NOTICE OF VARIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION- SUDEEP GOHIL
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SUDEEP GOHIL
LANE COVE WEST NSW 2066
I, Andrew Orme, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 344(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have varied your disqualification under subsection 344(4) of the SISA. You have been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have varied our decision to disqualify you as I am satisfied that you, as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you from acting as a trustee or a responsible officer of a corporate trustee.
Dated: 11 November 2022
Andrew Orme
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Brenden Morley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of the decision. This request must be made in writing within 28 days of receiving notice of this decision.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to provide a regulatory framework that safeguards the financial well-being and retirement benefits of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by imposing stringent requirements and prohibitions on the conduct of trustees and responsible officers. This includes disqualification provisions for those who fail to comply with the Act’s standards, as exemplified by the notice of variation of disqualification issued to Sudeep Gohil.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, it targets responsible officers of corporate trustees, trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, extending its jurisdiction across the entire nation. However, certain exclusions and exemptions may apply depending on the specific provisions of the Act and any subordinate instruments that might further define its scope. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, with penalties including a maximum of two years imprisonment for acting in a disqualified capacity. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional clarity or specific guidelines on its enforcement. In this instance, the notice of variation of disqualification provided to Sudeep Gohil under the authority of a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation highlights the Act's capacity to address and mitigate non-compliance by imposing and varying disqualifications based on the seriousness of the contraventions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines the key provisions governing disqualification of individuals from participating in the superannuation industry. The Act allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees, responsible officers, or in any other capacity that involves managing superannuation funds, if they have contravened the Act (section 126A). In the case of Sudeep Gohil, a disqualification notice was issued under section 344(4) of the SISA, which has now been varied under section 344(6) (C2022G01125).
Under the Act, Sudeep Gohil is prohibited from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to a contravention of the SISA, with the seriousness of the contravention justifying this disqualification. The notice, issued by Andrew Orme as a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, states that the decision to disqualify has been varied but does not provide further detail on the nature of the contravention or the specifics of the variation (section 126A(7)). The disqualification notice also informs Gohil of the potential for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon Gohil's written application (subsection 126A(5)).
Any person who is disqualified under the SISA and who knows of their disqualification is subject to penalties if they continue to act in the prohibited capacity. Specifically, it is an offence under section 126K to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. Additionally, details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette (subsection 126A(7)).
Should Sudeep Gohil wish to contest the decision, he has the right to apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal within 28 days of receiving the notice of the disqualification. This right of review is provided under section 344 of the SISA, which also outlines the procedure for such an application. The notice clearly outlines these rights and the process for seeking a review of the decision, ensuring that Gohil is fully aware of his options in response to the disqualification.