugs if they are a registered medical practitioner, a registered pharmacist, a registered veterinary surgeon, an assistant under the direct supervision of a registered medical practitioner or pharmacist, or a person authorised as a surgeon's assistant under section 10A of the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs Ordinance 1978 of the Australian Capital Territory (sub-regulation (1)).
The obligations imposed by the Poisons Ordinance 1985 are primarily aimed at ensuring that only qualified and authorised individuals can dispense substances and narcotic drugs within the Australian Antarctic Territory. This means that any person involved in the dispensation of these items must be properly registered in their respective field and, in the case of assistants, must be directly supervised by a qualified practitioner. This stringent requirement is intended to maintain the safety and control over the dispensation of potentially hazardous substances in the Antarctic environment.
In terms of consequences for breaches of the Poisons Ordinance 1985, while the specific provisions for penalties and enforcement are not detailed within the excerpt, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance could result in significant penalties. Given the controlled nature of substances covered by Part VII of the Ordinance and narcotic drugs, unauthorised dispensation could lead to severe legal consequences. Typically, such breaches might be subject to both civil and criminal penalties, depending on the severity and intent behind the violation. The maximum penalties, however, are not specified in the provided text but would likely align with the broader legislative framework governing similar activities within Australian territories.