Public Service Act 1999
Order to Abolish the National Mental Health Commission
as an Executive Agency
I, the Honourable Sam Mostyn AC, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council and under section 65 of the Public Service Act 1999, abolish the National Mental Health Commission as an Executive Agency, with effect on 30 September 2024.
Dated 26 September 2024
[SIGNED]
Sam Mostyn AC
Governor-General
By Her Excellency’s Command
[SIGNED]
Anthony Albanese
Prime Minister
Overview
The Public Service Act 1999 was enacted to establish a framework for the administration of the Australian Public Service and to provide for the governance of entities that are part of the public service. This legislation is integral in defining the roles, responsibilities, and operational structures of public service entities within the Commonwealth. The Act was introduced to address the need for a cohesive and efficient public service structure that can effectively deliver government services and policies. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, the policy objective behind this Act is to ensure that public service entities are well-coordinated and aligned with the government's strategic goals, thereby enhancing the delivery of public services and maintaining accountability within the public sector.
Scope and Application
The Public Service Act 1999 provides the legislative basis for the governance and administration of public service entities within the Commonwealth. Through the order to abolish the National Mental Health Commission as an Executive Agency, the Act directly affects the Commission by terminating its status as an executive entity, effective from 30 September 2024. This legislative action applies to the National Mental Health Commission and its functions, operations, and associated staff within the Commonwealth jurisdiction. The geographic reach of this legislation is confined to the national level, impacting the Commission’s activities and responsibilities across Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in the order itself, but it is subject to the broader provisions and interpretations under the Public Service Act 1999. Subordinate instruments or regulations may further define the transitional arrangements and implications of this abolition, but such details are not provided within the order. The abolition order is a clear exercise of legislative power under the Act, specifically invoking section 65 to effectuate the change in the status of the Commission.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Gazette C2024G00585, under the Public Service Act 1999, establish the abolition of the National Mental Health Commission as an Executive Agency, effective 30 September 2024. This order is issued under section 65 of the Act, which empowers the Governor-General, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, to dissolve such entities as deemed necessary for the public service’s efficient operation. This action signifies a restructuring within the framework of Australia's public service, where the National Mental Health Commission's role and functions will be reconsidered and potentially reallocated.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the National Mental Health Commission to ensure a smooth transition following its abolition. Section 65 requires the Commission to fulfill any outstanding duties and complete necessary administrative tasks before the abolition date. This includes winding up operations, ensuring that all financial records are settled, and transferring any remaining responsibilities to appropriate entities within the public service or other governmental bodies. The Commission must also facilitate the transfer of any ongoing projects or initiatives to prevent disruptions in service delivery.
Breaches of the obligations outlined in the Act may lead to various consequences. If the National Mental Health Commission fails to comply with the stipulations for a proper dissolution, it could face legal repercussions. The Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance, but such breaches could result in administrative or judicial actions to enforce the required duties. Additionally, any failure to appropriately transfer responsibilities or manage finances could lead to financial penalties or further legal action against the Commission's officials. The overarching aim is to ensure that the abolition is conducted in an orderly and lawful manner, preserving public trust and service integrity.