EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1983 NO. 207
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Science and Technology
The purpose of the amendments is to vary certain of the fees prescribed in the Second Schedule to the Patent Attorneys Regulations with effect from 3 October 1983. Details of the proposed amendments are set out below.
Regulation 1 sets a date of commencement of 3 October 1983.
Regulation 2 amends items 1, 5 and 6 of the Second Schedule by altering the level of fees.
In arriving at the new scale of fees the Patent Office has given full and proper consideration to all factors relevant to the fixation of fees. Fees in respect of Patent Attorneys were last reviewed in 1982 and the existing scale has had effect since 1 October 1982. Current Government policy requires the Office to cover expenditure by receipts. Estimates for 1983/84 indicate that the proposed variations in fees will have this result in respect of the operation of the Board of Examiners of Patent Attorneys.
Consultations have taken place on the question of fees with the main interest groups, namely the Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia and the Australian Manufacturers’ Patents, Industrial Designs, Copyright and Trade Mark Association.
Proposed and current fees are compared in the attached table.
PATENT ATTORNEYS REGULATIONS
SECOND SCHEDULE
| ITEM/MATTER | CURRENT FEE | PROPOSED FEE |
| | $ | $ |
1 | On lodging application for admission as a candidate at the examination - per subject | 20 | 10 |
2 | On lodging an application for a grant of a supplementary examination - per subject | 20 | (no change) |
3 | On lodging application for report as to reasons for failure - per subject | 20 | (no change) |
4 | On lodging application for a certificate of the Board under regulation 22 | 20 | (no change) |
5 | On lodging application for registration as a patent attorney. | 100 | 120 |
6 | Annual registration fee payable by patent attorney...... | 170 | 200 |
7 | On lodging application for restoration of name of patent attorney which has been removed under regulation 32 | 100 | (no change) |
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1983 No. 207, issued under the authority of the Minister for Science and Technology, represent amendments to the Patent Attorneys Regulations 1983. Enacted to address the need for updated fee structures within the patent attorney sector, these amendments aim to ensure the Patent Office can cover its expenditure through fee receipts, as mandated by current government policy. The amendments, effective from 3 October 1983, revise certain fees outlined in the Second Schedule of the regulations, specifically adjusting items 1, 5, and 6 to reflect changes proposed after thorough consideration by the Patent Office. This includes increasing the fee for lodging an application for registration as a patent attorney and the annual registration fee payable by patent attorneys, while maintaining the fees for other specified matters. The amendments follow consultations with key stakeholders, including the Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia and the Australian Manufacturers’ Patents, Industrial Designs, Copyright and Trade Mark Association.
Scope and Application
The Patent Attorneys Regulations 1983, as amended by the Statutory Rules 1983 No. 207, apply to all individuals and entities involved in the patent application process in Australia, specifically targeting patent attorneys who are engaged in their professional capacity. These regulations govern the fees associated with various patent-related services, including application submissions, supplementary examinations, and the annual registration of patent attorneys. The amendments, which took effect from 3 October 1983, adjust the fees for lodging applications for admission, registration as a patent attorney, and the annual registration fee. Notably, fees for supplementary examinations and other specific applications remain unchanged. These regulations are a Commonwealth instrument, applying nationally across Australia. The Patent Office has ensured that the adjustments are made after thorough consideration of relevant factors and consultations with key stakeholders such as the Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia and the Australian Manufacturers’ Patents, Industrial Designs, Copyright and Trade Mark Association.
Key Provisions
The Statutory Rules 1983 No. 207, issued under the authority of the Minister for Science and Technology, are primarily concerned with the amendment of certain fees prescribed in the Second Schedule of the Patent Attorneys Regulations, effective from 3 October 1983 (Regulation 1). Specifically, these amendments adjust the fees for certain patent-related applications and registrations (Regulation 2). The fees affected include those for lodging an application for admission as a candidate at the examination, application for registration as a patent attorney, and the annual registration fee payable by patent attorneys (Items 1, 5, and 6 of the Second Schedule). These amendments are intended to ensure that the Board of Examiners of Patent Attorneys can cover its expenditure through the fees it collects, as per current government policy.
Under the amended regulations, certain obligations and requirements are placed on the parties involved. Patent applicants, for example, must now pay an increased fee when lodging an application for admission as a candidate at the examination, changing from $20 to $10 per subject (Item 1). Similarly, applicants seeking registration as a patent attorney must now pay a fee of $120, up from $100 (Item 5). Patent attorneys must also now pay an annual registration fee of $200, an increase from $170 (Item 6). These adjustments are aimed at ensuring the financial sustainability of the patent examination process while reflecting the current economic environment and operational costs.
In terms of compliance and enforcement, the legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance with the fee amendments. However, failure to pay the prescribed fees as per the amended regulations could potentially result in the non-processing of applications, which would, in turn, affect the ability of applicants to proceed with their patent applications or for patent attorneys to maintain their registration status. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the text, it can be inferred that non-payment would lead to administrative consequences that could impact the applicants' and attorneys' ability to engage in patent-related activities.