Oath of Allegiance - His Excellency the Honourable Hieu Van Le AO

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2015G00882 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

 

OATH OF ALLEGIANCE

 

 

I, HIEU VAN LE, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law.   SO HELP ME GOD!

 

 

 

 

        Hieu Van Le

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sworn, declared and subscribed by the abovenamed Hieu Van Le at Adelaide in the State of South Australia before me on 3 June 2015

 

 

Geoffrey Nettle

 

 

Justice of the High Court of Australia

 

 

Overview

The Oath of Allegiance Act 2005 (Cth) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for a consistent and legally binding oath of allegiance for all Australian citizens. This Act was introduced to ensure that all citizens, irrespective of their immigration status, formally commit to the principles of allegiance to the Crown, thereby formalising their integration into the Australian community. The policy objective of the Act is to standardise the process of taking an oath of allegiance, ensuring that it is a clear, unequivocal expression of loyalty to the Queen and her successors. By mandating this oath, the Act reinforces the fundamental principles of allegiance that are central to Australian citizenship and governance, providing a formal mechanism for new citizens to publicly and officially declare their commitment to the nation.

Scope and Application

The Oath of Allegiance, as exemplified by the document C2015G00882, pertains to individuals who are required to take an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs, and successors according to law. This particular instance involves Hieu Van Le, who swore the oath before Geoffrey Nettle, a Justice of the High Court of Australia, in Adelaide, South Australia on 3 June 2015. The scope of this legislation applies to any individual who is required to make such an oath, often necessitated by legal or governmental roles that demand a commitment to the Crown. The oath itself is a legal requirement for certain persons, typically those seeking naturalisation as Australian citizens or those entering specific public services, thereby underscoring its jurisdictional reach within the Commonwealth of Australia. The legislation does not explicitly outline exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but its application is generally understood to be mandatory for those in the specified categories, with potential extensions or restrictions being delineated in subordinate instruments or related statutes.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation, titled "Oath of Allegiance" (section 1), involve the swearing of an oath by an individual, in this case, Hieu Van Le. This oath (section 2) requires the individual to declare their faithfulness and allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as well as to her heirs and successors according to law. This declaration is made in a solemn and formal manner, witnessed and authenticated by a Justice of the High Court of Australia, Geoffrey Nettle, in this instance. The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Hieu Van Le, the individual swearing the oath, must declare the contents of the oath in a truthful and sincere manner, acknowledging their allegiance to the monarch and their successors. The witnessing and authentication by a Justice of the High Court of Australia, Geoffrey Nettle, ensure that the oath is properly administered and that the individual's declaration is officially recognised. This process is conducted in a formal setting, as evidenced by the location and date specified in the document, Adelaide in the State of South Australia on 3 June 2015. The legislation does not explicitly state any offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences for breach. However, the solemn nature of the oath and its attestation by a Justice of the High Court of Australia suggest that any breach or insincerity in the declaration could have serious legal and reputational consequences. While the document does not specify the exact penalties, the serious implications of making a false oath are well-established under Australian law, potentially including criminal charges and penalties for perjury or false declarations. The formalities surrounding the oath's administration underscore the gravity with which such commitments are regarded.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.