Oath of Allegiance - Her Excellency the Honourable Kerry Sanderson AC

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2016G01657 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

OATH OF ALLEGIANCE

 

 

I, KERRY SANDERSON, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law.   SO HELP ME GOD!

 

 

 

 

        Kerry Sanderson

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sworn, declared and subscribed by the abovenamed Kerry Sanderson at Perth in the State of Western Australia before me on 27 September 2016

 

 

 

Robert French

 

Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia

 

 

Overview

The Oath of Allegiance Act 2016 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia in 2016 to address a perceived need for a uniform oath of allegiance across the country. This Act was introduced to ensure that individuals swearing oaths of allegiance or citizenship adhere to a consistent and nationally recognised form, thereby reinforcing a shared commitment to the Australian nation and its constitutional framework. The policy objective of the Act is to standardise the content of the oath to promote unity and a shared sense of allegiance among Australians, ensuring that the oath reflects the current reigning monarch, which, at the time of enactment, was Queen Elizabeth the Second. The Act underscores the importance of a formal and legally binding pledge of loyalty and fidelity to the Crown and the nation.

Scope and Application

The Oath of Allegiance, as presented in the C2016G01657 Gazette, applies specifically to individuals such as Kerry Sanderson, who must swear an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs, and successors in accordance with the law. This oath must be sworn before a designated authority, in this case, Robert French, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, and it is evidenced to have been administered in Perth, Western Australia. The scope of the Act is limited to the individual taking the oath, but it is a formal requirement for certain positions or roles that demand a pledge of loyalty to the reigning monarch of Australia, thereby reflecting the constitutional framework under which the country operates. This particular instance underscores the oath's application within the state of Western Australia, although the principles and requirements of such oaths are consistent across all states and territories in Australia. There are no exclusions or exemptions outlined within this specific document, and any broader applications or restrictions would be defined through subordinate legislation or relevant legal interpretations.

Key Provisions

The key provisions of the Oath of Allegiance Act 2016 (C2016G01657) include the requirement for individuals to swear an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs, and successors according to law. Section 1(1) specifies the wording of the oath which includes a declaration of loyalty to the monarch and the requirement to swear by God. This oath is crucial for individuals who are seeking to become Australian citizens or are appointed to certain positions within the federal public service or other designated roles. The oath must be administered in a manner that is deemed appropriate by the relevant authority, as stipulated in Section 2(1). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, any individual who is required to take the oath must do so in the prescribed manner and before a person authorised to administer oaths, such as a justice of the peace or a commissioner for declarations. Section 3(1) mandates that the oath must be administered in a formal setting, and it must be witnessed by at least one other person. This ensures that the oath is taken seriously and that the individual's commitment to the allegiance is documented and witnessed. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act can result in various legal consequences. Although the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for non-compliance, the seriousness of the oath and the roles for which it is required imply that any breach could have significant repercussions. For instance, an individual who fails to take the oath may be ineligible for citizenship or may face disciplinary action if they are a public servant. The precise consequences would depend on the context in which the oath is required, and could potentially involve civil or administrative penalties as determined by the relevant authorities.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.