STATUTORY RULES.
1916. No. 162.
________
REGULATION UNDER THE PATENTS ACT 1903-1909.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the undermentioned Regulation under the Patents Act 1903-1909, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-sixth day of July, 1916.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
H. MAHON,
Acting Attorney-General.
________
Amendment of the Patents Regulations 1912.
(Statutory Rules 1912, No. 76.)
After Regulation 152 of the Patents Regulations 1912 the following Regulation is inserted:—
Agent acting for two or more parties.
“152a.—(1) An agent shall not at one and the same time represent two or more parties having conflicting interests in any proceeding or matter before the Commissioner of Patents.
(2) Whenever in any such proceeding or matter the same agent is employed by two or more parties, the Commissioner may at his discretion require that any of the said parties shall, be represented before him by a different agent, and may adjourn any proceeding or matter until that party is so represented.
(3) Whenever an agent has been appointed to represent a party in any proceeding or matter before the Commissioner of Patents, be shall not afterwards represent any other party having a conflicting interest in the proceeding or matter unless he has received from the first-mentioned party written notice of the revocation of his appointment as agent, and has served that notice, or a certified copy thereof, on the Commissioner. The authority of substitution and revocation provided for by Form E in the Second Schedule will not be regarded as sufficient notice of revocation for the purposes of this sub-regulation.”
_______________________
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.9798.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1916 No. 162 represents a legislative instrument enacted by the Governor-General in Council under the authority of the Patents Act 1903-1909. This regulation, which came into operation immediately, was designed to address the issue of agents representing conflicting interests in patent proceedings. Specifically, it aims to ensure ethical and fair representation by prohibiting an agent from simultaneously representing parties with opposing interests before the Commissioner of Patents. The enacting body is the Commonwealth of Australia's Federal Executive Council, with the regulation coming into effect on the 26th of July, 1916. The underlying policy objective is to maintain the integrity and impartiality of patent proceedings by preventing potential conflicts of interest that could arise from dual representation.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1916, No. 162, issued under the Patents Act 1903-1909, pertains to amendments to the Patents Regulations 1912. This legislative instrument applies to agents acting in patent-related proceedings before the Commissioner of Patents. It specifically addresses the conduct of agents who may represent multiple parties in proceedings or matters before the Commissioner, particularly when those parties have conflicting interests. The regulation prohibits an agent from simultaneously representing parties with conflicting interests unless the Commissioner permits it, and mandates that such representation can only change if the original party provides written notice of revocation to the Commissioner. The regulation is intended to uphold the integrity of patent proceedings by ensuring that agents do not have divided loyalties that could compromise their representation. This regulation applies nationally within the Commonwealth of Australia, and there are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the text. The application of this regulation may be further detailed or modified by subordinate instruments, which can provide additional rules or exceptions to the general provisions.
Key Provisions
The main provisions of this regulation concern the representation of parties by agents in proceedings or matters before the Commissioner of Patents, particularly when multiple parties have conflicting interests. According to section 152a(1), an agent is prohibited from representing two or more parties with conflicting interests simultaneously in any proceeding or matter before the Commissioner. If it is discovered that an agent is representing conflicting interests, the Commissioner has the discretion under section 152a(2) to require the affected parties to be represented by different agents and may adjourn the proceeding or matter until this requirement is met. Furthermore, section 152a(3) stipulates that an agent appointed to represent a party in a proceeding or matter cannot subsequently represent another party with conflicting interests unless they have received written notice of revocation from the first party and served this notice, or a certified copy, on the Commissioner. It is noteworthy that the authority of substitution and revocation provided by Form E in the Second Schedule is not considered sufficient notice of revocation for the purposes of this regulation.
The obligations imposed on parties by this regulation include ensuring that agents representing them do not have conflicting interests with other parties involved in the same proceeding or matter. This requirement extends to providing written notice of revocation to the agent if they wish to change representation and ensuring that this notice is served on the Commissioner. Parties must also be vigilant in monitoring the activities of their agents to ensure compliance with these regulations, as failure to do so could result in proceedings being adjourned or other disciplinary actions being taken by the Commissioner.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this regulation can result in various consequences. According to section 152a, the Commissioner has the authority to require parties to be represented by different agents if it is found that an agent is representing conflicting interests. Additionally, the Commissioner may adjourn any proceeding or matter until compliance is achieved. While the regulation does not explicitly state penalties for breach, the potential consequences could include delays in proceedings and possible reputational damage to the parties involved. It is essential for parties and their agents to adhere strictly to these provisions to avoid any adverse outcomes.