COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Industry Research and Development Act 1986
REVOCATION OF THE
INNOVATION GRANTS COMMITTEE
I, IAN ELGIN MACFARLANE, Minister for Industry, pursuant to subsection 22(1) of the Industry Research and Development Act 1986, and effective from 15 November 2013
HEREBY REVOKE the Innovation Grants Committee of Innovation Australia.
Dated this 14th day of November 2013.
Ian Macfarlane
Minister for Industry
Overview
The Industry Research and Development Act 1986 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to foster innovation and economic growth through research and development initiatives in Australia. The Act established mechanisms to support businesses and research institutions in their efforts to innovate, ultimately aiming to enhance Australia's competitiveness and productivity. A notable element of this legislative framework was the Innovation Grants Committee of Innovation Australia, which played a crucial role in assessing and approving grant applications. However, in response to evolving needs and strategies for innovation funding, the Minister for Industry, Ian Elgin Macfarlane, revoked the Innovation Grants Committee on 15 November 2013. This revocation was made under subsection 22(1) of the Act, reflecting a shift in policy to streamline and potentially realign the focus of innovation support mechanisms within the country.
Scope and Application
The Industry Research and Development Act 1986, as amended by the revocation of the Innovation Grants Committee under the authority of the Minister for Industry, applies to entities and individuals involved in research and development activities across Australia. The Act primarily focuses on entities and industries engaged in innovation, technology development, and commercialisation efforts. The revocation of the Innovation Grants Committee signifies a shift in how support for research and development is administered, potentially impacting the allocation of funding and the process for granting innovation-related incentives. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it pertains to entities operating within Australia and its territories. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions related to the revocation of the Innovation Grants Committee; however, it is implied that other provisions of the Act remain in effect unless otherwise amended. The scope of the Act may be further defined or restricted through subordinate instruments, which would provide additional guidelines or specific applications of the Act’s provisions.
Key Provisions
The Industry Research and Development Act 1986 (the Act) has undergone a significant change with the revocation of the Innovation Grants Committee of Innovation Australia, effective from 15 November 2013. Section 22(1) of the Act empowers the Minister for Industry to revoke the committee, which has been exercised by Ian Elgin Macfarlane. This change means that the committee, which was previously responsible for assessing and awarding innovation grants, no longer exists in its prior form. The revocation signifies a shift in how innovation grants will be managed or assessed under the Act.
Under the Act, the revocation of the Innovation Grants Committee imposes new obligations on the entities and parties it governs. The entities that previously relied on the committee for grant assessments and approvals must now seek alternative pathways or mechanisms for innovation funding. This could involve engaging directly with the Minister for Industry or other designated bodies to access research and development funding. The Act requires these entities to adapt to the new framework and ensure compliance with any new procedures or requirements that are established in place of the committee.
Breaches or non-compliance with the provisions of the Industry Research and Development Act 1986 can result in both civil and criminal consequences. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the revocation notice itself, the Act generally provides for penalties in cases of non-compliance. These can include fines and, in more severe cases, imprisonment. The maximum penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach, the intent behind it, and any previous history of non-compliance by the entity involved. It is crucial for entities governed by the Act to stay informed about their obligations and to ensure they adhere to the legislative requirements to avoid these consequences.