Notice of Substituted Rates of Customs Duty for Excise-Equivalent Goods - Notice (No. 4) 2016

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au C2016G01161 In force Gazette

Legislation content

Customs Tariff Act 1995

 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTED RATES OF CUSTOMS DUTY FOR EXCISE-EQUIVALENT GOODS

 

 

NOTICE (No. 4) 2016

 

I, Jane McClintock, delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs, in accordance with

subsection 19AB(11) of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff Act), give notice that, on and from 1 September 2016:

 

               the increased rate of customs duty for excise-equivalent goods classified to each subheading of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act set out in Column 1 of the Table below is the rate in Column 2 opposite that subheading;

               the increased rate of customs duty for excise-equivalent goods classified to a subheading of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act, as specified in an item in the tables in Schedules:

  • 5 (US originating goods)
  • 6 (Thai originating goods)
  • 7 (Chilean originating goods)
  • 8 (ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand originating goods)
  • 9 (Malaysian originating goods)
  • 10 (Korean originating goods)
  • 11 (Japanese originating goods)
  • 12 (Chinese originating goods)

in the Tariff Act, is the rate in Column 2 of the Table below opposite that subheading.

TABLE : THE TARIFF ACT - TARIFF SUBHEADINGS AFFECTED BY

1 SEPTEMBER 2016 AWOTE INDEXATION

Column 1

Column 2

Customs Tariff Subheading

New Rates of Duty Operative from 1 September 2016

2401.10.00

 

 

 

$763.20/kg

2401.20.00

2402.10.80

2403.11.00

2403.91.00

$763.20/kg of tobacco content

2401.30.00

2402.20.80

2403.19.90

2403.99.80

 

2402.10.20

2402.20.20

2403.19.10

 

$0.61054/stick

 

Dated this 25th day of August 2016.


  

  (signed)

Jane McClintock

Delegate of the

Comptroller-General

of Customs

Overview

The Customs Tariff Act 1995, enacted by the Australian Parliament, is the legislative framework that governs the imposition of customs duties on imported goods. This Act was introduced to address the need for a structured and systematic approach to the collection of customs duties, ensuring that the revenue generated from these duties contributes to the national economy. The Customs Tariff Act 1995 also seeks to protect domestic industries by imposing tariffs that can deter the importation of certain goods that might otherwise compete unfairly with Australian-made products. The Act provides a mechanism for the regular review and adjustment of these duties, which is essential for maintaining a fair and competitive marketplace. The 2016 Notice of Substituted Rates of Customs Duty for Excise-Equivalent Goods is an example of how the Act facilitates periodic updates to duty rates, reflecting changes such as the Australian Wage Price Index, thereby ensuring the ongoing relevance and effectiveness of the tariff system.

Scope and Application

The Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies to the regulation of customs duties, which are levied on goods imported into Australia. The Act applies to all individuals and entities involved in the importation of goods, ensuring compliance with the specified rates of duty. The scope of the Act includes the imposition and adjustment of customs duty rates, including those for excise-equivalent goods, as demonstrated in the Notice of Substituted Rates of Customs Duty for Excise-Equivalent Goods. The notice, issued under the authority of the delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs, specifies changes to the rates of customs duty effective from 1 September 2016. This adjustment is based on the Australian Wage Price Index (AWOTE) indexation, affecting specific subheadings of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act. The notice outlines the new rates applicable to various subheadings, reflecting changes in duty for goods such as tobacco products. The Act's application is national, covering all states and territories of Australia, and it does not specify exclusions or exemptions beyond those defined in the Tariff Act and its schedules. Subordinate instruments may further extend or refine the application of the Act.

Key Provisions

The Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff Act) outlines the application of customs duties on various goods, with the key provision in this notice being the substitution of rates for excise-equivalent goods. According to subsection 19AB(11) of the Tariff Act, this notice specifies that from 1 September 2016, the rates of customs duty for excise-equivalent goods will change. The new rates are detailed in a table, where Column 1 lists the relevant tariff subheadings, and Column 2 specifies the new rates of duty applicable from the specified date. For example, for goods classified under subheading 2401.1, the new rate of duty is $763.20 per kilogram, while for subheading 2401.2, the rate remains at $0.00. This change affects goods covered under Schedule 3 of the Tariff Act, including those originating from various countries such as the US, Thailand, Chile, ASEAN, Malaysia, Korea, Japan, and China. The notice imposes obligations on entities that import or handle excise-equivalent goods. Importers must ensure they are aware of the new duty rates applicable from 1 September 2016 and adjust their pricing and documentation accordingly. This includes updating their customs declarations to reflect the new rates. Businesses that fail to comply with these updated duty rates may face discrepancies in their import bills, potentially leading to fines or other penalties. Furthermore, entities involved in the supply chain, such as logistics providers and customs brokers, must also be aware of these changes to ensure accurate processing and compliance with the updated tariff rates. Failure to comply with the new rates of customs duty as stipulated in the notice can lead to several consequences. Under the Tariff Act, importers and businesses that do not adhere to the specified duty rates may face civil and criminal penalties. The exact nature and severity of these penalties depend on the degree of non-compliance, but they can include fines, imprisonment, or both. The maximum penalties are determined by the specific circumstances of the breach and the discretion of the court. For instance, knowingly or recklessly providing false information to avoid duty could result in significant fines and imprisonment, whereas minor oversights might attract lesser penalties. It is crucial for all parties involved to ensure they are compliant with the new rates to avoid these adverse outcomes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Taxation Law
International Trade Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.