Pella Gogas – NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - 12 March 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
PELLA GOGAS
HIGHTON VIC 3216
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 March 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Sherad Samuel
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the supervision of superannuation entities and the administration of superannuation funds, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The 1993 Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of fund members. The SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, as seen in the case of Pella Gogas, who has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the Act due to contraventions that justify such action. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability from participating in the management of superannuation funds. The disqualification is a critical measure to uphold the standards and trust placed in the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities within Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation funds. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth, with the Commissioner of Taxation having the authority to disqualify individuals from performing roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the Act. The disqualification can be initiated if the nature of the contravention provides sufficient grounds, and it takes effect immediately upon issuance. Under the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting in any role connected to superannuation entities, with penalties including up to two years in jail. The Commissioner may revoke the disqualification on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person, and the decision can be subject to reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of notification. Details of the disqualification are published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains key provisions concerning the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act. Section 126A outlines the Commissioner's authority to disqualify individuals, which occurs if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA and the nature of the contravention warrants such action (subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6)). The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice. This notice to Pella Gogas, dated 12 March 2024, informs her that she has been disqualified under these provisions due to her contraventions of the SISA.
The Act imposes several obligations on individuals who are disqualified. Notably, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate performing such roles. This prohibition is critical to ensuring that individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability do not continue to manage superannuation funds. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in significant legal consequences.
The Act also specifies penalties for breaches of these provisions. According to section 126K, the maximum penalty for knowingly acting in contravention of the disqualification is two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness of the offence and serves as a deterrent against non-compliance. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the Commissioner has the authority to revoke a disqualification either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person. This provision offers a potential pathway for individuals to seek reinstatement, provided they meet the necessary criteria.
For individuals who feel that their disqualification is unjust, the Act provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Section 344 allows a disqualified person to request the Commissioner to reconsider their disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for appealing the decision, providing an opportunity for due process and fairness.