Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L01326 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2)

 

Purpose of Manual of Standards

The Part 145 Manual of Standards (the MOS) sets out the requirements to be met by an organisation approved under Part 145 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) to perform maintenance of aircraft and aeronautical products and to provide training and assessment of employees of the organisation.

 

Background

As a matter of safety policy, CASA has adopted the regulatory approach to maintenance promulgated by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). The specifications set out in the MOS have been developed to be closely aligned with EASA Part 145.

 

Legislation  the Act

Under subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

CASR Part 145

Part 145 of CASR 1998 (CASR Part 145), Continuing airworthiness – Part 145 approved maintenance organisations, deals with requirements for approval as a Part 145 organisation and requirements that apply to a Part 145 approved organisation.

 

Under subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, the regulations may empower CASA to issue instruments in relation to the maintenance or airworthiness of aircraft.

 

To this end, under regulation 145.015 of CASR 1998, CASA is empowered to issue a MOS for CASR Part 145, setting out matters affecting the airworthiness or maintenance of aircraft. Under subregulation 145.015 (2) of CASR 1998, the MOS may specify several matters.

 

Those matters have all been specified in the MOS. To obtain approval to be a maintenance organisation, an organisation must write, submit and keep updated an “exposition”. To support their exposition, they must have a documented set of procedures to show how they meet the requirements of Part 145. These requirements include provisions for facilities, management and technical staff requirements, production planning, maintenance procedures, maintenance recording processes and procedures, and safety and quality policies and procedures.

 

Section 145.A.35 of the MOS sets out the requirements for issuing a certification authorisation for maintenance work. Before allowing an employee to issue or reissue a certification authorisation, a maintenance organisation must ensure that the certifying employee has an adequate understanding of the aircraft and/or aeronautical products referred to in their certification authorisation and the organisation’s procedures and exposition.

 

The amendments of section 145.A.35 set out the conditions for holders of aircraft maintenance engineer (AME) licences rated category B2 to exercise category A maintenance certification privileges on an aircraft type for which they hold the aircraft type rating. Category B2 licence holders may do so only after satisfactory completion of relevant category A aircraft type and task training carried out by a Part 145 or maintenance training organisation.

Before exercising certification privileges on type-rated aircraft, category B2 licence holders will require relevant category A aircraft task training and 6 months of documented practical experience.

 

The changes adopt recent changes to the European Commission Regulation 2042/2003 (EASA Parts 66 and 145).

 

Other amendments include replacement of the definition of main location. There are also changes of an editorial nature, to correct an incorrect reference and for consistency in style.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under regulation 145.015 of CASR 1998, the MOS was made for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act. In particular, it was issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a). Under subsection 98 (5AA) of the Act, the MOS is, therefore, a legislative instrument but the effect of Part 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA) (sunsetting of legislative instruments) is excluded.

 

Consultation

CASA published particulars of the MOS amendment on its internet site under regulation 11.280 of CASR 1998 and invited comments from the public and aviation industry. The amendments were displayed on the CASA site for the required period of 28 days before making.  Changes were made to the displayed amendments following receipt of comments.

 

CASA has complied with the consultation requirements under section 17 of the LIA and Subpart 11.J of CASR 1998.

 

Human rights compatibility

This instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. It is compatible with human rights and does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Human rights implications

The instrument sets out technical requirements for the exercise of privileges as described above. The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement was prepared for CASR Part 145 and assessed by OBPR as meeting the Australian Governments Best Practice Regulation requirements (OBPR ID: 11558). Having been made under CASR Part 145, the same OBPR outcome extends to this amending instrument.

 

Making and commencement

The MOS amendment commences on the day after registration.

 

The instrument has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

[Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2)]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation and to provide a regulatory framework for the maintenance and airworthiness of aircraft. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2) was introduced to address the need for updated and aligned maintenance standards with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Part 145 regulatory approach. This amendment to the Manual of Standards (MOS) was made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically section 98(5A), empowering the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue instruments related to aircraft maintenance. The policy objective is to ensure that maintenance organisations comply with updated safety standards and procedures, aligning with international best practices. The instrument was developed following consultation with the public and industry stakeholders and was registered and commenced on the day after registration, reflecting CASA’s commitment to maintaining high safety standards in the aviation sector.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2) applies to any organisation approved under Part 145 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 to perform maintenance of aircraft and aeronautical products and to provide training and assessment of employees. This amendment instrument is designed to ensure alignment with the European Aviation Safety Agency’s regulatory approach to maintenance and updates the conditions under which aircraft maintenance engineers with category B2 licences can exercise category A maintenance certification privileges. It applies nationally across Australia and is issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation. The instrument does not include any specific exclusions or exemptions, but its provisions are subject to change through subordinate instruments. The amendment process involved public consultation, and it is compatible with human rights, as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Part 145 Manual of Standards Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 2) (MOS Amendment) introduces modifications to the MOS, which governs the approval and operations of maintenance organisations under CASR Part 145. The MOS Amendment, which is aligned with the European Aviation Safety Agency's (EASA) regulatory approach, specifies conditions for aircraft maintenance engineer (AME) licence holders to exercise maintenance certification privileges on aircraft types for which they hold the relevant type rating. These conditions include the requirement for category B2 licence holders to complete relevant category A aircraft type and task training, as well as six months of documented practical experience. The MOS Amendment also includes editorial changes to correct inaccuracies and improve consistency. Organisations seeking approval under CASR Part 145 must adhere to the requirements outlined in the MOS. This includes maintaining a documented set of procedures demonstrating compliance with the MOS, as well as ensuring that certifying employees have an adequate understanding of the aircraft and/or aeronautical products and the organisation's procedures and exposition. The organisation must also hold an exposition, which outlines their maintenance capabilities, and keep it updated. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), failure to comply with the provisions of the MOS Amendment and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) may result in enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The Act empowers CASA to issue infringement notices and prosecute for breaches of the regulations. Infringement notices may be issued for minor or technical breaches, with penalties up to $5,550 for individuals and $27,750 for corporations. Prosecution may be undertaken for more serious breaches, with potential penalties including substantial fines and imprisonment. CASA has ensured compliance with consultation requirements under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The MOS Amendment was published on CASA's website, and comments from the public and aviation industry were considered before finalising the amendments. The instrument does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms and is compatible with human rights. A Regulation Impact Statement was prepared and assessed by the Office of Best Practice Regulation as meeting the Australian Government's best practice regulation requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.