NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Ms Olga Jurcagova
DARLINGHURST NSW 2010
I, Mathew Hanscombe, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to revoke the disqualification notice issued to you on 24 October 2013.
The revocation of the disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: this 19th day of December 2013.
Mathew Hanscombe
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this revocation disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues of governance, transparency, and accountability within the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure that the management and administration of superannuation funds adhere to high standards, thereby protecting the interests of fund members and promoting public confidence in the superannuation system. This legislation provides the regulatory framework for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which is the enacting body responsible for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by ensuring that funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of their members. The revocation of a disqualification notice under the Act, such as the notice to Ms Olga Jurcagova, reflects the authority's role in enforcing compliance and addressing misconduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, encompassing trustees, directors, and other responsible persons within superannuation funds. This Act governs the conduct and operations of these entities to ensure compliance with regulatory standards and protection of fund members. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act may impose disqualification orders on individuals found to have breached relevant provisions, with the power to revoke such orders vested in the Commissioner of Taxation or their delegates, as exemplified in the notice to Ms Olga Jurcagova. While the Act broadly applies to the superannuation industry, specific exclusions or exemptions are not detailed within the notice itself, but are typically outlined in the Act’s provisions. The application and interpretation of the Act may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments or regulations, which provide additional detail or address specific scenarios not explicitly covered in the primary legislation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice pertain to disqualification orders and their revocation. Under subsection 126A(6) (paragraph 1), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case, Mathew Hanscombe, has the authority to make a decision to revoke a disqualification notice. This revocation takes effect on the day the notice is made, as stated in the document. The notice is provided to Ms Olga Jurcagova, detailing the revocation of a disqualification order issued to her on 24 October 2013. The notice also confirms that particulars of this revocation will be published in the Gazette as required by subsection 126A(7) (paragraph 2).
The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties involved. Ms Olga Jurcagova, who is subject to the disqualification notice, must comply with the terms of the revocation (paragraph 3). This includes understanding that her disqualification has been revoked and that she is no longer subject to the restrictions that the disqualification imposed. The delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this instance, Mathew Hanscombe, is required to ensure that the process of revocation is carried out correctly and that all formal notifications are made in accordance with the Act (paragraph 4).
Any breaches of the provisions under the SISA can result in various consequences. Offences under the Act can lead to both civil and criminal penalties (paragraph 5). While the specific penalties are not detailed in the notice, it is known that the Act provides for substantial fines and potential imprisonment for serious breaches (paragraph 6). The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the offence, but they can be severe enough to deter non-compliance with the Act’s requirements (paragraph 7).